Skip to main content

1-20 of 240 results for subject:Trident

Subject X
Military bases

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Military bases (240)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee reports (Government responses); Parliamentary committees
Committee
Scottish Affairs Committee
Date
8 January 2013
Reference
HC 861 2012-13
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Scottish Affairs Committee
Date
23 October 2012
Reference
HC 676 2012-13
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the Trident Alternatives Review being conducted by his Department will consider alternative basing locations for the nuclear deterrent fleet.

Asked by
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 April 2012
Reference
102637; 543 c78W
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Ministry of Defence
Type
Deposited papers
Date
26 April 2007
Reference
DEP 07/1076
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

I am very proud of the Labour Government. My constituency has record employment; we have seen the introduction of the minimum wage; there is justice for pensioners; there is record investment in our public services. I hope that Front-Bench Members recognise that when someone like me votes against the Government...

Member
Jim Devine (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c383-4
House
House of Commons

In an aside to Conservative Members a few moments ago, the hon. Member for Banff and Buchan (Mr. Salmond) asked what it would be like to have a facility like Faslane in the Thames valley. If he came and stood in my bedroom—[Interruption]—a remote possibility, I grant, and looked across...

Member
Lord Benyon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c384-5
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the opportunity to take part in this important debate. In the past three months, I have received hundreds of campaign postcards, letters and e-mails that are against the replacement of Trident. To date, I have not received a single letter in support of its replacement. That...

Member
Mohammad Sarwar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c388-9
House
House of Commons

I am delighted to have the opportunity to make a brief contribution to what has been an excellent debate. As it was for the hon. Member for Hackney, North and Stoke Newington (Ms Abbott), this was one of the most potent and divisive issues throughout my formative political years in...

Member
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c389-90
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c388
House
House of Commons

I will not give way; time is against us. China was also mentioned. The fact that it destroyed a satellite in space recently got hardly any coverage, but it shows how events are moving forward. We need to be aware of such events and react to them. Looking back in...

Member
Tobias Ellwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c388
House
House of Commons

Like many Labour Members, I came of age politically in the era when issues of war and peace, and our responsibility as a movement and as individuals to make the world a safer place for our children, were at the very forefront of the political debate. A lot has happened...

Member
Diane Abbott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c386-7
House
House of Commons

This debate has been prompted not by Trident, as the title of the debate would suggest, but because the submarines are reaching the end of their shelf life. The Trident D5 missile system could continue until 2042. The debate has provided a useful opportunity to take stock of where we...

Member
Tobias Ellwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c387
House
House of Commons

I support the retention of Britain’s nuclear deterrent. I also support the renewal of Britain’s nuclear deterrent. I am sorry that the amendment tabled by my right hon. Friend the Member for Southampton, Itchen (Mr. Denham), my hon. Friend the Member for Slough (Fiona Mactaggart) and me was not selected....

Member
Lord Whitehead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c385
House
House of Commons

I believe in the deterrence theory. It has worked for decades to protect our country. Although I believe that, I also want to seize every opportunity to negotiate those massive weapons away. To me, the crucial question in this debate is whether the White Paper adds to the non-proliferation talks....

Member
Willie Rennie (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c385-6
House
House of Commons

The question before the House is very simple. We are being asked whether we want the Government to proceed with the preparation of the continuation of our nuclear deterrent in some years’ time or not. Any amendment or rejection of the motion will mean that the House has instructed the...

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c382-3
House
House of Commons

Can the hon. Gentleman explain exactly which 50 per cent. he would cut?

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c376
House
House of Commons

Twelve months ago, when the Defence Committee started its first inquiry on Trident, I adopted a fairly sceptical approach. However, several issues have become clearer to me over those 12 months, principally the question of the timing of the decision. Believe me, if I thought that it was reasonable to...

Member
David S Borrow (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c379-80
House
House of Commons

It would be easy to convince ourselves in this debate that the world would be better off without nuclear weapons—we could all agree with that. We could also easily convince ourselves that we could do something more productive with £15 billion or £20 billion, but neither of those points are...

Member
Jeremy Wright (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c380-1
House
House of Commons

Had I been asked to deliver this speech 35 years ago when I was a young, idealistic student, I would have taken a different view and given a different speech. There are a number of reasons why I have changed my position. My support for the new programme is not...

Member
Alison Seabeck (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c381-2
House
House of Commons

Fifty per cent. of the current missiles would be cut. Such a significant reduction to Britain's nuclear arsenal would send a strong signal that Britain continues to meet its obligations under the non-proliferation treaty and is serious about cutting nuclear weapons. If Britain used all its influence to spearhead a...

Member
Alan Reid (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c376
House
House of Commons