1-20 of 151 results for subject:Population
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.26 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Population
- We searched for
- subject_t:Population OR subject_ses:92512
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer which 50 (a) local authority areas and (b) parliamentary constituencies had the highest annual change in population numbers in each of the last five years; and what the percentage change was in each case.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer which 50 (a) local authority areas and (b) parliamentary constituencies had the highest annual change in population numbers in each of the last five years; and what the percentage change was in each case.
| 50 local authorities in the UK with the highest estimated population change in the years to mid-2001 and mid-2002 | |
|---|---|
| Local authority | Percentage change |
| Mid-2000 to mid-2001 | |
| City of London | 4.9 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 4.9 |
| Westminster | 3.5 |
| Camden | 3.3 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 3.0 |
| Daventry | 2.6 |
| Taunton Deane | 2.4 |
| Armagh | 2.4 |
| Ballymoney | 2.4 |
| North Kesteven | 2.3 |
| Banbridge | 2.3 |
| West Wiltshire | 2.2 |
| Tower Hamlets | 2.0 |
| Harborough | 2.0 |
| East Northamptonshire | 1.9 |
| Isles of Scilly | 1.9 |
| Hackney | 1.9 |
| Torridge | 1.9 |
| Cookstown | 1.8 |
| Brent | 1.8 |
| Telford And Wrekin UA | 1.7 |
| Limavady | 1.7 |
| Warwick | 1.7 |
| Newry and Mourne | 1.7 |
| Rushmoor | 1.7 |
| Ashford | 1.6 |
| Newham | 1.6 |
| Kennet | 1.6 |
| Richmondshire | 1.6 |
| Southwark | 1.6 |
| Merton | 1.5 |
| Maldon | 1.5 |
| Wandsworth | 1.5 |
| Oswestry | 1.5 |
| South Holland | 1.5 |
| South Northamptonshire | 1.4 |
| Greenwich | 1.4 |
| South Cambridgeshire | 1.4 |
| Rugby | 1.4 |
| Milton Keynes UA | 1.4 |
| Bedford | 1.3 |
| North Cornwall | 1.3 |
| Rutland UA | 1.3 |
| South Derbyshire | 1.3 |
| Carrick | 1.3 |
| Broxbourne | 1.3 |
| West Lothian | 1.3 |
| Thurrock UA | 1.3 |
| West Lindsey | 1.2 |
| Lambeth | 1.2 |
| Mid-2001 to mid-2002 | |
| Westminster | 5.4 |
| City of London | 4.6 |
| Richmondshire | 3.9 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 3.8 |
| North Kesteven | 2.9 |
| Warwick | 2.8 |
| Oxford | 2.5 |
| South Northamptonshire | 2.5 |
| Camden | 2.2 |
| Daventry | 2.1 |
| South Derbyshire | 2.1 |
| West Lindsey | 2.0 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 2.0 |
| Banbridge | 1.9 |
| Harborough | 1.9 |
| Restormel | 1.9 |
| North Shropshire | 1.8 |
| Cambridge | 1.8 |
| Stratford-on-Avon | 1.8 |
| Moyle | 1.8 |
| Limavady | 1.7 |
| Ballymoney | 1.7 |
| Tower Hamlets | 1.7 |
| East Northamptonshire | 1.7 |
| Omagh | 1.7 |
| Greenwich | 1.7 |
| North Cornwall | 1.7 |
| South Holland | 1.7 |
| Ribble Valley | 1.6 |
| East Lindsey | 1.6 |
| West Wiltshire | 1.6 |
| East Cambridgeshire | 1.5 |
| Canterbury | 1.5 |
| Ashford | 1.4 |
| Rugby | 1.4 |
| Ceredigion UA | 1.4 |
| Isles Of Scilly | 1.4 |
| Elmbridge | 1.4 |
| Haringey | 1.4 |
| Rutland UA | 1.4 |
| Torridge | 1.4 |
| Forest Heath | 1.4 |
| Boston | 1.3 |
| Manchester | 1.3 |
