Skip to main content

1-20 of 305 results for subject:Injunctions

Subject X
Licensed premises

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Licensed premises (305)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
CHAP 20 2015; 2015 c. 20
Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Government bills
Date
5 June 2014
Reference
Bill 5 2014-15
House
House of Commons
Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Government bills
Date
23 January 2014
Reference
Bill 162 2013-14
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Theresa May
Department
Home Office
Type
White papers; Command papers
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
Cm. 8495
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c34
House
House of Commons

I very much agreed with the Minister's point about the importance of cutting alcohol-related violence. Could he tell the House what the Home Office is doing to ensure greater co-operation between accident and emergency departments and local police forces to give anonymised patient data allowing police forces to do hot-spot...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c82
House
House of Commons

Local authorities, licensing authorities and the police express an interest in using a full range of powers. The hon. Member for Hornchurch criticises the work that Home Office officials and the police do, day in day out, throughout the country in the areas worst affected by alcohol-related disorder, to decide...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c84-5
House
House of Commons

I have previously described this Bill as the Christmas tree Bill to top all Christmas tree Bills, with more bits dangled off it than legislative branches to hold it all together. Indeed, with a Ways and Means resolution and an instruction motion having been required from the House even during...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c116-9
House
House of Commons

We have had an interesting debate on this important subject. The framing of today's debate with the publication of the Select Committee's report has been helpful in highlighting some of the issues, which were raised by the Chairman. It is interesting to note that the Committee did not support the...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c67-8
House
House of Commons

Can my hon. Friend imagine what the citizens of Tynemouth might think if they were told that it was unsuitable for them to make a change regarding what happens in the early hours of the morning, when they thought it desirable, because the Minister had decided that they had to...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c87
House
House of Commons

There is a distinction to be drawn between, say, detections and convictions. That is an important distinction to make. Indeed, the National Policing Improvement Agency recognised that in a previous DNA database report:""It is important to note that the availability of DNA match intelligence may not have been causal in...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c40
House
House of Commons

There is little doubt about the scope and powerful effect of DNA evidence. In many respects, the use of DNA has revolutionised policing. The ability to match tiny traces of DNA left at the scene of a crime by an offender with the DNA that is taken from a suspect...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c39-40
House
House of Commons

I have been trying to follow the hon. Gentleman's logic. He is content for DNA to be taken for up to three years for serious offences, but not for up to six years, and I cannot quite understand the logic of the difference between the two, apart from the time...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c41
House
House of Commons

Well, we shall come to the judgment on timing. I was just about to turn to retention, which is central to the debate, and the balance to be struck in terms of the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. I appreciate that the Minister and the Government take the reverse...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c41-3
House
House of Commons

I am sure the hon. Gentleman would be the first to admit that the Government have moved since Second Reading. That is because of the pressure from all sides of the House. Does he accept that we are in this situation because the Government ought to have moved quickly on...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c40
House
House of Commons

That has been highlighted by what might be described as the postcode lottery, an issue on which I know the right hon. Gentleman has focused clearly. The fact that certain police forces are prepared, in exceptional circumstances, under guidance from the Association of Chief Police Officers, to remove the profiles...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c41
House
House of Commons

May I come to that point in a second? I gave way, but I shall just finish my point about the Home Affairs Committee. I suspect that there are few Members of this House, other than those who are taking part in this debate, who will know that the Home...

Member
Tony Baldry (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c59-60
House
House of Commons

It seems to me that it is crucial for the hon. Gentleman to recognise that on both sides of the House no one is against the national DNA database. The vast majority of crimes that are solved using the DNA database are those in which there is a match of...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c59
House
House of Commons

We are enjoined in both the Old and New Testaments to love justice, seek mercy and walk humbly with our God. An important part of the issue is justice and ensuring that justice is done. There is no doubt that DNA has enabled police forces across the country, through their...

Member
Tony Baldry (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c58-9
House
House of Commons

I just do not believe in written constitutions or in the charter of fundamental rights. I believe in the rights of the people, but they should not be entrenched and then adjudicated, in respect of sensitive political matters, by judges who, by definition, are not elected. I had a debate...

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c62
House
House of Commons