1-20 of 41 results for dept:"Ministry of Defence"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.222 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.014 seconds
- Search query
- dept:"Ministry of Defence"
- We searched for
- department_t:"Ministry of Defence" OR department_t:MOD OR department_ses:45998 OR answeringDept_ses:45998
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, for what reasons his Department cannot delay implementation of payments pending the outcome of an incompleted appeal before the Army Board in relation to individuals seeking compensation for having been illegally dismissed from the Armed Forces as a result of a caution.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, for what reasons his Department cannot delay implementation of payments pending the outcome of an incompleted appeal before the Army Board in relation to individuals seeking compensation for having been illegally dismissed from the Armed Forces as a result of a caution.
The Armed Forces payment system is not designed for, and only has limited capacity, to accommodate individual financial circumstances. Delays to payments can be made in exceptional circumstances. However, in cases where Ministry of Defence considerations are complete, payment will be made as appropriate.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many people have received payments in compensation for having been illegally dismissed from the Armed Forces as a result of a caution; and what the cost to the public purse has been of those payments.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many people have received payments in compensation for having been illegally dismissed from the Armed Forces as a result of a caution; and what the cost to the public purse has been of those payments.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my right hon. Friend, the Minister for Defence Personnel and Veterans on 30 November 2017 to Question 115863.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the implications are for the implementation of the provisions of the Military Covenant of not delaying compensation payments when requested to do so for people who have been illegally dismissed from the Armed Forces as a result of a caution.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the implications are for the implementation of the provisions of the Military Covenant of not delaying compensation payments when requested to do so for people who have been illegally dismissed from the Armed Forces as a result of a caution.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my right hon. Friend, the Minister for Defence Personnel and Veterans on 30 November 2017 to Question 115863.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will take steps to postpone the publication of the report of the non-statutory inquiry established to investigate the notification and after-care of next-of-kin and families of armed forces personnel recently deceased until he has sought permission of the bereaved families...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will take steps to postpone the publication of the report of the non-statutory inquiry established to investigate the notification and after-care of next-of-kin and families of armed forces personnel recently deceased until he has sought permission of the bereaved families...
The Army has postponed the publication of the non-statutory inquiry to address a concern raised by one family.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps his Department takes to ensure that it (a) seeks the permission of and (b) notifies in advance bereaved families who are named in its reports.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps his Department takes to ensure that it (a) seeks the permission of and (b) notifies in advance bereaved families who are named in its reports.
The Ministry of Defence (MOD) takes great care to respect the wishes of bereaved families. All reports issued by the MOD are redacted in accordance with the principles of data protection legislation, including the removal of names of bereaved family members. While the MOD does not require formal permission from bereaved family members to publish a Service Inquiry (SI), we recognise the sensitive nature of the material and will always endeavour to ensure that next-of-kin are made aware of pending publication. Bereaved families receive a redacted copy of the SI report before publication and are offered a briefing on its content.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 17 November to Question 111719 on Armed Forces: Bereavement Counselling, (a) when the eight members attended the Visiting Officer course and (b) who provided the training; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 17 November to Question 111719 on Armed Forces: Bereavement Counselling, (a) when the eight members attended the Visiting Officer course and (b) who provided the training; and if he will make a statement.
The Army's Bereavement and Aftercare Support (BAS) team are a part of the overall welfare process, with specific focus for the notification and aftercare support for casualties and bereaved families. The BAS team act in support of the Visiting Officer (VO) in the early stages of bereavement and once the time is right for the VO to be stood down, they provide the enduring support for the families.
The VO course is delivered by the Head of the Army BAS team and his training staff, and is mandatory for all VO and new members of the BAS team. The eight BAS staff attended the course between 2007 and 2017, according to when they joined the team.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what changes have been made to the Defence Medical Information Capability Programme in relation to (a) regular and (b) reserve personnel since 2014; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what changes have been made to the Defence Medical Information Capability Programme in relation to (a) regular and (b) reserve personnel since 2014; and if he will make a statement.
The Defence Medical Information Capability Programme (DMICP) provides electronic primary healthcare records for all serving personnel, their dependants in some overseas locations and civilian staff deployed in support of operations. The Ministry of Defence works closely with the DMICP software provider to deliver enhancements that reduce the risk to patient safety, irrespective of who the patient is, and reflect legislative changes.