| Kerrier | 1.3 |
| Newry and Mourne | 1.3 |
| Magherafelt | 1.3 |
| Bromsgrove | 1.3 |
| Richmond Upon Thames | 1.3 |
| Taunton Deane | 1.2 |
| Source: | |
| Office for National Statistics |
| 50 local authorities in the UK with the highest estimated population change in the years to mid-2003 and mid-2004 | |
|---|---|
| Local authority | Percentage change |
| Mid-2002 to mid-2003 | |
| East Cambridgeshire | 4.6 |
| City of London | 4.5 |
| Forest Heath | 3.8 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 3.6 |
| Westminster | 3.6 |
| Cambridge | 2.6 |
| Oxford | 2.5 |
| Warwick | 2.4 |
| South Derbyshire | 2.3 |
| Richmondshire | 2.1 |
| North Dorset | 2.1 |
| East Northamptonshire | 2.0 |
| North Kesteven | 2.0 |
| West Lindsey | 1.9 |
| Pembrokeshire UA | 1.9 |
| South Holland | 1.8 |
| Mid Bedfordshire | 1.8 |
| Camden | 1.8 |
| Banbridge | 1.7 |
| South Cambridgeshire | 1.7 |
| Ribble Valley | 1.7 |
| Daventry | 1.7 |
| Rutland UA | 1.6 |
| Fenland | 1.6 |
| Torridge | 1.6 |
| Restormel | 1.5 |
| Canterbury | 1.5 |
| Richmond upon Thames | 1.5 |
| Eden | 1.5 |
| Stratford-on-Avon | 1.5 |
| Newark and Sherwood | 1.5 |
| West Dorset | 1.4 |
| Breckland | 1.4 |
| South Northamptonshire | 1.4 |
| Hart | 1.4 |
| Winchester | 1.4 |
| Ashford | 1.3 |
| Omagh | 1.3 |
| Cotswold | 1.3 |
| Kettering | 1.3 |
| West Wiltshire | 1.3 |
| Isle Of Wight UA | 1.3 |
| Colchester | 1.2 |
| Newry and Mourne | 1.2 |
| Exeter | 1.2 |
| Kerrier | 1.2 |
| South Shropshire | 1.2 |
| East Lindsey | 1.2 |
| Oswestry | 1.2 |
| Ballymoney | 1.2 |
| Mid-2003 to mid-2004 | |
| City of London | 7.0 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 5.6 |
| Westminster | 3.6 |
| Cambridge | 3.2 |
| Camden | 3.0 |
| Warwick | 2.7 |
| Rutland UA | 2.5 |
| Down | 2.4 |
| Richmond upon Thames | 2.0 |
| Oxford | 1.9 |
| Eden | 1.8 |
| Forest Heath | 1.8 |
| South Northamptonshire | 1.8 |
| Torridge | 1.8 |
| Mid Devon | 1.7 |
| Ashford | 1.7 |
| Copeland | 1.7 |
| Mid Bedfordshire | 1.7 |
| Carlisle | 1.7 |
| Huntingdonshire | 1.6 |
| Exeter | 1.6 |
| East Devon | 1.6 |
| Ballymoney | 1.6 |
| Durham | 1.6 |
| Banbridge | 1.6 |
| South Holland | 1.6 |
| Isle Of Wight UA | 1.6 |
| North Kesteven | 1.5 |
| Aberdeenshire | 1.5 |
| West Lindsey | 1.5 |
| Canterbury | 1.5 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 1.5 |
| Richmondshire | 1.4 |
| South Shropshire | 1.4 |
| Kennet | 1.4 |
| Newark and Sherwood | 1.4 |
| East Lindsey | 1.4 |
| West Devon | 1.4 |
| Fenland | 1.3 |
| Ribble Valley | 1.3 |
| Charnwood | 1.3 |
| West Wiltshire | 1.3 |
| Stratford-on-Avon | 1.3 |
| Tower Hamlets | 1.3 |
| Mid Suffolk | 1.3 |
| Limavady | 1.3 |
| South Derbyshire | 1.3 |
| Boston | 1.3 |
| St. Edmundsbury | 1.3 |
| Winchester | 1.3 |
| Source: | |
| Office for National Statistics |
| 50 local authorities in the UK with the highest estimated population change in the year to mid-2005 | |
|---|---|
| Local authority | Percentage change |
| Mid-2004 to mid-2005 | |
| City of London | 6.7 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 6.6 |
| Westminster | 6.2 |
| Forest Heath | 5.0 |
| Cambridge | 4.7 |
| Camden | 4.2 |
| Oxford | 3.2 |
| Warwick | 2.9 |
