Skip to main content

101-200 of 722 results for subject:"Local development frameworks"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I thank noble Lords who have supported this amendment and the Minister for responding in the positive way that he has. This is broader than social housing and, although I am really pleased to hear that everybody agrees that local authorities must know the facts in order to meet the...

Member
Baroness Greengross (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c683
House
House of Lords

148ZZA: Clause 96, page 74, line 15, leave out subsection (2) and insert— ““(2) For subsection (3) (requirements as to preparation of schemes) substitute— ““(3) The local planning authority must have regard to sustainable development and Town Centre First Policy, as defined in accordance with subsection (3A). (3A) The Secretary...

Member
Lord Cotter (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c683
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Baroness answers, can I thank the Minister for alerting us to the regulations which have been posted in the Library? It is very difficult to keep abreast of what is going on in this Bill. We had some government amendments tabled yesterday of which we had no...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c682
House
House of Lords

One of the things the Bill provides for, as we have just discussed in Clause 95, is the duty to co-operate. It is not a light thing; it is a duty. I mentioned in the précis I gave in response to the noble Lord that there are sanctions against authorities...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c682-3
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I might respond because otherwise we will prolong a discussion about something that is not particularly apposite to this group of amendments. I believe that all sides of the Committee have faith in liberal market economies, and one of the effects of liberal market economies is that consumers tend...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c692
House
House of Lords

I shall certainly not move my amendment when I come to it, but I want to make a slightly different point. My amendment does not in any way suggest that there should not be supermarkets of any size. It suggests that in any particular place there should be an appropriate...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c692-3
House
House of Lords

I think that I can help the noble Lord. Large centres of population have clearly identifiable city or town centres, but the outer suburbs usually have shopping malls and streets that are very important as neighbourhood shopping areas. We really want to be able to strengthen all these traditional shopping...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c690-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I just wonder about the definition of town centres. In an area like Newcastle, the town centre is obvious, but in an area like Doncaster or Kirklees, where a number of towns are brought together under one unitary authority, what would be the definition of a town centre?...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c690
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the Minister responds to my noble friend, perhaps I may say that I am certainly a great advocate of variety and choice. However, it worries me that it is actually the shoppers themselves who do not support independent shops. That is why those shops have been squeezed...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c691-2
House
House of Lords

Before my noble friend sits down, may I say that I was disappointed by his absolutely granite remarks about supermarkets? There are serious issues around what is a vital, viable, sustainable and diverse high street. Many factors are involved, both economic and social, and I do not think that Parliament...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c691
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if my noble friend wants to come to our high street, he can have 30 minutes of free parking. The Mill Road story, to which my noble friend referred, is extremely interesting. Unfortunately, the Tesco Express, which was its original focus, was successful. There are defects with all...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c687-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with the sentiments of what everyone has been said so far. We must revitalise town centres. We have all learnt from the mistakes of out-of-town shopping, with its free car parking. In Fakenham, in Norfolk, when a new shopping centre opened about 15 or 20 years...

Member
Earl Cathcart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c687
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for participating in this useful debate on this group of amendments, which has been informed by my noble friend Lord Cotter’s Retail Development Bill and his experience in this area. I am very grateful to him for moving his amendment. As noble Lords,...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c689-90
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I warmly endorse the thrust of the three amendments. It is clearly desirable to have a proper planning framework to encourage retail diversity. However, although that is necessary, it is not a sufficient condition of ensuring that we get retail diversity. There are other significant considerations, particularly financial...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c688-9
House
House of Lords

148ZZZZBB: Clause 97, Page 75, line 32, leave out from ““modifications”” to end of line 33

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c697
House
House of Lords

May I remind noble Lords that I have responded on behalf of the Government to these amendments and I believe that the noble Lord is reiterating arguments which have been very well laid before the Committee already. We want to get through quite a lot of business and I hope...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c693
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord and, if I understand him correctly, he is saying the amendments are unnecessary because such provisions are already included. I suppose I had hoped that the temptation of joined-up government would have been irresistible and he would have wanted to accept these amendments...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c697
House
House of Lords

I share the concern of those wishing to be ambitious in meeting the challenges of climate change. I also agree that planning has a big part to play. We have underlined this in the carbon plan, our response to the Environmental Audit Committee’s report on adaptation and—as the noble Baroness,...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c696-7
House
House of Lords

This is the first time that I have spoken in this stage of the Bill so I declare an interest as a solicitor in private practice, mostly in Scotland but also to some extent in England. I want to make two quick points. First, the Climate Change Act establishes legally...

