Skip to main content

1-20 of 347 results for subject:Taxis

Subject X
Road traffic offences

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Road traffic offences (347)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will take steps to ensure that his Department's next periodic survey of seatbelt and mobile telephone use by motorists (a) covers London in its survey sample and (b) takes account of taxi and private hire vehicles and their use of...

Asked by
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 July 2017
Reference
1915
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport for what reason the owners of private hire vehicles are able to transfer liability for parking control notices (PCNs) to the driver at the time of offence but are not able to do so in respect of PCNs issued for bus lane...

Asked by
Mike Freer (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 March 2011
Reference
41565; 524 c920-1W
House
House of Commons

This note outlines the legislative requirements to fit and wear seat belts in cars, taxis and heavy goods vehicles (HGVs).

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
SN00043
Type
Public acts
Date
8 November 2006
Reference
CHAP 49 2006

Road Safety Bill (HL). Consideration of Commons amendments. Amendment 1 disagreed to on division (129 to 101). Amendments 2-4 agreed to. Amendment 5 disagreed to, and amendment proposed in lieu, on division (112 to 96). Amendment 6 disagreed to on division (104 to 89). Amendments 7-15 agreed to. Motion to...

Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on bills
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c320-64
House
House of Lords

: My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 7 to 10. Section 89 of the Road Traffic Act (tests of competence to drive) enables the Secretary of State to make regulations about tests of competence to drive. Section 89(3)(b)...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c349-50
House
House of Lords

My Lords, would the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, like to see a train driver banned from driving if he skidded his train for about 50 metres?

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative; Social Democratic Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c342
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I know of a case involving a particular train driver. One of his kids was ill. He was driving a train and he had forgotten to switch off his mobile phone. He got a call from the hospital. An inspector was with him in the cab. The driver...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c342-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support everything said by my noble friend Lord Berkeley and I shall not repeat it. I have also listened carefully to other noble Lords. One Monday evening at twenty to nine I had a father. At a quarter to nine I did not have a father because...

Member
Baroness Gibson of Market Rasen (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c343
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am slightly puzzled about how the decision is made on which charge will be brought against a driver. If, for example, as in cases that we read about all the time, a driver backing out of his garage tragically kills his own much-loved child who somehow has...

Member
Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c343
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is the Minister really saying that if the Government believe an injustice is likely to be done he does not have to give his mind to it? I can quite understand if he gives his mind to it and says, ““No, we believe this is right””, but to...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c345
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am dealing with the amendment before the House. It is not for me to enter into conjecture about what might be done at future stages. If noble Lords went into the Lobby on the basis that there is a broad intention to which they subscribe but aware...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c344-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister puts great weight on the decision reached by PACTS, which does an awful lot of good work. But how was the decision arrived at? Was it a decision reached by a vote of all the PACTS members? I attend meetings of the council, but I have...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative; Social Democratic Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c343
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as anticipated, this has been an interesting debate and it would be difficult for me to reply without undue length to every single point. On the question put by the noble Baroness, the circumstances she has identified would invite a series of other potential charges beyond careless driving....

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c343
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am extremely grateful to the Minister. If the House were persuaded by the arguments that a prison sentence was inappropriate for careless driving, is it within its procedural power on the ping pong to come back with a clause which would reflect that? I believe it is.

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c344
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is not for me to go into the decision-making processes of groups such as PACTS, but let me say that it enjoys a high reputation because its members support what it does and the Government take seriously representations from that source. I sought to disabuse noble Lords...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c344
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I looked this up to see what happened. I do not know whether the Minister saw what happened, but the Chairman at the time simply asked whether Amendments Nos. 5 to 8 were not moved, and someone replied, ““Not moved””. That was plainly not in accordance with the...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c336
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are coming back on the substantive issues, but we are where we are. I described to the House the effect of the amendment that was passed and the change to the Bill that the other place then considered. The noble and learned Lord disagreed with the Government...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c336-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move, That the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 6. The House will recall that we discussed this issue at considerable length when we first considered the Bill. An amendment was made to Clause 20 to the effect that, where the...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c336
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have listened carefully to some of the speakers on the Opposition Benches. I take from this that the definition of ““careless”” is that it is just a momentary lapse; that it does not really matter; that we are all careless at some stages in our lives; and...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 November 2006
Reference
686 c342
House
House of Lords