1-20 of 1,335 results for subject:Prisons
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.401 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.008 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Prisons
- We searched for
- subject_t:Prisons OR subject_ses:92582
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many drones were discovered in the prison estate in 2016.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many drones were discovered in the prison estate in 2016.
I refer the Rt Hon member to PQ 4436, answered on 17 July 2017.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many external medical appointments have been missed by prisoners due to insufficient numbers of prison staff in the last 12 months.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many external medical appointments have been missed by prisoners due to insufficient numbers of prison staff in the last 12 months.
This information is not held or published centrally.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many women in prison have been refused a place in a mother and baby unit in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many women in prison have been refused a place in a mother and baby unit in each of the last five years.
The table below details the number of applications that were made for a place on a prison mother and baby unit in the last five financial years, together with the number of applications approved and refused.
Table: Mother & Baby Units (MBU) Management Information, by year 2010/11 to 2016/171
| 2012/13 | 2013/14 | 2014/15 | 2015/16 | 2016/17 |
Number of applications received for admission to MBU | 215 | 210 | 197 | 144 | 119 |
Number of applications approved by a board2 | 114 | 80 | 74 | 69 | 61 |
Number of applications refused by a board2 | 33 | 28 | 32 | 41 | 16 |
(1) Figures are management information drawn from administrative data systems. They are provisional figures and subject to change following final quality assurance. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system.
(2) Not all applications to MBUs will be approved or refused, many will not proceed for other reasons. Applications may not be assessed in the month in which they are received.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, on how many occasions a private transport provider (a) cancelled and (b) postponed scheduled transport between prisons in each of the least five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, on how many occasions a private transport provider (a) cancelled and (b) postponed scheduled transport between prisons in each of the least five years.
The number of cancellations of scheduled transport for prisoners between prisons for the last 5 calendar years is provided in the table below.
| Number of prisoners moved between prisons | Number of cancellations | Total | Percentage cancelled |
2013 | 71,504 | 17,510 | 89,014 | 19.7% |
2014 | 70,625 | 22,705 | 93,330 | 24.3% |
2015 | 68,890 | 22,106 | 90,996 | 24.3% |
2016 | 69,556 | 24,590 | 94,146 | 26.1% |
2017 to date | 60,682 | 19,622 | 80,304 | 24.4% |
Movement between prisons is robustly managed and cancellations occur for a broad range of operational reasons that include prisoner refusal, operational difficulties within discharging or receiving prison taking prioritisation, prisoner requiring medical treatment, and traffic delays en route.
Data for postponed transport is not recorded centrally.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many mobile phones or sim cards were found in each prison in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many mobile phones or sim cards were found in each prison in each of the last five years.
The information requested was provided in response to PQ 64325, which was answered on 17 February 2016.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, on how many occasions wings of private prisons have been closed as a result of insufficient availability of staff in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, on how many occasions wings of private prisons have been closed as a result of insufficient availability of staff in each of the last five years.
This information is not held centrally and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. We require privately managed prisons to have a sufficient number of staff to maintain a safe and secure prison. We have robust processes in place to closely monitor and manage private providers and will not hesitate to take action when standards fall short. |
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether he has undertaken a risk assessment of the unplanned closures of sections of prisons as a result of insufficient availability of staff.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether he has undertaken a risk assessment of the unplanned closures of sections of prisons as a result of insufficient availability of staff.
Governors and senior operational staff in prisons proactively manage the risk of unplanned closures and the effects on safety, staffing levels and delivery of effective regimes. The regime management plan was developed specifically to provide a tool to assist in this.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, which prisons use the Basic Custody Screening Tool; and if he will place in the Library a copy of the data collected by that too in the last 12 months with personally identifiable information removed.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, which prisons use the Basic Custody Screening Tool; and if he will place in the Library a copy of the data collected by that too in the last 12 months with personally identifiable information removed.
We have an established network of resettlement prisons which are used to facilitate the transition from custody into the community, to enable Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) to work with those prisoners returning to their local area. The Basic Custody Screening Tool (BCST) is completed in all of these resettlement prisons at the beginning of a prisoner’s custodial sentence. It is not completed in non-resettlement prisons. A list of resettlement prisons is attached.