Member
Lord Boyd of Duncansby (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c696
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support these amendments. In some ways they are no-brainers: it is so obvious that they need to be there to close the gap that my noble friend mentioned. Proposed new subsection (1A)(b) in subsection (2) of the amendment covers flooding risk, which gets greater all the time....

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c695-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendment 150ZA. The amendments were inspired by existing legislation to which the Government have already signed up, mainly the Climate Change Act 2008. The Government have agreed to and supported an overall target of a 60 per cent cut in CO2 on 1990...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c694-5
House
House of Lords

148ZZB: After Clause 96, insert the following new Clause— ““Development plan documents: climate change and carbon budgets (1) Section 19 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 is amended as follows. (2) For subsection (1A) substitute— ““(1A) Development plan documents must include policies designed to secure that the development...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c694
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his responses. I deliberately said, in proposing my amendment, that I did not want to go on too long, because it is a very big issue and we know what pressure we are under on the Bill, so I will try to resist going on...

Member
Lord Cotter (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c693-4
House
House of Lords

I shall say one more thing. I apologise if I am going on too long. I invite the noble Lord, who is into flowers, to come to Colne and look at all the flowers in Colne now, done by the wonderful organisation Colne in Bloom as part of the Britain...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c693
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend for introducing these amendments. I understand his purpose, but we are not minded to accept them. We are concerned particularly about the first two amendments, Amendments 148ZZZZBB and 148ZZZZBC, because they would reintroduce regulatory bureaucracy by restricting councils from making small text edits,...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c698-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the numbering is getting bizarre but the content of the amendments makes up for it. I will also speak to the other amendments in this group. We are now on to the fairly short section of the Bill that deals with local development schemes and Clause 97 about...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c698
House
House of Lords

148ZZZZBH: Clause 97, Page 76, line 13, at end insert— ““( ) In section 23 (adoption of local development documents) after subsection (3) insert— ““(4) Subject to subsection (5), if a development plan document has not been adopted by the date that this subsection is brought into force, it cannot...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c699
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am prepared to withdraw my amendment. I did not think I would get anywhere, but it is still very disappointing. The Minister said that the Government trust local councils to produce plans that will produce sustainable development, and so on. The truth of the matter is that...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c699
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am conscious of the need to make haste and I am perhaps making too much. There are a lot of ““nots”” in this amendment. Obviously where local development frameworks are in place, local authorities are consistently working on development plan documents. In any clarification that may be...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c700
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a probing amendment, prompted by the National Housing Federation. It specifically focuses on an authority that has not adopted its local plan document and provides that this cannot constitute a reason for refusing planning permission. In a sense, this picks up just part of the federation’s...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c700
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister. I will certainly withdraw the amendment, but I am still a little unclear about the situation in which the local planning authority has not yet gone through the processes and got its local development plan in place. What will determine the acceptability of planning...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c701
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, is quite right in moving this probing amendment to emphasise that the preparation of plans is a great challenge for local authorities. It is central to the Localism Bill and is certainly very important for them. We believe in a timely plan-led system,...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c700-1
House
House of Lords

Could the Minister clarify that? Is there not going to be a sort of bonanza before the LDP is finally approved? Before that, all the applicants will have to do is comply with the NPPF, which must be a very high-level document. Will there not be a flood of planning...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c702
House
House of Lords

I think I gave the noble Lord the answer to this when I said that the presumption would be that the planning should be in accordance with the NPPF and any other material considerations. Outside that, the presumption must be that approval is given, so there is an incentive for...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c701-2
House
House of Lords

148ZZZBB: Clause 99, Page 76, line 40, at end insert— ““( ) In section 205 (the levy), at the end of subsection (2) insert ““without prejudicing the provision of affordable housing in accordance with the development plan””.””

