Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,134 results for subject:"Ministerial powers"

Year X
2017

Type

+ Legislation (2) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Bills (1) + Public bills (1)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Members' contributions (1,066)
-
Business questions (1)
-
Maiden speeches (1)
-
Oral answers to questions (1)
+ Oral questions (1)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,064)
+ Parliamentary committees (44) + Committee proceedings (12)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (4)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (6)
-
Select Committee reports (31)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (9)
-
Select Committee written evidence (1)
+ Parliamentary papers (42)
-
Command papers (3)
-
Consultation papers (2)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (1)
-
Deposited papers (3)
-
House of Commons papers (5)
-
House of Lords papers (31)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (22) + Debates (16) + Committee proceedings (12)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (4)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (6)
+ Legislative debates (10)
-
Debates on bills (9)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
+ Statements (6) + Oral statements (2)
-
Ministerial statements (2)
-
Written statements (4)
+ Parliamentary questions (3)
-
Business questions (1)
+ Oral questions (1)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Written questions (1)
+ Research briefings (4) + Commons Briefing papers (4)
-
Briefing papers on bills (3)

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether his Department provides guidance that sets out the circumstances under which a Secretary of State can instruct an independent regulator to reconsider a decision it has already taken.

Asked by
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 December 2017
Reference
120443
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee
Date
21 December 2017
Reference
HL 58 2017-19
House
House of Lords

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Yvette Cooper (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2017
Reference
633 c404
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 c190
House
House of Commons

I thought for a minute, Mrs Laing, that you were going to read out all the amendments grouped today, which might have taken up some considerable time.

Today’s debate is about taking back control—about Parliament and the powers of the House of Commons to hold the Executive to account and to...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 c215
House
House of Commons

We were told that we were bringing powers back to this Parliament so that this Parliament could take decisions. Why, then, are the Government trying to introduce something similar to the Henry VIII clause? Does it not make a mockery of their promises?

Member
Jim Cunningham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 c215
House
House of Commons

Exactly. People voting in the referendum might have been moved by that slogan “take back control”, but I do not honestly think many voters thought that that meant taking back control from a European Executive and handing it to Ministers of the Crown, outwith the powers and scope of Parliament...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 cc215-6
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend, like me, will have read in the newspapers about the Cabinet split opening up on divergence, with various Cabinet Ministers backing divergence and others not. How does he think this squares with the Prime Minister’s promise to our European partners and the Government of the Republic of...

Member
Mary Creagh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 c216
House
House of Commons

I suspect that the European Commission and the Republic of Ireland Government saw the phrase “full alignment” and thought that full alignment meant full alignment. It turns out from the Prime Minister’s statement yesterday that full alignment does not quite mean full alignment. She said it only meant aligning the...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 c216
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Mary Creagh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 c216
House
House of Commons

I do not want to digress at this stage. I want to focus particularly on the powers that Ministers are taking in clause 7, if my hon. Friend will allow me to do so.

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 c216
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 c216
House
House of Commons

I cannot resist.

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 c216
House
House of Commons

Ministers have assured us that if they want to change policy—if, for instance, they see a need for a new fishing policy, or a new customs and trade policy—there will be primary legislation and full parliamentary debates in both Houses. Does the hon. Gentleman not understand that? We are dealing...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 c216
House
House of Commons

It is touching that the right hon. Gentleman takes those assurances from Ministers at face value, but the Ministers may not be here for very much longer. Who knows? If we are going to make policy changes, that should be done in a Bill that comes before Parliament, or in...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 cc216-7
House
House of Commons

When statutes are being considered and Bills are being drafted, there does on occasion come a point at which we must accept that assurances given, for example, at the Dispatch Box will have to complement the inevitable small grey areas. However, that should not prevent us as a Parliament from...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 c217
House
House of Commons

That is why Members often say in the House, “Let us place it on the face of the Bill”, which means “Let us put in writing, in black and white, something that can then be held up in a court of law”, rather than a mere verbal promise from a...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 c217
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Member for Wokingham (John Redwood) referred to Bills relating to, for instance, trade and customs. Does the hon. Gentleman agree that that those Bills are very likely to contain the very same Henry VIII powers?

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 c217
House
House of Commons

Indeed. There are, I think, eight pieces of subsequent legislation which are also opening up this precedent. Effectively, Members of Parliament are being patted on the head and told, “Do not trouble yourselves. We will sort out all these areas of policy. We will just go away and if you...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 cc217-8
House
House of Commons

It is not just a question of assurances given from the Dispatch Box. In clause 9, Ministers are proposing to take a power that would enable them, after the event, to get rid of what they have described as safeguards in the Bill if they feel like it, by means...

Member
Hilary Benn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
633 c218
House
House of Commons