Since 2014 a number of minor changes have been made to the DMICP, such as adding new medical practices to the system. More significant changes have also been made, including, but not limited to:
• Enabling the monitoring and reporting of performance against the General Medical Services contract Quality and Outcomes Framework. This supports the management of some of the most common chronic diseases.
• A new joint system for recording an individual's medical deployability status.
• The deployed version of DMICP has benefited from new hardware and enhancements to the software.
• An interface between DMICP and the new NHS messaging service, providing electronic delivery of pathology reports from NHS and other laboratories.
• A new DMICP training system, allowing more users to be trained and a wider range of training courses to be provided.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether a support mechanism has been developed with medical and welfare staff for the use of bereavement and aftercare support staff; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether a support mechanism has been developed with medical and welfare staff for the use of bereavement and aftercare support staff; and if he will make a statement.
Service personnel who act as Casualty Notification Officers or Visiting Officers are provided with appropriate training and welfare support as necessary, in keeping with these emotionally demanding roles. Bereavement and aftercare support staff are often civilians who do not tend to deal directly with families in the early stages of loss. Line managers are, however, alert to the effect which this type of work might have on staff and provide signposting to support services as necessary.
The Defence People Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy (DPMHWS) 2017-2022 was launched on 20 July 2017 and covers all Defence people. The Strategy identifies the need for strong Partnerships with the Department of Health, the NHS in England and the Devolved Administrations and the charitable sector and a new operating model focusing on Promote, Prevent, Treat and Detect. The Strategy is well resourced through connected agencies and services which the forthcoming Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy Action Plan will take on and develop, including plans to introduce standardised mental health and wellbeing education and training for all those working in Defence. The DPMHWS can be found at the following link:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/defence-people-mental-health-and-wellbeing-strategy
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many welfare case officers have been appointed in the armed forces to support an individual on the Vulnerable Risk Management (VRM) system; and what changes to the VRM system his Department has made since 2014.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many welfare case officers have been appointed in the armed forces to support an individual on the Vulnerable Risk Management (VRM) system; and what changes to the VRM system his Department has made since 2014.
The information is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
The Suicide Vulnerability Risk Management (SVRM) system is part of a preventative strategy aimed at reducing incidences of suicide in the Army. The Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force have similar systems in place. In late 2013, the Army reviewed the SVRM and identified a requirement for an information system to be developed which captured all those on a care assessment plan, replacing the previous manual system. The Vulnerability Risk Management Information System was rolled out across the Army between November 2014 and September 2015.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether his Department has conducted a review of its Welfare Groups examining the (a) relevance, (b) timeline and (c) methods by which information is delivered to families and next of kin following (i) bereavement and (ii) serious injury of (A) regular and...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether his Department has conducted a review of its Welfare Groups examining the (a) relevance, (b) timeline and (c) methods by which information is delivered to families and next of kin following (i) bereavement and (ii) serious injury of (A) regular and...
The Casualty and Compassionate process is kept under constant review by both the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and the single Services. The Defence Internal Auditors (DIA) conducted an end-to-end review of the process, publishing their report in October 2016. The MOD welcomed the report and was addressed the policy issues raised within it. In addition, in conjunction with the Joint Casualty and Compassionate Centre, a "Purple Pack" has been produced. This publication signposts and highlights various avenues of assistance available to families and friends in need. It is produced in electronic format, but hard copies can be printed should a family so wish. The Purple Pack can be accessed at the following address:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/joint-casualty-and-compassionate-centre-jccc
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, on what date the Army Drill Manual directions for military funerals were last revised; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, on what date the Army Drill Manual directions for military funerals were last revised; and if he will make a statement.
The Army Drill Manual directions for Military Funerals were last amended in September 2007. Some new amendments will be issued soon to reflect recently identified lessons.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many members of staff working in the Bereavement and Aftercare Support Service have received training for their duties in that service since 2014; what training was provided; who delivered that training; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many members of staff working in the Bereavement and Aftercare Support Service have received training for their duties in that service since 2014; what training was provided; who delivered that training; and if he will make a statement.
The Army's Bereavement and Aftercare Support team are a part of the overall welfare process, with specific focus for the notification and aftercare support for casualties and bereaved families.
Eight of the 10 members of the team have attended a Visiting Officers course. This provides an awareness of the many and varied reactions to the loss of a loved one, an understanding of the extent of the Army's duty of care, and where support for the families can be obtained.