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c702
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister again. I think that my noble friend Lord Berkeley has articulated the issue more effectively than I did. I would like to read the record on this. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 148ZZZZBH withdrawn. Clauses...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c702
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is an incentive for local authorities to get these plans in place—I think I have made that point throughout our discussions on these amendments—and all other material considerations have to be met, so it does not happen totally in the void. Local authorities must have regard to...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c702
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I, too, may ask a question about the provision of infrastructure on an ““ongoing”” basis. I entirely sympathise with the search for elegance, as my noble friend put it. My question is whether providing infrastructure on an ongoing basis means maintaining it. If that was what was...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c706
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish to speak to my Amendment 148ZZCBA. It proposes to remove subsection (3)(b) of Clause 100, not, as my noble friend might think, in protest at the word ““ongoing””, although it is an entirely unnecessary word. Perhaps the clause should refer only to future costs. What costs...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c705-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have some amendments in this group, which I shall try to rattle through as quickly as possible. I start by saying that we support the broad thrust of what the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, has just said. Amendment 148ZZBBB is a kite-flying amendment that would include building...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c704-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 148ZZZBB, I will also speak to the other amendments in my name, namely 148ZZZBC, 148ZZZBD and 148ZZBAA. I will comment on the other amendments in this group after they have been spoken to. Amendments 148ZZZBB, 148ZZZBC and 148ZZZBD deal with the community infrastructure levy and...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c702-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps it would be helpful if I first answered the question from my noble friend Lady Hamwee on whether ongoing means maintaining the infrastructure or excludes it. Clause 100 sets out that this includes maintenance and operation of infrastructure. Amendment 148ZZBBC seeks to allow the levy to fund...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c708-9
House
House of Lords

Can the noble Earl clarify what is covered by ““future ongoing costs””? Is it maintenance of housing or maintenance of a road? It is a bit of an open-ended commitment. You can understand a capital cost but if it is maintenance for roads or housing forevermore, it seems a bit...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c708
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the purpose of the CIL is for owners or developers of land to contribute to the cost of providing infrastructure that supports the development of the area. Almost all development has some impact on the need for infrastructure, or benefits from it. It is fair that such development...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c706-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I give qualified support to Amendment 148 in the name of my noble friend Lady Greengross and to Amendments 148ZZZA and 148ZZZBA tabled by the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie. My support is qualified because the words, "““the local planning authority must””," are not popular in local government circles....

Member
Lord Best (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c678
House
House of Lords

My Lords, forgive me if I am wrong, but I thought that all councils were already required to make a housing needs assessment under the existing PPS3. If that is the case, I am not sure what the amendments will add other than to make councils do their job better.

Member
Earl Cathcart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c678
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the principles of the amendment proposed by the noble Baroness, Lady Greengross. A whole section of this Bill later on in Part 6 deals with social housing and changes many of the existing arrangements for tenure, what the local authority is obliged to provide and tenants’...

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c679-80
House
House of Lords

I hesitate to express a slightly different point of view as a vice-president of the Local Government Association from our esteemed president, but I am not quite as reluctant as he is to see this kind of duty, as proposed by the noble Baroness, Lady Greengross, and my noble friend...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c678-9
House
House of Lords

I will certainly do that.

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c652
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for the great care that he has taken in responding to these amendments. We might get on a bit quicker on one or two of them if the people providing him with his briefings understood that, often in Committee in this House, we put...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c652-3
House
House of Lords

147Q: Clause 95, page 73, line 38, leave out ““(1)(b)”” and insert ““(1)(c)”” Amendment 147Q agreed. Amendment 147R not moved. Clause 95, as amended, agreed. House resumed. Moved by

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c653
House
House of Lords

148: After Clause 95, insert the following new Clause— ““Local development: survey of area (1) Section 13 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (survey of area) is amended as follows. (2) After subsection (3) insert— ““(3A) The local planning authority shall undertake and publish a numerical assessment of...

Member
Baroness Greengross (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c675
House
House of Lords

My Lords, localism and the Localism Bill present many opportunities for people of all backgrounds and all ages to be involved in local decision-making and developing their neighbourhoods. I declare an interest as heading up a think tank, ILC-UK, which looks at the impact of demographic change on all our...

Member
Baroness Greengross (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c675-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have Amendments 148ZZA and 148ZZZBA in this group, but they are consistent with the amendment moved by the noble Baroness, Lady Greengross, which we support. They have been proposed to us jointly by Shelter, the TCPA and the National Housing Federation. These amendments would help to ensure...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c676-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think the noble Lord will have to read the Hansard, but what I said was quite clear and the words in my speech will make that clear. The short answer is yes.

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c710
House
House of Lords

In which case, I am most grateful to the noble Earl. Amendment 148ZZZBB withdrawn. Amendments 148ZZZBC to 148ZZBAA not moved. Clause 99 agreed.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c710
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I would certainly like to take up my noble friend’s offer of conversations between now and Report. I think I heard three different answers to the question posed by my amendment, and I hope that I will end up with one answer by the time we get there.

