Skip to main content

1-19 of 19 results for member:"Lord Triesman"

Department X
Ministry of Defence

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Ministry of Defence (19)
More

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Vaizey, and to welcome the noble Lords, Lord Roberts and Lord Young. I hope that they, like me, will welcome the degree of unity that we often find across this House. I used to have arguments with Lord...

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2023
Reference
834 cc543-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, could the Minister comment on what progress is being made to seize the assets and to deal with the financial movements of cash of those who have appeared on the sanctions list? Are we making progress and are we beginning to hurt their ability to operate?

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2023
Reference
826 c1991
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it was inevitable that this debate would focus on the barbaric Russian attack on Ukraine, on the unprovoked violence and war crimes now at the heart of Europe, and indeed on President Zelensky’s remarkable leadership. The Government have made a significant response, which I acknowledge, although I share...

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2022
Reference
822 cc482-3
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have plans for the posthumous award of the Military Cross to Second Lieutenant Walter Tull, killed on 25 March 1918 during the last German offensive of the First World War.

Asked by
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 November 2017
Reference
HL2832
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the contribution of non-white officers, including Second Lieutenant Walter Tull, to the regular Brisih army in the First world War.

Asked by
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 November 2017
Reference
HL2834
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the statement made on 9 July and the proposal in tonight’s Motion. I support the view that four submarines will make a key contribution to the alliance upon which our security architecture relies. The Minister has put the issues very effectively, though I share my noble...

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
774 cc310-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the summons that we each received to attend this Parliament, however traditional or quaint some of its language, contained some forbidding words about the weighty and perilous issues that we would be asked to consider. In our international relations, as the noble Earl, Lord Howe, said in his...

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 May 2015
Reference
762 cc46-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, aside from some issues concerning Europe, I believe that everyone approaches foreign policy matters in this House in

terms of the interests of the United Kingdom and our allies. Party advantage has been almost entirely irrelevant to our debates, and I want to follow that course today.

I want...

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 June 2014
Reference
754 cc374-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for what she has said and hope to respond against the background of the four guiding principles that she mentioned in her introduction. The debate has 56 listed speakers with extensive knowledge and experience, which, in my view, speaks volumes for the case for...

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 May 2013
Reference
745 cc409-413
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to take note of the White Paper The Future of the United Kingdom's Nuclear Deterrent (Cm 6994). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Drayson
Answering member
Lord Howell of Guildford
Department
Ministry of Defence; Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Debates
Date
24 January 2007
Reference
688 c1104-96
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to my noble friend Lord Drayson for his candid and eloquent presentation at the opening of the debate, and to the noble Lord, Lord Howell, for an outstandingly thoughtful response. I hope I do not embarrass him by saying that I am on the...

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2007
Reference
688 c1187-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the existence of any warhead would help to deter an enemy, but you have to have a credible system which is deployable at all times and capable of doing the whole job, not just a proportion of the job that sounds attractive on the day. In response to...

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2007
Reference
688 c1190-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not know about eternity but I take wholly the position that the noble Lord, Lord Hannay, raised in his question. Sine die is a more recent decision and is a reflection of the intention to have a stable system that recognises the reality of those who...

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2007
Reference
688 c1189-90
House
House of Lords

My Lords, absolutely. I hope that I have described the view that I take—that they are wrong. I mention the Garwin observations very quickly because they need to be dealt with. We do not believe that proper comparisons have been made. The comparison with the Ohio class is not useful....

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2007
Reference
688 c1194-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, today’s debate illustrates most vividly the extraordinary complexity and interdependence of the international challenges that we face. Foreign policy has always been central to our defence of our security, to the protection of our interests and the growth in our prosperity, and it is so today. There has...

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2006
Reference
687 c219-30
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on Queen's speech (third day) on foreign affairs, defence and international development.

Lead member
Lord Drayson
Answering member
Lord Howell of Guildford
Department
Department for International Development; Ministry of Defence; Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Queen's speech debates
Date
20 November 2006
Reference
687 c112-230
House
House of Lords

My Lords, God be with you. I enjoyed what I thought was a sort of a Maginot speech. The element where the octopus got attacked and then regrouped reminded me of 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea. I am not sure that I ended up grasping all the metaphors but I...

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2005
Reference
672 c225-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, perhaps I may respond with my profound thanks for the good wishes that both my noble friend Lord Drayson and I have received from noble Lords. I am sure that both of us will do our very best. Indeed, as I prepared for this debate over the...

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2005
Reference
672 c217-25
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on Queens speech (third day) on foreign affairs defence and international development.

Lead member
Lord Drayson
Answering member
Lord Triesman
Department
Department for International Development; Ministry of Defence; Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Queen's speech debates
Date
19 May 2005
Reference
672 c110-227
House
House of Lords