Further development comes from the shared experience and best practice gained by working closely with Visiting Officers and Regional Brigade Casualty Officers.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, on what date he made it his policy to allow personal information to be passed from a Senior Medical Officer and a Regimental Medical Officer to civilian medical officers.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, on what date he made it his policy to allow personal information to be passed from a Senior Medical Officer and a Regimental Medical Officer to civilian medical officers.
The Defence Medical Services holds and manages personal and confidential information relating to patients. The relevant legal regulations are:
- Access to Medical Reports Act 1988.
- Human Rights Act 1998.
- Access to Health Records Act 1990.
- Computer Misuse Act 1990.
- Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 98).
- Confidentiality: NHS Code of Practice.
- Common Law Duty of Confidentiality.
- Health and Social Care (Safety and Quality) Act 2015.
- The Caldicott Principles.
- General Medical Council - Confidentiality: Good Practice in Handling Patient Information (2017).
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many M3 amphibious bridging vehicles were deployed during NATO exercises in each of the last 10 years; what the name of the (a) exercise and (b) unit was engaged in each of those exercises; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many M3 amphibious bridging vehicles were deployed during NATO exercises in each of the last 10 years; what the name of the (a) exercise and (b) unit was engaged in each of those exercises; and if he will make a statement.
As at 1 April 2017, we had 38 M3 amphibious bridging vehicles. We do not routinely comment on specific levels of readiness and specific locations for individual capabilities as to do so would compromise operational security, or would, or would be likely to, prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the Armed Forces.
38 UK M3 amphibious bridging vehicles have been based in Germany in each of the last 10 years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many M3 amphibious bridging vehicles were utilised in (a) Operation Iron Wolf and (b) Saber Guardian; what the names of the units utilising those vehicles were; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many M3 amphibious bridging vehicles were utilised in (a) Operation Iron Wolf and (b) Saber Guardian; what the names of the units utilising those vehicles were; and if he will make a statement.
As at 1 April 2017, we had 38 M3 amphibious bridging vehicles. We do not routinely comment on specific levels of readiness and specific locations for individual capabilities as to do so would compromise operational security, or would, or would be likely to, prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the Armed Forces.
38 UK M3 amphibious bridging vehicles have been based in Germany in each of the last 10 years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many M3 amphibious bridging vehicles have been based in Germany in each of the last 10 years; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many M3 amphibious bridging vehicles have been based in Germany in each of the last 10 years; and if he will make a statement.
As at 1 April 2017, we had 38 M3 amphibious bridging vehicles. We do not routinely comment on specific levels of readiness and specific locations for individual capabilities as to do so would compromise operational security, or would, or would be likely to, prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the Armed Forces.
38 UK M3 amphibious bridging vehicles have been based in Germany in each of the last 10 years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many M3 amphibious bridging vehicles (a) have been purchased, (b) are in service and (c) are held in reserve; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many M3 amphibious bridging vehicles (a) have been purchased, (b) are in service and (c) are held in reserve; and if he will make a statement.
As at 1 April 2017, we had 38 M3 amphibious bridging vehicles. We do not routinely comment on specific levels of readiness and specific locations for individual capabilities as to do so would compromise operational security, or would, or would be likely to, prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the Armed Forces.
38 UK M3 amphibious bridging vehicles have been based in Germany in each of the last 10 years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the risk assessment outcomes are which influenced his Department not to purchase the Battlefield Airborne Communications Node in order to facilitate secure signalling between the F35B and older aircraft; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the risk assessment outcomes are which influenced his Department not to purchase the Battlefield Airborne Communications Node in order to facilitate secure signalling between the F35B and older aircraft; and if he will make a statement.
The F-35 has all necessary communications to enable interoperability with other UK and NATO capabilities. The UK has conducted recent trials, with exceptional results, into understanding, and then maximizing, communications between advanced and legacy capabilities.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether the Link 16 communication channel for data sharing between F35B and older UK aircraft is a more secure data sharing channel than the BACN; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether the Link 16 communication channel for data sharing between F35B and older UK aircraft is a more secure data sharing channel than the BACN; and if he will make a statement.
Link 16 and the Battlefield Airborne Communications Node are both secure and encrypted systems. The Link 16 communications system is interoperable with other UK platforms and can communicate, securely and encrypted, with platforms such as Typhoon or the Queen Elizabeth Class carrier.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether the F35B is able to communicate with HMS Queen Elizabeth while in stealth mode; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether the F35B is able to communicate with HMS Queen Elizabeth while in stealth mode; and if he will make a statement.
The F35B Lightning will be able to communicate appropriately with the Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carriers.