Skip to main content

1-20 of 503 results for subject:Ports

Subject X
Elizabeth line

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Elizabeth line (503)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Amendment 58 would potentially allow the levying authority to determine when to stop collecting and enforcing a BRS for a project it had abandoned. The reason we do not think the amendment is appropriate is not because we do not think levying authorities would behave honourably but because it assumes...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c563-4GC
House
House of Lords

Clause 27: Special introductory provision Amendment 62 62: Clause 27, page 17, line 4, at end insert— "(1A) The requirements under section 7(1) or 10(7) to hold a ballot do not apply in relation to a BRS imposed by the Greater London Authority for the purpose of raising money for...

Member
Baroness Valentine (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c567GC
House
House of Lords

As Amendment 55B is consequential, I shall focus on Amendment 60A, which is grouped with it, and apologise for its length and complexity. This amendment provides the ability to broaden the way that business improvement districts are funded by giving BIDs the power to decide whether or not to include...

Member
Baroness Valentine (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c556-7GC
House
House of Lords

I will try to pick up some of those points. On the information to collect the money from owners, I believe that Julie Grail of the business improvement districts organisation—I cannot remember the name—said that it is possible to get the information to collect using local estate agents. There is...

Member
Baroness Valentine (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c560GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to everyone who has spoken in the debate, particularly to the noble Baroness for moving the amendment. As the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, made clear, it raises complex issues. He took us through some of the most recent and longer-term history and put forward some challenges, which...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c560GC
House
House of Lords

I may have more than enough time but in terms of the Long Title, it is not so much for the Government but for the House itself. If the noble Lord will leave that challenge with me, I will certainly think about the scope and the issues that it would...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c560-1GC
House
House of Lords

It will extend only to BIDs where a BRS is in place.

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c562GC
House
House of Lords

I shall speak also to Amendments 61A and 61C. Amendment 58 relates to the abandonment of a project and to collection and enforcement in that situation. I seek to take out the provision that the Secretary of State may prescribe the date when the BRS is treated as having come...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c562-3GC
House
House of Lords

Of course, I tabled these amendments before the consultation document was published. This may not be a good, liberal attitude but, on an issue that would not be subject to consultation, the billing authority should not be stuck with costs that are essentially imposed upon it by the decisions of...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c566GC
House
House of Lords

I hope that I can satisfy the noble Baroness on this point. Amendment 59 would enable billing authorities to be able to recover the costs that they incur in preparing for the collection and recovery of BRS. Amendment 60 would remove the power for the Secretary of State to set...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c565-6GC
House
House of Lords

I wonder whether it would help the debate if I confirmed to the noble Lord that one of my amendments relates to the requirement to place an electronic copy on the website. I am seeking a summary of the document to go on the website as well as the full...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c511GC
House
House of Lords

I will speak also to Amendments 20, 21 and 22. These amendments are about the prospectus that has to be issued as part of the consultative process. In part they come from the Federation of Small Businesses. The prospectus may be a complex document; I think it will have to...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c509-10GC
House
House of Lords

I rise to support the noble Baroness in her Amendment 48B but also to speak to amendments standing in my name and that of the noble Earl, Lord Cathcart. They are probing amendments which give us an opportunity to put some real concerns on record. The amendments deal with the...

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c544-5GC
House
House of Lords

I am still a little puzzled. I understand that the reliefs are captured by the formulae in Clause 13, but then why is Clause 15(1) necessary? It says that a levying authority may apply such reliefs as it thinks appropriate. Does that mean that it could apply greater reliefs than...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c547GC
House
House of Lords

The Minister makes a good point, but she accepts that we were arguing that London and Crossrail should be exempt. We were not proposing that London should be—

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c553GC
House
House of Lords

I have Amendments 52 and 55 in this group. Amendment 52 would amend Clause 16, which relates to the interaction with the BID levy. Clause 16(1) provides for setting rules for the interaction. My amendment would require consultation with those liable for it and the billing authority—which may be different...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c552GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may deal with the offset first and Amendments 51, 53 and 54. Linked to that is Amendment 55A, which relates to Crossrail. Amendment 52 has a different focus. It would leave the decision whether to have an offset to the levying authority, but proposes, as the noble Baroness...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c552-3GC
House
House of Lords

I am very glad that the noble Earl had the opportunity to correct Hansard. I cannot imagine what his postbag from Swaffham and other parts of rural Norfolk has been like.

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c523GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister, but I understood the intervention of the noble Lord, Lord Tope, to be different to that. I thought that he was arguing that rather than adding greater uncertainty, the introduction of the amendment would reduce uncertainty. At the moment there is a double level...

Member
Lord Moynihan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c524-5GC
House
House of Lords

We are quite comfortable with the amendments. The only concern that we have about them is the extent to which they add to the bureaucratic and time delays that may be involved. Again, this links back to a debate that we had on an earlier amendment; that the greater use...

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2009
Reference
710 c522GC
House
House of Lords