Skip to main content

1-18 of 18 results for subject:Iraq

Answering member X
Lord Lyell of Markyate

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 April 1996
Reference
276 c764-5
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 April 1996
Reference
276 c764-5
House
House of Commons
What prosecutions have been initiated against alleged breaches of export control law regarding sales to Iraq or Iran since the publication of the Scott report.
Asked by
Llew Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
29 April 1996
Reference
25661; 276 c764-5
House
House of Commons

What prosecutions will follow the UNSCOM report on the involvement of British companies in supplying the Iraqi programmes developing weapons of mass destruction.

Asked by
Ann Clwyd (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 1996
Reference
20085; 273 c464W
House
House of Commons

What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G18.104 that the class claims made in the Matrix Churchill trial should have had no place in a criminal trial.

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 February 1996
Reference
16999; 272 c742W;272 c722W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to 272 c17, when he read the letter from the Deputy Prime Minister dated 11th September; and various other questions on same.

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 February 1996
Reference
272 c743W;272 c723W; 16990;16992;16991;16989
House
House of Commons

What further assessment he makes of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G13.125 page 1396 in respect of his legal and constitutional responsibility to promote the public interest; and various other questions on same.

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 February 1996
Reference
272 c740-1W;272 c720-1W; 16996;16994;16993
House
House of Commons

What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G18.58 in respect of Viscount Simon's judgment in Duncan v Cammell Laird, 1942/

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 February 1996
Reference
17004; 272 c741W;272 c721W
House
House of Commons

What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G18.60 that government is entitled to authorise the disclosure of its confidential or secret documents.

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 February 1996
Reference
17005; 272 c741W;272 c721W
House
House of Commons

What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G18.66 that his advice was without sound legal foundation; and what assessment AG has made of Sir Richard Scotts conclusion in section G18.54 that his views on Ministers legal duties to claim PII were based on a fundamental...

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 February 1996
Reference
272 c741-2W;272 c721-2W; 16998;16997
House
House of Commons

What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G13.17 that the ability of the prosecution to introduce evidence within a PII class without making it available to the defence is one-sided.

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 February 1996
Reference
17324; 272 c742W;272 c722W
House
House of Commons

What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in sections G13.113 and 115 that Ministers should inform the court if they have views on disclosure; and various other questions on same.

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 February 1996
Reference
272 c743-4W;272 c723-4W; 17003;17323;17001;17002
House
House of Commons

On what dates in 1990 meetings were held with representatives of Customs and Excise to discuss the prosecution of Chris Cowley and Peter Mitchell for allegedly breaking the arms embargo with Iraq and Iran; and on what date senior Treasury counsel provided advice on the question of bringing a prosecution...

Asked by
Stephen Byers (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 1995
Reference
262 c811W
House
House of Commons
To comment on use of public interest immunity certificates. -
Asked by
Barbara Roche (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 1994
Reference
242 c14
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 April 1994
Reference
242 c14
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 April 1994
Reference
242 c14
House
House of Commons

What precedents he considered in preparing his advice for Ministers to sign public interest immunity certificates in relation to the Matrix Churchill case.

Asked by
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 December 1992
Reference
215 c195W
House
House of Commons

What documents were given by the Law Officers' Departments to HM Customs and Excise before it prosecuted Matrix Churchill; on what dates the documents were given; what was the source of any such documents provided.

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 November 1992
Reference
214 c543W;214 c547W
House
House of Commons