| Dungannon | 2.9 |
| Newcastle upon Tyne | 2.6 |
| Banbridge | 2.3 |
| South Northamptonshire | 2.3 |
| Rutland UA | 2.2 |
| Elmbridge | 2.2 |
| East Cambridgeshire | 2.2 |
| Ashford | 2.1 |
| Norwich | 2.1 |
| Exeter | 2.1 |
| Welwyn Hatfield | 2.0 |
| Richmond upon Thames | 1.9 |
| Stratford-on-Avon | 1.9 |
| Mid Bedfordshire | 1.9 |
| Tower Hamlets | 1.8 |
| Craigavon | 1.8 |
| Wands Worth | 1.8 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 1.7 |
| Redbridge | 1.7 |
| Charnwood | 1.7 |
| Ballymoney | 1.7 |
| Durham | 1.7 |
| Colchester | 1.6 |
| Armagh | 1.6 |
| Carlisle | 1.6 |
| South Cambridgeshire | 1.6 |
| Rugby | 1.6 |
| Eden | 1.5 |
| Islington | 1.5 |
| Canterbury | 1.5 |
| Hillingdon | 1.5 |
| Oswestry | 1.5 |
| Mid Suffolk | 1.5 |
| Newry and Mourne | 1.4 |
| Runnymede | 1.4 |
| Antrim | 1.4 |
| Tonbridge and Malling | 1.4 |
| South Derbyshire | 1.4 |
| Breckland | 1.4 |
| Windsor and Maidenhead UA | 1.3 |
| South Bucks | 1.3 |
| Hart | 1.3 |
| Source: | |
| Office for National Statistics |
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what forecast he has made of the population of Peterborough city council area in (a) five, (b) 10 and (c) 15 years time.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what forecast he has made of the population of Peterborough city council area in (a) five, (b) 10 and (c) 15 years time.
| Table 1: Projected population of Peterborough city council area in 5,10 and 15 years time | |
|---|---|
| Projected population (Thousand) | |
| 2011 | 163 |
| 2016 | 166 |
| 2021 | 169 |
| Source: | |
| Office for National Statistics, 2004-based subnational population projections |
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the population was of Newcastle upon Tyne in (a) 2003-04, (b) 2004-05 and (c) 2005-06; and what population projections have been made by the Office of National Statistics for that city in each of the next three financial years.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the population was of Newcastle upon Tyne in (a) 2003-04, (b) 2004-05 and (c) 2005-06; and what population projections have been made by the Office of National Statistics for that city in each of the next three financial years.
| Table 1: Population estimates and subnational population projections for Newcastle-upon-Tyne | ||
|---|---|---|
| Thousand | ||
| Mid-year population estimates | 2004-based population projections | |
| 2003 | 267 | — |
| 2004 | 269 | 269 |
| 2005 | 276 | 272 |
| 2006 | — | 273 |
| 2007 | — | 274 |
| 2008 | — | 275 |
| 2009 | — | 276 |
| Source: Office for National Statistics |
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what population projections for the City of Newcastle upon Tyne for the years 2003 to 2010 are in use; on which years' data each projection was based; and what the mid-year estimate of the population was in each year between 2003 and 2005.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what population projections for the City of Newcastle upon Tyne for the years 2003 to 2010 are in use; on which years' data each projection was based; and what the mid-year estimate of the population was in each year between 2003 and 2005.