From the BCST records held centrally, removal of personally identifiable information could only be carried out at disproportionate cost. As you will appreciate it would not be appropriate to release the raw data as recorded, given the potential sensitivity of those records and indeed the regulations of the Data Protection Act.
List of resettlement prisons in England and Wales
HMP Altcourse | HMP Kirklevington Grange | |
HMP Askham Grange | HMP Lancaster Farms | |
HMP Bedford | HMP Leeds | |
HMP Belmarsh | HMP Leicester | |
HMP Berwyn | HMP Lewes | |
HMP Birmingham | HMP Leyhill | |
HMPYOI Brinsford | HMP Lincoln | |
HMP Bristol | HMP Liverpool | |
HMP Brixton | HMP Low Newton | |
HMP Bronzefield | HMP Manchester | |
HMP Bullingdon | HMP Moorland | |
HMP Cardiff | HMP Mount | |
HMP Channings Wood | HMP New Hall | |
HMP Chelmsford | HMP North Sea Camp | |
HMP Coldingley | HMP Northumberland | |
HMP Doncaster | HMP Norwich | |
HMP Dovegate | HMP Nottingham | |
HMP Downview | HMP Oakwood | |
HMP Drake Hall | HMP Onley | |
HMP Durham | HMP Parc | |
HMP East Sutton Park | HMP Pentonville | |
HMP Eastwood Park | HMP Peterborough | |
HMP Elmley | HMP Portland | |
HMP Exeter | HMP Preston | |
HMP Featherstone | HMP Ranby | |
HMPYOI Feltham | HMP Risley | |
HMP Ford | HMP Rochester | |
HMP Forest Bank | HMP Send | |
HMP Foston Hall | HMP Standford Hill | |
HMP Grendon/Spring Hill | HMP Stoke Heath | |
HMP Guys Marsh | HMP Styal | |
HMP Hatfield | HMP Sudbury | |
HMP Haverigg | HMP Swansea | |
HMP Hewell | HMP Thameside | |
HMP High Down | HMP Thorn Cross | |
HMP Highpoint | HMP Usk / Prescoed | |
HMP Hindley | HMP Wandsworth | |
HMP Hollesley Bay | HMP Wayland | |
HMP Holme House | HMP Wealstun | |
HMP Hull | HMP Winchester | |
HMP Humber | HMP Woodhill | |
HMP Isis | HMP Wormwood Scrubs | |
HMP Kirkham | ||
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, on how many occasions wings of prisons have been closed due to insufficient staff levels in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, on how many occasions wings of prisons have been closed due to insufficient staff levels in each of the last five years.
The information obtained could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. The Government is fully committed to making our prisons safe and is actively taking the measures necessary to ensure that. We are boosting the number of prison officers by 2,500 and we have already reached the halfway mark over the past year with a further 1,211 candidates who have received job offers. In addition to that, we are also giving officers the tools they need to manage violent offenders – investing in body-worn cameras, new style handcuffs and piloting PAVA incapacitant spray. |
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the change has been to the prisons budget in real terms in each year since 2010; and what the projected change will be in real terms in each year to 2022.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the change has been to the prisons budget in real terms in each year since 2010; and what the projected change will be in real terms in each year to 2022.
Budgets are subject to in year movement and organisational restructure. Prison unit costs are published annually, providing the actual cost mechanism for all prisons. These are not comparable across the long term due to changes in accounting treatments and scope of business which do not provide a consistent basis. Additionally, the public sector and private sector costs are not directly comparable because of differences in method of financing and scope of services.
Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (formerly known as the National Offender Management Service), routinely publishes average costs per prisoner, costs per prison place and overall prison unit costs for each private and public sector prison in England and Wales. This information is produced on an annual basis and is published after the end of each financial year.
Information on actual prison expenditure for previous financial years can be accessed in the Prison and Probation Performance Statistics pages for each financial year on the https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/prison-and-probation-trusts-performance-statistics#prison-performance-statistics. Prison unit costs can be found within the Excel document Costs per prison place and cost per prisoner by individual prison establishment in the ‘Cost by Establishment’ tab.
The most recent published figures for financial year 2016-17 can be accessed on the www.gov.uk website from the following link:
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/prison-performance-statistics-2016-to-2017
Within the costs per prison place and cost per prisoner 2016 to 2017 summary file, the figures for financial year 2015-16 have been restated to enable a more fair comparison between the two years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prison Budgets for future financial years have yet to reach a settlement and therefore have not yet been finalised.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many times and to which prisons has the National Offender Management Service’s National Tactical Response Group been deployed in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many times and to which prisons has the National Offender Management Service’s National Tactical Response Group been deployed in each of the last five years.
