Skip to main content

1-20 of 88 results for subject:Vetting

Member X
Baroness Neville-Jones

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Neville-Jones, Baroness (88)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what response they have made to the concerns of the National Society of the Prevention of Cruelty to Children that the proposed changes to child protection measures could put children at risk.

Asked by
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 March 2011
Reference
7805; 726 c226-7WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Neville-Jones on 24 January (WA 112), whether the 10 largest public sector employers follow the UK Border Agency recommendation that document checks to prove a right to work in the United Kingdom are conducted on all prospective employees,...

Asked by
Lord Laird (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 February 2011
Reference
6274; 724 c252WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government how much has been spent by (a) central government departments, (b) local government, and (c) quangos on Criminal Records Bureau checks in the last 12 months for which records are available.

Asked by
Lord Moonie (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 January 2011
Reference
5697; 724 c168WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Freud on 11 January (WA 433), whether employers need to establish the right of all potential employees to undertake employment by checking their immigration status and ascertaining whether they are subject to immigration control; and what provisions are...

Asked by
Lord Laird (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 January 2011
Reference
5960; 724 c112WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what criteria are applied by the police when deciding whether to approve leaders and helpers for youth groups.

Asked by
Lord Fearn (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 January 2011
Reference
5765; 724 c71-2WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the time limit of information held by the Criminal Records Bureau.

Asked by
Lord Moonie (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 January 2011
Reference
5696; 724 c63WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans they have to make changes to the Criminal Records Bureau checking procedures to encourage greater levels of volunteering.

Asked by
Lord Moonie (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 January 2011
Reference
5694; 724 c62-3WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what safeguards exist to ensure the accuracy and currency of data held by the Criminal Records Bureau; and what redress exists for individuals who consider such information to be incorrect.

Asked by
Lord Moonie (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 January 2011
Reference
5695; 724 c63WA
House
House of Lords

If you are going to do a review as extensive as the one proposed, it will have to have external input. It would not be particularly valid unless we were able to take advice on the kind of things on which I am offering to have consultation. I am told...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2010
Reference
721 c48GC
House
House of Lords

The advice that I am getting is that that would not be the case because a TV licence or similar document does not identify the individual but relates to them. That is right. You get back a receipt for the money that you have paid but it does not verify...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2010
Reference
721 c47GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not sure as to whether I am lost. Let me try to explain the differences. One of the difficulties that noble Lords are having relates to whether there is a difference between Clauses 4 and 6, to which my noble friend Lord Phillips referred. Clause 4(1)(a)...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2010
Reference
721 c46-7GC
House
House of Lords

I apologise. The noble Baroness is absolutely right: I failed to deal with the issue. I am concerned that the effect of Amendment 13 is to shift the burden of proof. The prosecution in these circumstances would have to prove a couple of elements. It would have to prove, first,...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2010
Reference
721 c48GC
House
House of Lords

It is not established that that is the case but I think that it is. We do not believe that the Act to which the noble Baroness refers covers driving licences. We would have to check this and provide a written answer. I suggest that we provide the noble Baroness...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2010
Reference
721 c49GC
House
House of Lords

It hangs on the improper intention.

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2010
Reference
721 c48GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, during the passage of the Bill in another place, the Government introduced an amended Clause 10, adding significant safeguards, and I think that it is entirely right to demand such safeguards. We specified in the Bill that data collected have to be destroyed within 28 days following the...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2010
Reference
721 c50GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness asks a perfectly reasonable question to which I shall try to get her an answer. I share her feeling that one must have accountability and that one must be certain that, at the end of the process of determining whether there is prosecutable evidence, information is destroyed....

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2010
Reference
721 c51GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, several questions have been raised. It is indeed the case that the contract with Experian was inserted in this Bill. We are transposing it, as it was negotiated by the previous Government. I do not think that it is contrary at all to the public interest, as it...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2010
Reference
721 c52GC
House
House of Lords

I do not have the impression that paragraph (i)—

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2010
Reference
721 c53GC
House
House of Lords

I take what the noble Lord says. We come back in all of this to the relationship between the Information Commissioner, the operation of these Acts and the assiduity with which the data protection provisions are applied. The Secretary of State is in discussion with the Information Commissioner about precisely...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2010
Reference
721 c52-3GC
House
House of Lords

I will endeavour to answer those two points. As regards the question posed by the noble Countess, Lady Mar, the distinction depends on the individual application and on the ability of the Identity and Passport Service to determine which source of information is best suited to the application. This is...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2010
Reference
721 c54GC
House
House of Lords