| Table 1: Subnational population projections for Newcastle-upon-Tyne | ||
|---|---|---|
| Thousand | ||
| 2003-based projection | 2004-based projection | |
| 2003 | 267 | — |
| 2004 | 265 | 269 |
| 2005 | 265 | 272 |
| 2006 | 264 | 273 |
| 2007 | 263 | 274 |
| 2008 | 263 | 275 |
| 2009 | 262 | 276 |
| 2010 | 262 | 277 |
| Source: | ||
| Office for National Statistics |
| Table 2: Population estimates for Newcastle-upon-Tyne | |
|---|---|
| Population (thousand) | |
| 2003 | 267 |
| 2004 | 269 |
| 2005 | 276 |
| Note: | |
| Population estimates for mid 2005 are the latest available estimates. | |
| Source: | |
| Office for National Statistics |
Does my hon. Friend agree that other areas are also particularly affected in a similar way, such as my constituency? There has been a chronic understating of population figures in my constituency, and a ping-pong debate with the Minister concerning that understatement and the inadequacy of the figures from the...
Does my hon. Friend agree that other areas are also particularly affected in a similar way, such as my constituency? There has been a chronic understating of population figures in my constituency, and a ping-pong debate with the Minister concerning that understatement and the inadequacy of the figures from the...
I am delighted to have been selected to introduce this debate, which will contain some complex statistical matter, although I hope not to test your patience too far, Mr. Jones. The part of west London that I have the privilege to represent has an excellent record of harmonious community relationships....
I am delighted to have been selected to introduce this debate, which will contain some complex statistical matter, although I hope not to test your patience too far, Mr. Jones. The part of west London that I have the privilege to represent has an excellent record of harmonious community relationships....
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. I am a strong believer in the contribution that the recent migrants have made to our national economy, but an important point to make on top of my hon. Friend’s point is that most of their contribution—in higher tax revenues and national insurance contributions—goes...
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. I am a strong believer in the contribution that the recent migrants have made to our national economy, but an important point to make on top of my hon. Friend’s point is that most of their contribution—in higher tax revenues and national insurance contributions—goes...
I thank my hon. Friend for giving way and congratulate him on securing this important debate. Does he agree that there seems to be a disparity in some geographical hot spots throughout the country, both urban and rural, between the economic benefits of mass migration from the EU10 and its...
I thank my hon. Friend for giving way and congratulate him on securing this important debate. Does he agree that there seems to be a disparity in some geographical hot spots throughout the country, both urban and rural, between the economic benefits of mass migration from the EU10 and its...
My hon. Friend is quite right. Others also have the same problem, which is by no means unique to my constituency or local authority. I have spoken with officers in Westminster city council and with London Councils, which used to be known as the Association of London Government. Slough borough...
My hon. Friend is quite right. Others also have the same problem, which is by no means unique to my constituency or local authority. I have spoken with officers in Westminster city council and with London Councils, which used to be known as the Association of London Government. Slough borough...
The hon. Gentleman said in his speech that his authority was not unique—that the problem applied also to Enfield and no doubt to other authorities. Perhaps I may respond to the hon. Gentleman by sending him more information on this important subject. Briefly, there are two points to consider. First,...
The hon. Gentleman said in his speech that his authority was not unique—that the problem applied also to Enfield and no doubt to other authorities. Perhaps I may respond to the hon. Gentleman by sending him more information on this important subject. Briefly, there are two points to consider. First,...
I realise that time is short, but I want to take the Minister back to a point that he made earlier. He said that funding settlements can be altered only in exceptional circumstances. I appreciate what he is saying about the stability provided by projecting forward, which was certainly welcome...
I realise that time is short, but I want to take the Minister back to a point that he made earlier. He said that funding settlements can be altered only in exceptional circumstances. I appreciate what he is saying about the stability provided by projecting forward, which was certainly welcome...
Congratulations are due to the hon. Member for Hammersmith and Fulham (Mr. Hands) on securing this debate, and to the hon. Members for Peterborough (Mr. Jackson) and for Enfield, Southgate (Mr. Burrowes) on their interventions. The debate gives me the opportunity to put on the record the effect of population...
Congratulations are due to the hon. Member for Hammersmith and Fulham (Mr. Hands) on securing this debate, and to the hon. Members for Peterborough (Mr. Jackson) and for Enfield, Southgate (Mr. Burrowes) on their interventions. The debate gives me the opportunity to put on the record the effect of population...