The National Tactical Response Group (NTRG) provides additional support staff or resources to prisons to help them deal with a variety of incidents. The overwhelming majority of call outs are for non-violent incidents, including where they attended as a precaution and when the situation was resolved locally. NTRG deployments are detailed in the attached appendix:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will publish the results of the Measuring the Quality of Prison Life survey from the last five years and the reports generated for each prison based on that survey.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will publish the results of the Measuring the Quality of Prison Life survey from the last five years and the reports generated for each prison based on that survey.
Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service carry out Measuring the Quality of Life surveys of individual prisons on a rolling programme.
On Thursday 26 October, the Ministry of Justice launched Justice Data, a new public facing platform for presenting published performance data. The website will be accessible at https://www.data.justice.gov.uk/prisons and includes a year of MQPL performance on Safety and Decency.
Until 2016/17 the scores for some dimensions of the prisoner surveys were included in the Prison Rating System (PRS) which was published annually. The results for 2016/17 can be found on gov.uk at https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/prison-annual-performance-ratings-2016-to-2017 and previous years will be available in the PRS reports at https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/prison-and-probation-trusts-performance-statistics
The PRS has been replaced with the Custodial Performance Tool and certain dimensions of the prisoner survey such as safety are part of this assessment. I have no plans to publish the reports of the Measuring the Quality of Life surveys as they are produced purely for management information.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, on how many occasions prisons have made transport arrangements for prisoner transfer that did not use the contracted transport provider in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, on how many occasions prisons have made transport arrangements for prisoner transfer that did not use the contracted transport provider in each of the last five years.
This information is not held centrally and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what quantity of each class of drugs has been detected by prison scanners in each prison in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what quantity of each class of drugs has been detected by prison scanners in each prison in each of the last five years.
The information requested is not centrally recorded.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, on how many occasions the Chief Inspector of Prisons has used the urgent notification protocol to alert him to a significant concern regarding a prison since 30 November 2017.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, on how many occasions the Chief Inspector of Prisons has used the urgent notification protocol to alert him to a significant concern regarding a prison since 30 November 2017.
The new Urgent Notification process allows Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Prisons to directly alert the Secretary of State if he has an urgent and significant concern about the performance of a prison. The Secretary of State will then publish his response and a plan of action within 28 days. Both the Chief Inspector’s letter and the Secretary of State’s response will be published.
Since its introduction on 30 November 2017, the Chief Inspector of Prisons has not triggered the Urgent Notification process.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 11 December 2017 to Question 117497, what the cost was of relocking prisons by the private contractor in 2016-17.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 11 December 2017 to Question 117497, what the cost was of relocking prisons by the private contractor in 2016-17.
The Ministry of Justice is not responsible for meeting such costs in privately managed prisons. As per my Answer to Question 117497, the costs of any re-locking in privately managed prisons in 2016/17 were met by the providers.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much has been paid in compensation to prison staff as a result of injuries suffered in a violent attack on the prison estate in each year since 2010.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much has been paid in compensation to prison staff as a result of injuries suffered in a violent attack on the prison estate in each year since 2010.
The information requested is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what criteria his Department uses when deciding where to base national tactical response group officers for individual prisons across England and Wales.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what criteria his Department uses when deciding where to base national tactical response group officers for individual prisons across England and Wales.
