Skip to main content

1-8 of 8 results for subject:Cryptography

Member X
Lord Cameron of Lochbroom

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Cameron of Lochbroom, Lord (8)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Before the noble Baroness sits down, I am certainly aware that before the Bill came before this House—indeed, perhaps before it was put before another place—these provisions, so far as they affect Scotland, were placed before the Lord Advocate for his comments. I am well aware that at that stage...

Member
Lord Cameron of Lochbroom (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1149-50
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Baroness. A term for reflection is needed. Perhaps the noble Baroness will advise me whether the Lord Advocate, having had an opportunity to read Hansard, has changed his mind. On Question, amendment agreed to. [Amendment No. 118 not moved.]

Member
Lord Cameron of Lochbroom (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1150
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 117:"Page 22, line 7, after ““Scotland,”” insert ““the Lord Advocate or””" The noble and learned Lord said: This amendment is grouped with Amendments Nos. 118 and 125 in my name, and with the leave of the Committee I shall speak to all of them. They seek to...

Member
Lord Cameron of Lochbroom (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1145-8
House
House of Lords

In holding the scales, justice may be blind but there is no reason why prosecution should be. Speaking as a former Lord Advocate, I would have expected to be aware of all the material which led the police force to suggest that there should be a prosecution of an individual...

Member
Lord Cameron of Lochbroom (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1222
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 131:"Page 29, line 9, at end insert—" ““(d)   it shall operate without prejudice to any rule of law whereby— (i)   communications between a professional legal adviser and his client, or (ii)   communications made in connection with or in contemplation of legal proceedings, and for the purposes of those proceedings, are...

Member
Lord Cameron of Lochbroom (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1243
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to the Minister for her reply. I shall study it again. I had thought that she might say that in Schedule 8 it was very unlikely that there would be any material likely to be subject to legal privilege. However, that said, I beg leave to...

Member
Lord Cameron of Lochbroom (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1244-5
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Baroness sits down, she referred to the report from Sir Swinton Thomas about the law enforcement agencies. Obviously I do not know who they were or whether they included the prosecution. Is the noble Baroness suggesting that the reasons that particular material should be withheld from a...

Member
Lord Cameron of Lochbroom (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1230
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 125:"Page 23, line 33, leave out ““Court of Session”” and insert ““High Court of Justiciary””" The noble and learned Lord said: I have already spoken to the amendment. I beg to move. On Question, amendment agreed to. [Amendment No. 126 not moved.] Clause 23, as amended, agreed...

Member
Lord Cameron of Lochbroom (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1213
House
House of Lords