Westminster Hall adjournment debate on the effects of population growth between censuses on local government finance.
Westminster Hall adjournment debate on the effects of population growth between censuses on local government finance.
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether a race equality impact assessment was undertaken on the decision to use current methodology for population projections in the local government funding system.
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether a race equality impact assessment was undertaken on the decision to use current methodology for population projections in the local government funding system.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what percentage of the population of (a) England, (b) Surrey, (c) Reigate constituency and (d) the borough of Reigate and Banstead is aged over 65 years.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what percentage of the population of (a) England, (b) Surrey, (c) Reigate constituency and (d) the borough of Reigate and Banstead is aged over 65 years.
| Table 1: Total population and percentage of population of those aged 65 and over Mid-2005 population estimate | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Local Authority | Total population | Population aged 65+ | Percentage population aged 65+ |
| England | 50,431 | 8,058,100 | 16.0 |
| Surrey | 1,075,500 | 176,900 | 16.4 |
| Borough of Reigate and Banstead | 127,200 | 20,700 | 16.3 |
| Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest 100. Source: | |||
| Office for National Statistics |
| Table 2: Total population and percentage of population of those aged 65 and over, based on the 2001 Census | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parliamentary constituency | Total population | Population aged 65+ | Percentage population aged 65+ |
| Reigate constituency | 87,665 | 14,569 | 16.6 |
| Note: The data have been taken from KS02 in the Census 2001 Report for Parliamentary Constituencies which is available in the House of Commons Library. Source: Office for National Statistics. |
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the mid year estimates made in (a) 2003, (b) 2004 and (c) 2005 were of the population in the city of Newcastle upon Tyne; and what the estimates of future population were for each year.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the mid year estimates made in (a) 2003, (b) 2004 and (c) 2005 were of the population in the city of Newcastle upon Tyne; and what the estimates of future population were for each year.
| Table 1: Mid-2003 to mid-2005 population estimates and mid-2006 to mid-2025 population projections (2004-based) | |
|---|---|
| Thousand | |
| Newcastle upon Tyne | |
| Population estimates | |
| Mid-2003 | 266.6 |
| Mid-2004 | 269.5 |
| Mid-2005 | 276.4 |
| Population projections¹ | |
| Mid-2006 | 273.3 |
| Mid-2007 | 274.5 |
| Mid-2008 | 275.4 |
| Mid-2009 | 276.3 |
| Mid-2010 | 277.2 |
| Mid-2015 | 280.8 |
| Mid-2020 | 283.9 |
| Mid-2025 | 287.5 |
| ¹ The population projections shown in this table are taken from the 2004-based subnational population projections, the latest set of projections currently available. Therefore they are not consistent with the 2005 mid year estimates and there is a discontinuity in the series as presented between years 2005 and 2006. Source: Office for National Statistics |
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) how much has been spent on the Improving Migration Population Statistics programme each year since the 2001 census, broken down by main budget heading;
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) how much has been spent on the Improving Migration Population Statistics programme each year since the 2001 census, broken down by main budget heading;
| £000 | |||
| 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006-07 (planned) | |
| IMPS research | 442 | 541 | 508 |
| Migration | 166 | 283 | 429 |
| Population definitions | 62 | 85 | 119 |
| Total | 670 | 909 | 1056 |
(2) how much was spent on the Office for National Statistics’ Task Group to investigate migration using central data sources, broken down by main budget heading.
(2) how much was spent on the Office for National Statistics’ Task Group to investigate migration using central data sources, broken down by main budget heading.
| £000 | |||
| 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006-07 (planned) | |
| IMPS research | 442 | 541 | 508 |
| Migration | 166 | 283 | 429 |
| Population definitions | 62 | 85 | 119 |
| Total | 670 | 909 | 1056 |
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer for what purposes mid-year population estimates are used other than for local government finance.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer for what purposes mid-year population estimates are used other than for local government finance.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer which local authorities have been identified by the Office for National Statistics as being affected by flawed population statistics.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer which local authorities have been identified by the Office for National Statistics as being affected by flawed population statistics.