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c710
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank the Minister for a full and indeed very positive, or broadly positive, reply. Certainly at this hour, I should like to read the record and perhaps revert to those who pressed this particular amendment on us to talk it through with them in detail. I...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c710
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the fairly positive response to some of the amendments I moved. I look forward to further discussions, and I hope that the Government will have completed their reflection by the time we get to Report. The specific question I want to ask is on...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c710
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is quite a detailed point. It would probably be safer if I wrote to the noble Lord on that.

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c710
House
House of Lords

Localism Bill. Lords committee stage seventh day. Clause 95 agreed to as amended. Clauses 96 to 99 agreed to.

Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c632-53, c675-710
House
House of Lords

136A: Clause 76, page 62, line 38, at end insert— ““( ) by a community organisation operating in the local authority area,””

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c393
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords for what I thought was a very good debate. I want to make it clear that, unlike the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, I do not want this part of the Bill to disappear; I want it to work. I want it to save pubs,...

Member
Lord Cameron of Dillington (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c381
House
House of Lords

The problem is that you have a district council within a county area, so the resident and land may be in one place geographically but there are two authorities within whose boundaries it is situated. That is the problem that I foresee.

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c398
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendment 136B. There has been much concern that individuals will be allowed to make nominations. The argument is that if an asset is of community value, the nominations should be made by that community group, which has local connections, and not by an individual....

Member
Earl Cathcart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c393
House
House of Lords

My Lords, given the comprehensive debate we had before the break, I intend to speak for about 30 seconds. This group of amendments is all about who should be represented on the lists to inform either consent or denial. My amendment addresses itself to the fact that it should be...

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c393
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I almost feel the need to apologise for not being a refugee from the dark satanic mills of Bradford, unlike so many other noble Lords who have spoken in this debate.

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c396
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for coming in and out of the debate on Tuesday and missing the key parts of the discussion. I will speak to Amendment 136A. My day on Tuesday was punctuated by meetings about the Olympics and a meeting with a Minister. However, by 11 pm on...

Member
Lord Mawson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c393-6
House
House of Lords

That is presumably why there are refugees in your Lordships' House. My amendments are designed slightly to strengthen and clarify the position in respect of those who should be included in the list. The first relates to Clause 76(2)(b)(iii), which speaks of ““a person specified””. I simply suggest that we...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c396-7
House
House of Lords

All Bradford’s problems stem from the fact that the mills all closed down quite a long time ago.

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c396
House
House of Lords

There is a consistent message here about making sure that local community groups take advantage of the opportunities that the Government have put forward, the emphasis being on ““local””. I shall not go into this in great detail, because my noble friend Lady Thornton and my noble Bradfordian friend Lord...

Member
Lord Patel of Bradford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c397
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c397
House
House of Lords

I apologise for getting up too early. I had not realised the Front Bench was boxing and coxing and acting as supports as well as leads. We can sort out who is doing what when. These are interesting amendments. I was very taken by the intervention of the noble Lord,...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c398
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my Amendment 139A states: "““In considering whether to accept a community nomination, a local authority must be satisfied that the person or body making the nomination has demonstrated that it has the intention and capacity to be treated as a potential bidder should a relevant disposal be entered...

Member
Lord Cotter (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c397
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I endorse what the noble Lord has just said. We increasingly have concerns about the timing of the process. We are doing everything we can to make sure that we make progress, but there is an issue with trying to resolve some of these matters when the House...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c380
House
House of Lords

147FG: Clause 94, page 71, line 40, at end insert— ““(3A) Subsection (3) shall not apply to those policies in an approved regional strategy that have been specifically referred to as part of the policy content of a Local Development Framework submitted under section 20(1) of the Planning and Compulsory...

Member
Lord Best (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c457-8
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what authority local authorities have to develop their own local development frameworks; by what mechanism he proposes that disputes between local authorities are to be decided; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Laurence Robertson (Conservative)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
64012; 530 c1367W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether local authorities are required to work with neighbouring authorities in developing joint core strategies; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Laurence Robertson (Conservative)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
64013; 530 c1367W
House
House of Commons

I will be very brief. The noble Lord, Lord True, has touched upon some of the key issues and the noble Lord, Lord Howard, raises some important points. As this is a localism Bill, it should be left to local authorities in local areas to determine this, but we have...

Member
Lord Patel of Bradford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c404
House
House of Lords

I declare my interest as both chair of the Rural Coalition and chair of the National Housing Federation. I do not think the latter is particularly relevant, but it might be. Having listened to the Minister’s response, I have a niggling concern that the Government are creating a vastly overcomplicated...

