Skip to main content

1-20 of 211 results for house:"House of Lords"

Session X
1993-94
Subject X
Armed conflict

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Armed conflict (211)
More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

In what circumstances alleged attempts on the lives of prominent citizens may trigger action under the "self defence" provisions of the United Nations Charter against parties not convicted of the alleged offence in a court of law. - I refer the noble Lord to the Answer I gave him on...

Asked by
Lord Kennet (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 November 1994
Reference
558 c73WA
House
House of Lords

Whether existing United Nations Security Council resolutions may property be held to authorise pre-emptive attacks on Iraq. - Any decision relating to the use of force would depend on the circumstances at the time.

Asked by
Lord Kennet (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 November 1994
Reference
558 c63-4WA
House
House of Lords

Whether, in the light of the remarks by the United States National Security Adviser to the President that the United States armed forces' attack on Baghdad in retaliation to the alleged intended attack on the life of ex-President Bush carried a "lesson" for other governments, HMG will ensure that no...

Asked by
Lord Kennet (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 November 1994
Reference
558 c63WA
House
House of Lords

Whether HMG will list the instruments of international law which might have rendered "proper and legitimate" the missile attack by United States armed forces on Baghdad in 1993.

Asked by
Lord Kennet (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 November 1994
Reference
558 c64WA
House
House of Lords

What actions entitle a government to describe an event as "international terrorism" and to retaliate; and by whom these actions are determined to be "international terrorism".

Asked by
Lord Kennet (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 November 1994
Reference
558 c63WA
House
House of Lords

Whether the Prime Minister was correctly reported to have endorsed the attack on Baghdad by United States armed forces in 1993 in response to the alleged unsuccessful attack on ex-President Bush in Kuwait, opining that "state terrorism must be met with an unambiguous response and must be deterred by all...

Asked by
Lord Kennet (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 November 1994
Reference
558 c63WA
House
House of Lords

Whether it is an authorised practice to administer whooping cough vaccine together with anthrax vaccine, and the reason why this combination was administered to HM Forces taking part in Operation Granby. - Details relating to biological warfare protection measures employed by British Forces are classified.

Asked by
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 1994
Reference
558 c50WA
House
House of Lords

Why it was considered necessary to vaccinate HM Forces serving in Operation Granby against plague and not botulinum toxoid when the reverse decision was made by the United States Department of Defence for their personnel.

Asked by
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 1994
Reference
558 c51WA
House
House of Lords

How many patients have been examined by the Ministry of Defence appointed specialist for problems associated with Operation Granby, and whether these patients undergo tests to ascertain their immune status and whether there are any toxic residues in their blood or body tissues. - Inc figs.

Asked by
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 1994
Reference
558 c51WA
House
House of Lords

If the plague vaccine administered to members of HM Forces involved in Operation Granby was licenced for use in the UK, and if not, upon what info medical officers were able to base their advice in order to obtain the informed consent of their patients.

Asked by
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 October 1994
Reference
558 c39-40WA
House
House of Lords

In view of the pronouncement of Dr Graham Pearson of the Chemical and Biological Defence Establishment (557 c78-9WA, 26 July 1994) that, although NAIADs (Nerve Agent Immobilised Enzyme Alarm and Detector), "like all other chemical warfare agent detectors, can respond to substances other than chemical warfare agents, it is important...

Asked by
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Answering body
Chemical and Biological Defence Establishment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 October 1994
Reference
558 c38-9WA
House
House of Lords

What is their response to the statement of 13th September 1994 by General Delic, Commander of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina, giving evidence of continuing war supplies from Serbia to Serbs in Bosnia and of the presence in Bosnia of units of the Yugoslav Army.

Asked by
Lord Hylton (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 October 1994
Reference
558 c21WA
House
House of Lords

What is HMG information about the present status of General Mladic; and from whom does he receive pay and orders.

Asked by
Lord Hylton (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 October 1994
Reference
558 c21WA
House
House of Lords

Whether HMG will conduct medical examinations of those troops who served in the Gulf War to test for the possible effects of chemical weapons.

Asked by
Lord Molloy (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 October 1994
Reference
558 c4-5WA
House
House of Lords

SI 1994/2673 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 19 October 1994.

Department
Privy Council
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
18 October 1994
Reference
SI 1994/2673
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

SI 1994/2675 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 19 October 1994.

Department
Privy Council
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
18 October 1994
Reference
SI 1994/2675
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

SI 1994/2676 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 19 October 1994.

Department
Privy Council
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
18 October 1994
Reference
SI 1994/2676
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

SI 1994/2674 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 19 October 1994.

Department
Privy Council
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
18 October 1994
Reference
SI 1994/2674
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
1st supplementary on their command structure. - Includes figures.
Asked by
Lord Williams of Elvel (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
12 October 1994
Reference
557 c898-901
House
House of Lords
Lead member
Lord Williams of Elvel
Answering member
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey
Type
Private notice questions
Date
12 October 1994
Reference
557 c898-901
House
House of Lords