Skip to main content

1-20 of 156 results for house:"House of Lords"

Member X
Lord Judd
Session X
2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Judd, Lord (156)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What representations they have made, or are making, to the Government of Russia concerning alleged police violence against Yekaterina Sokiryanskaya at a recent memorial gathering for Anna Politkovskaya; and whether in those representations they emphasised, or are emphasising, that by invitation in September and OctoberMs Sokiryanskaya had attended a conference...

Asked by
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
7973; 686 c92WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have spent most of my professional life dealing with the frontline issues of the Third World and deprived parts of the global community, and it is good to see the Government, having listened to argument, move in response to it. The Government often get criticised for not...

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c466
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendment No. 18, which is in this group. Ideally, I should have liked to speak to this amendment separately but, in view of our procedural ruling, there may not be an opportunity to speak about the importance of Amendment No. 18 if Amendment No....

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2006
Reference
686 c177-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I warmly applaud this amendment. We greatly appreciate the consideration the Minister has given our concerns, and the meetings he has facilitated with those responsible within the department. We had good discussions together, and we very much appreciated that opportunity. It seems to me sad that a new...

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2006
Reference
686 c15-6
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does my noble friend accept that many of us are greatly cheered by the Government’s decision to keep the inspectorate independent, after the case so well argued by the noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham, and others? Does she not agree that the seriousness of the situation at Yarl’s Wood is underlined by the fact that when the chief inspector made a visit early last year she made 42 specific recommendations on what should be done? When the inspector returned early this year, virtually nothing had been done on the 42 recommendations. As I am sure my noble friend will agree, the inspector was particularly concerned with the plight of children—the number of children and the length of time they were there. She found it difficult to reconcile with our obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child as ratified by the United Kingdom in 1991. Are children in Yarl’s Wood regarded as children or not? If they are, why are the obligations under the convention not applied in spirit as well as letter at this institution? Does she not agree that it would be a good idea if periodically, perhaps every quarter, she was to publish a specific progress report on each of the 42 recommendations?
Asked by
Lord Judd (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
685 c1077-8
House
House of Lords
What progress they have made in implementing the recommendations of HM Chief Inspector of Prisons on action to be taken at Yarl’s Wood immigration removal centre, especially those relating to children.
Asked by
Lord Judd (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
685 c1077
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful again to the Minister for his considered and full reply to the points that we have just made. I am encouraged that he is prepared to think about it more. I am sorry that it took up so much of his Summer Recess, but...

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2006
Reference
685 c658-9
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 1: Page 1, line 5, after ““Duty”” insert ““to secure the right to education and”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendment No. 2 and strongly support Amendment No. 7, standing in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Walmsley. In one...

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2006
Reference
685 c651-3
House
House of Lords

I shall make an unusual intervention in that I find myself in sympathy with what has been said by the Conservative Front Bench. I cannot say how strongly I support the noble Baroness, Lady Walmsley, in her intention. Homophobic bullying is nasty, sinister, and cruel and can have terrible results....

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 July 2006
Reference
684 c1692-3
House
House of Lords

I support the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, and hope that the Minister will give very serious attention to his amendment. I, too, will be interested to hear his reply. We will come to relevant matters in the grouping that includes my own Amendment No. 24. However, I am...

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1604
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 24: Page 5, line 12, at beginning insert ““legal”” The noble Lord said: In moving Amendment No. 24, I will be particularly interested in the debate on Amendment No. 25, in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, which in some ways is related...

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1626-8
House
House of Lords

I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 25 to 27 not moved.] Clause 8 agreed to. Clause 9 [Absence without leave]:

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1638
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to all noble Lords who participated in this interesting debate. Given the observations made, the drafting of Clause 8 leaves something to be desired, and it would be helpful if my noble friend could agree to think about some of the things said and about how the...

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1637-8
House
House of Lords
My Lords, further to the right reverend Prelate’s question, is my noble friend aware that, when the Joint Committee on Human Rights was visiting Holloway, members, including myself, were deeply disturbed to hear from staff of occasions when it was discovered only during the process of receiving prisoners from court—sometimes late in the evening—that there were unattended children at home? Will she assure the House that all steps will be taken to make sure that such situations never arise in future?
Asked by
Lord Judd (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 July 2006
Reference
684 c1284
House
House of Lords
What action they are taking at the Council of Europe and elsewhere to ensure that all rulings of the European Court of Human Rights on human rights abuses in Chechnya are fully implemented by the Government of the Russian Federation.
Asked by
Lord Judd (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
19 July 2006
Reference
684 c1277
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I thank my noble friend for that reply. Does he agree that the intransigence of the Russian authorities and the refusal to take effective remedial action call into fundamental question the grave undertakings that Russia gave at the time of its admission to the Council of Europe about how it intended to become a full council member not only in letter but in spirit? Does he not also agree that that intransigence plays directly into the hands of extremists, because it undermines all those who might be won into a meaningful political process to overcome the continuing crisis in Chechnya by suggesting that everything else is ineffective and that the only thing to do if you really feel strongly is to go and join the militants?
Asked by
Lord Judd (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 July 2006
Reference
684 c1277-8
House
House of Lords

Lying behind Amendment No. 184 is the concern that we in the Joint Committee on Human Rights registered about this part of the Bill. The purpose of the amendment is to make all the relevant statutory protections for pupils at maintained schools available to pupils at academies and city technology...

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2006
Reference
684 c1157-9
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for his reply. I think that he is being very candid. However, the devil is often in the detail and he says that he has not had an opportunity to look in detail at the three examples that I gave. I hope therefore that his...

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2006
Reference
684 c1165-6
House
House of Lords

As someone who was concerned about these matters at Second Reading, I welcome greatly the moves that the Government have made. It is a very good illustration of how my noble friend listens to argument and responds to it. I express appreciation in that regard.

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c787
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 23: Page 3, leave out line 8. The noble Lord said: In moving Amendment No. 23, I shall speak also to Amendment No. 25. There is a great burden of business before the Committee today and therefore I shall endeavour to be as brief as possible. We...

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c723-4
House
House of Lords