Member
Lord Taylor of Goss Moor (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c399-400
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should like to add a few comments to those made by the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, in moving his amendment. All those who have spoken are very conscious of the fact that planning in the future must surely be a balance between social, economic and environmental needs....

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c438-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, absolutely not. I was going to go on to say that there are many examples where owners take a benevolent view towards the community. It has already been highlighted that they might take a much more cautious attitude in future. No, I am thinking of downstream of the...

Member
Earl of Lytton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c376
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Lord accept that these provisions are not primarily directed at post offices and pubs? They cover wasteland in cities, disused bank buildings, disused offices, railway arches, warehouses, mills and allotments. Might not the noble Lord be undermining his own case if he is trying to tell the...

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c362
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for those answers. The question in the back of my mind is the extra staffing resources that local authorities will need in order to compile and maintain these lists of community assets. I suppose the answer is that we do not know because we do...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c358
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we will have to see what happens as regards the draft regulations. I cannot say that I am persuaded by the argument that the district valuer is not the appropriate person to deal with these matters. However, we shall see precisely what the Government have in place when...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c427
House
House of Lords

147E: Clause 85, page 68, line 9, at end insert— ““(vii) appeals against decisions made under the regulations.”” Amendment 147E agreed. Amendment 147EA not moved. Clause 85, as amended, agreed. Clauses 86 and 87 agreed. Amendment 147F Moved by

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c427
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise, the noble Lord did correct himself. However, we still believe that we have a better route than the noble Lord. We do not think that the district valuer would have a role in this. As I say, we think that that provision would be unnecessary in...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c427
House
House of Lords

I had intended to say that depends entirely on the district valuer.

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c426
House
House of Lords

Would the noble Lord concede that in children’s or adult services there might be a need and a demand for buildings or other facilities to be made available whereby the actual funding and support would probably come from the county council, rather than the district, and that there would be...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c428
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment reverts to the issue that I raised previously about districts within counties and who is to be the appropriate authority. It suggests a framework whereby there may be a shared interest that might be disposed of between the two tiers within county areas. I am not...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c428
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have tabled Amendments 147FA and 147FB in this group. I do not wish to pursue the technicalities of what they say but they are a means of probing the role of national park authorities in all this—whether the proposed system would be any different in national parks,...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c428
House
House of Lords

147F: After Clause 87, insert the following new Clause— ““Co-operation If different parts of any land are in different local authority areas, the local authorities concerned must co-operate with each other in carrying out functions under this Chapter in relation to the land or any part of it.”” Amendment 147F...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c427
House
House of Lords

147FZA: Clause 91, page 70, leave out lines 14 to 22 and insert— ““(a) a London borough, (b) a metropolitan district, (c) a unitary council, (d) a county council, or (e) by agreement between a county council and one or more of its constituent district councils, a district council.””

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c427
House
House of Lords

147B: Clause 83, page 67, line 7, leave out ““, assignment or surrender”” and insert ““or assignment”” 147C: Clause 83, page 67, line 8, leave out ““, assignment or surrender”” and insert ““or assignment”” Amendments 147B and 147C agreed. Clause 83, as amended, agreed. Clause 84 agreed. Amendment 147D Moved...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c422
House
House of Lords

147D: After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— ““Informing owner of request to be treated as bidder (1) Subsection (2) applies if— (a) after a local authority has received notice under section 82(2) in respect of land included in the authority’s list of assets of community value, and (b)...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c422-3
House
House of Lords

147DA: After Clause 84, insert the following new Clause— ““Local authority additional powers for assets of community value (1) A local authority may acquire and make fit for community use any land that is included in the authority’s list of assets of community value. (2) An acquisition under subsection (1)...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c423
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have tabled the amendment in order to discuss the role of local authorities and other public bodies—but particularly the role of local authorities—in assisting with community purchases as a result of this legislation. The amendment states that the local authority may acquire and make fit for community...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c423-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, for raising this matter. I referred to it in earlier remarks and I will not repeat what I said, but it would be extremely helpful for the Committee to see this, given the far-reaching potential range of the regulations—who...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c426
House
House of Lords

When I made my introduction to the Government’s position on this, I hope that I made it quite clear that we go back to May of last year for indications of what the Government would require of local authorities in this respect. I cannot believe that local authorities have been...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c463
House
House of Lords

My Lords, requiring local authorities to go through this process is completely inimical to the idea of localism. As I understand it, the Government’s policy is to reduce burdens on local authorities, but I do not know whether the problem that is being addressed is a political problem—we understand why...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2011
Reference
729 c462-3
House
House of Lords