Skip to main content

1-19 of 19 results for subject:"Undocumented migrants"

Year X
2006
Subject X
Foreign nationals

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am not able to comment on individual cases within the House. I apologise for the delay in responding to the hon. Gentleman. I was able to update him this morning.
Answered by
Liam Byrne (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 June 2006
Reference
447 c1047
House
House of Commons
I hear the Minister’s response. This foul crime, committed two years ago, caused much concern locally, and all we wanted to know was the whereabouts of the dangerous individual after he was released. Despite writing to the then Home Secretary in April, asking written questions on 10 May, 17 May and 14 June and phoning the Home Office, I hit a wall of silence. It has taken the Minister being dragged to the Dispatch Box to get a simple answer to a simple question. Given the Prime Minister’s promise of transparency on this issue, will the Minister explain why I received no responses to my named-day written questions? Does this case not show that the Government have failed to reassure the public on the foreign prisoners’ crisis?
Asked by
John Baron (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 June 2006
Reference
447 c1047
House
House of Commons
The lack of response that was accorded to the hon. Gentleman’s inquiries was completely unacceptable. In my view, it highlighted again some of the failings on which my right hon. Friend the Home Secretary has briefed the House. The processes to which the hon. Gentleman alludes will be part of the review that we are undertaking over the next month and a half.
Answered by
Liam Byrne (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 June 2006
Reference
447 c1047
House
House of Commons
What progress he has made in ascertaining the whereabouts of Mr. Tawanda Machingura, an illegal immigrant imprisoned for sexual assault of a mental health patient whilst working as a nurse in a local NHS hospital.
Asked by
John Baron (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
19 June 2006
Reference
447 c1047; 77870
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I thank everyone who has taken part in this debate, particularly the Minister who defended her department exactly as we expected. It was, if I may say so, not exactly the flavour of the debate. She said precious little about the 1,000 foreign prisoners, the illegal immigrants, the scene at the open...

Member
Lord Fowler (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2006
Reference
682 c1467
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join my voice to all those who have commended the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, for introducing this debate. I thank him, in particular, for the kind compliments that he made to me. I assure him that if, when I am no longer privileged to represent the Government at the Dispatch Box, he...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2006
Reference
682 c1463-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, congratulate my noble friend on initiating this debate. The Home Office faces a serious crisis. It has been the subject of extensive criticism. To say that is nothing new; criticisms have been levelled for decades. What is different this time round is, first, the scale of...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2006
Reference
682 c1455-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we owe a debt of gratitude to my noble friend Lord Fowler for giving us this opportunity to consider some of the disastrous failures by the Home Office in recent weeks. They have cost the Home Secretary his job, which he had been in for only 16 months. But the problems...

Member
Lord Marlesford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2006
Reference
682 c1452-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I also thank my noble friend Lord Fowler for giving the House this timely opportunity to consider the role of the Home Office, which has been engulfed by a series of crises in recent months. It is a great department of state and it should maintain internal peace and order...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2006
Reference
682 c1460-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I add my thanks to the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, for securing this debate. I do not in any way underestimate how much the Home Office is in turmoil today. The events of the past few weeks are a clear demonstration that all is not well. Many of us remember that...

Member
Lord Dholakia (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2006
Reference
682 c1457-60
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, for initiating this worthwhile and timely debate. His experience in these matters is hard to match in longevity or depth. The Home Office is one of the great departments of state. Many distinguished people have held the post, not just of...

Member
Baroness Stern (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2006
Reference
682 c1449-52
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, for giving us the opportunity to debate Home Office issues. I congratulate him on responding to his leader’s call earlier in the week to stop dumping on the public sector and on not making the same mistake as the leader of his party, who...

Member
Lord Corbett of Castle Vale (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2006
Reference
682 c1441-4
House
House of Lords

rose to call attention to the role of the Home Office; and to move for Papers. The noble Lord said: My Lords, there could hardly be a more relevant time to debate the role of the Home Office, given the events of the past few months. I am delighted that the noble...

Member
Lord Fowler (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2006
Reference
682 c1437-41
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I suppose I have to declare an interest in this subject, because for five and a half years I worked in the Home Office as a Crown official. I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, on obtaining this debate on a subject of great importance, and that is not just repaying the kind...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2006
Reference
682 c1444-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham. He and I have known each other for many years. In his previous guise we overlapped directly in relation to prisons in Northern Ireland, when I was the chairman of the Select Committee for the Province and he appeared as...

Member
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2006
Reference
682 c1446-9
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the role of the Home Office. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Fowler
Answering member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates
Date
8 June 2006
Reference
682 c1437-67
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Notes
See also NAO report HC 76 2005-06
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
HC 620 2005-06
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what estimate he has made of the number of aliens in the country who are removable but are not required to sign on regularly at his Department or at police stations.

Asked by
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 January 2006
Reference
441 c1096W; 38500
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the feasibility of removing all those individuals in the country who do not have leave to remain but who have not yet had removal action taken against them.

Asked by
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 January 2006
Reference
38501; 441 c1096-7W
House
House of Commons