The National Tactical Response Group (NTRG) provide a specialist service to prisons through the deployment of staff resources with tactical and operational expertise required to bring about resolution to serious incidents of disorder. The service includes planning and preparation of tactical options to Gold, Silver and Bronze Commanders, and the implementation of those orders and this service is not solely limited to violent incident. NTRG are also the provider of training in Use of Force, developing the curriculum from which prison officers receive training in basic and advanced level control and restraint, personal protection techniques, and use of batons. They also complete cross government resilience assurance work and professional practice development around HMPPS operational response capabilities. The answers to all four NTRG related questions submitted follow below; |
Number of NTRG staff in post by year | |||
Year | Staff | Managers | Total |
2010 | 24 | 3 | 27 |
2011 | 24 | 3 | 27 |
2012 | 24 | 3 | 27 |
2013 | 24 | 3 | 27 |
2014 | 24 | 3 | 27 |
2015 | 35 | 3 | 38 |
2016 | 41 | 3 | 44 |
2017 | 41 | 3 | 44 |
|
NTRG ATTENDANCE AT REQUESTED SITES BY YEAR | ||||
Year | HMP Buckley Hall | HMP Forest Bank | HMP Hindley | HMP Manchester |
2010 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2011 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2012 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
2013 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
2014 | 2 | 2 | 33 | 5 |
2015 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 20 |
2016 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
2017 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 |
|
The budget allocation for National Tactical Response Group (NTRG) is shown below. These figures include pay and non-pay items (including training materials, operational incident consumables and vehicle costs). It is not possible to retrieve the 2010 data information within the time available.
NTRG Budget | |
2011-12 | 1.6m |
2012-13 | 1.6m |
2013-14 | 1.7m |
2014-15 | 1.8m |
2015-16 | 1.8m |
2016-17 | 1.9m |
2017-18 | 1.5m |
2018-19 | 1.5m |
2019-20 | 1.5m |
There has been no reduction in our investment in NTRG from 2017-18, in fact the position is quite the opposite. The funding position has changed due to the transfer of NTRG staff cost from the HR Directorate into the SOCT Directorate during 2017/18. The reason for the comparative budget reduction is that HR Directorate have held onto £0.2k budget for Facilities Management costs within the Learning & Development Unit and the average pay used to set the pay budget allocation for 17/18 was based on average costs which are £7k lower than in previous years and will need to be adjusted next year to reflect Operational rather than HQ posts of approx. £0.41m. HMPPS Budgets are set at the beginning of the year, but are subject to changes and adjustments during the course of the year due to changes in scope and priorities of the business. | |
|
NTRG staff work from one of two centres, and are deployed to establishments as the need arises. The deployment of NTRG staff to establishments is managed centrally and subject to operational considerations and priorities. The decision to deploy our specialist resources can be taken as a precautionary measure, however it is usually in response to an ongoing incident or disorder.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many prisoners in excess of Certified Normal Accommodation there have been in the prison estate in each of the last five years; and what estimate the Government has made of that number in each of the next five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many prisoners in excess of Certified Normal Accommodation there have been in the prison estate in each of the last five years; and what estimate the Government has made of that number in each of the next five years.
Information on how many prisoners in excess of Certified Normal Accommodation there have been in the prison estate in England and Wales in each of the last five years is set out in the following table. This information can also be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/prison-population-statistics We do not forecast CNA levels.
Month | In Use Certified Normal Accommodation | Population | Prisoners in excess of In Use Certified Normal Accommodation |
June 2012 | 79,450 | 86,352 | 6,902 |
June 2013 | 77,730 | 83,796 | 6,066 |
June 2014 | 76,017 | 85,582 | 9,565 |
June 2015 | 77,220 | 86,028 | 8,808 |
June 2016 | 76,819 | 85,130 | 8,311 |
June 2017 | 76,026 | 85,863 | 9,837 |
Note: CNA, or uncrowded capacity, is the HM Prison Service’s own measure of accommodation. CNA represents the good, decent standard of accommodation that the Service aspires to provide all prisoners.
We will always have enough prison places for those sent to us by the courts. Our reforms will close ageing and ineffective prisons and replace them with buildings fit for today’s demands. Our prison estate will have modern prison places that create the physical conditions for Governors to achieve better educational, training and rehabilitation outcomes.
Moved by
Lord Ashton of Hyde
43: Schedule 2, page 129, line 18, leave out “listed GDPR provisions” and insert “GDPR provisions listed in sub-paragraph (1A)”
44: Schedule 2, page 129, line 24, at end insert—
“(1A) The GDPR provisions referred to in sub-paragraph (1) are—
(a) the following provisions of the GDPR (the rights...
Moved by
Lord Ashton of Hyde
43: Schedule 2, page 129, line 18, leave out “listed GDPR provisions” and insert “GDPR provisions listed in sub-paragraph (1A)”
44: Schedule 2, page 129, line 24, at end insert—
“(1A) The GDPR provisions referred to in sub-paragraph (1) are—
(a) the following provisions of the GDPR (the rights...