Skip to main content

1-20 of 152 results for subject:Walking

Subject X
Licensing

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Licensing (152)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they are giving (1) to licensing professional dog walkers, and (2) to limiting them to a number of dogs that can be walked at any one time.

Asked by
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
HL5028
House
House of Lords

New clause 74 (Community Right to Buy) debated and withdrawn. New clause 75 (Homes England Statutory Objects) debated and withdrawn. New clause 76 (Standards Board for England) debated and withdrawn. New clause 78 (Responsibility of executive councillors to answer questions) debated and withdrawn. New clause 79 (No role for councillors...

Lead member
Lee Rowley; Dehenna Davison
Answering member
Rachael Maskell; Alex Norris
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill Committee
Date
20 October 2022
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether the Government has any plans to introduce mandatory licensing for professional dog walkers.

Asked by
Daisy Cooper (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 April 2022
Reference
149389
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
12 February 2015
Reference
CHAP 7 2015; 2015 c. 7

Letter dated 22/01/2015 from John Hayes MP to all MPs regarding Government amendments tabled for the Report stage of the Infrastructure Bill on 26th Jan 2015. Incl. updated copy of Strategic highways company draft licence: Secretary of State for Transport statutory directions and guidance to Highways England. 34p.

Deposited by
Department for Transport
Type
Deposited papers
Date
22 January 2015
Reference
DEP2015-0096
House
House of Commons

I was simply wondering whether what I had read in the legislation was possible and would happen. But that is enough discussion on ferries for the moment. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment A272 withdrawn. Amendment A273 not moved.

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c931
House
House of Lords

Clause 233: Enforcement of MCZs in Scottish offshore region Amendments A254AN to A254AQ A254AN: Clause 233, page 142, line 5, at end insert— "( ) in any area within the United Kingdom or the UK inshore region, in relation to an offence which the person reasonably believes has been committed...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c869
House
House of Lords

I hope I can reassure the noble Lord. Clearly, there will need to be flexibility. I think that I have already said that the position of the coastal route will have to be tailored to local circumstances in consultation with local interests, such as access authorities. I mentioned four metres...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c889
House
House of Lords

Amendment A272 concerns ferries. Clause 286(7) states: ""For the purposes of the coastal access duty, a person is to be regarded as enabled to make a journey by ferry even if that journey can be made at certain times, or during certain periods, only"." That refers back to the part...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c928-9
House
House of Lords

Amendment A272 A272: Clause 286, page 174, line 12, leave out ", or during certain periods," and insert "of the day"

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c928
House
House of Lords

I support A361 in the name of my noble friend Lord Geddes. It was supported very well by my noble friend Lord Crickhowell, who spoke from his experience with ports which is how I will speak for a few moments today. I do not support the amendment tabled by the...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c907-8
House
House of Lords

I accept the noble Lord’s explanation and acknowledge that I may have been confused by his rhetoric. There should be balance between these factors. I agree with the wording that suggests that paragraph (a) is the most important and (b) and (c) are objectives which, while important, should not be...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c941
House
House of Lords

That would be very helpful. The Minister also spoke of a review within three years, which I read about in the proposals, and he explained that the route will be set up in different stages. Will the review come into being as soon as a certain number of the stages...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c890
House
House of Lords

As the Minister said, we are getting on to estuaries, but I would rather leave the detail and the probing questions I have until we reach them in the Bill. The purpose of this amendment is to find out what kind of gap in service is acceptable before a coastal...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c930
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate. Having been accused of some interesting ploys this evening On one occasion I sailed safely between the viewpoint of the Official Opposition and that of the Liberal Democrat Party and on another I accepted the argument of...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c949-51
House
House of Lords

We have four amendments in this group, to which I shall speak briefly in due course. I do not blame the noble Baroness, Lady Byford, for saying a few general words as we come to this first group of amendments on coastal access. Her amendments are appropriate and I congratulate...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c877-9
House
House of Lords

I shall move Amendment A267D and speak to the cluster of our amendments in the group addressing the same general interest. We have had an interesting debate about the difficulties of imposing a route all around the coast. It was made clear by my noble friend Lady Byford and others...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c891-2
House
House of Lords

I have two amendments in this group, which I will come to in a minute. I noticed that, in our discussion on the previous group of amendments, noble Lords declared interests. I do not think that we need to declare an interest at this stage because we are still in...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c892-4
House
House of Lords

As this is my first intervention on this Bill, I declare an interest as a farmer and landowner, and as a former chairman of the Countryside Agency, which I am sure most Members of the Committee will know has responsibilities under the CROW Act and for the management of existing...

Member
Lord Cameron of Dillington (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c894-5
House
House of Lords

I should like to extend what the noble Lord, Lord Cameron, has just said about Amendment A350A. I have a non-interest, in that I am not a member of the National Farmers’ Union, but I believe that it has a legitimate point in looking for clarity on this issue, just...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c895-6
House
House of Lords