Skip to main content

101-200 of 2,443 results for subject:Subscriptions

Type

+ Legislation (7) + Bills (1) + Public bills (1) + Private members' bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (6)
-
Statutory instruments (6)
+ Members' contributions (2,069)
-
Business questions (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (22)
-
Oral question time interventions (1)
-
Oral questions (21)
-
Proceeding contributions (2,025)
+ Parliamentary committees (23) + Committee proceedings (20)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (7)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (5)
-
Select Committee reports (1)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
-
Select Committee written evidence (4)
+ Parliamentary papers (23)
-
Command papers (1)
-
Consultation papers (2)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (1)
-
Deposited papers (14)
-
House of Commons papers (7)
-
House of Lords papers (1)
-
Impact assessments (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (40) + Debates (34)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (20)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (7)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (5)
+ Legislative debates (27)
-
Debates on bills (21)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (6)
+ Statements (6) + Oral statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (1)
-
Written statements (5)
+ Parliamentary questions (323)
-
Business questions (2)
-
Oral questions (21)
-
Written questions (300)
+ Research briefings (8) + Commons Briefing papers (6)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)
-
POSTnotes (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

It is a real pleasure to serve under your chairship, Dame Siobhain. It has been a while since you chaired Westminster Hall; it is always a pleasure to see you and I wish you well. I thank the hon. Member for Warwick and Leamington (Matt Western) for leading the debate;...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 cc457-9WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Warwick and Leamington (Matt Western) on securing this important debate. I extend my congratulations to my hon. Friend the Member for East Renfrewshire (Blair McDougall) on his elevation to His Majesty’s Government. It is an honour and a privilege to be a...

Member
Meg Hillier (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 cc460-5WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Dame Siobhain. I congratulate the hon. Member for Warwick and Leamington (Matt Western) on securing this important debate. What we have heard from hon. Members has been extremely wide-ranging. I will focus the vast majority of my speech on ticket touting...

Member
Steve Darling (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 cc465-6WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to speak for the Opposition in this interesting debate; I congratulate the hon. Member for Warwick and Leamington (Matt Western) on securing it. I add my congratulations to the hon. Member for East Renfrewshire (Blair McDougall) on his appointment. I look forward to potentially confronting him,...

Member
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 cc466-8WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve in my first debate as a Minister under your chairship, Dame Siobhain. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Warwick and Leamington (Matt Western) on securing this debate. I would have felt cheated had the hon. Member for Strangford (Jim Shannon) not been...

Member
Blair McDougall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 cc468-470WH
House
House of Commons

I should have congratulated my hon. Friend at the very beginning on his appointment—a very warm welcome, Minister, to the role. He talks about dynamic pricing and ticketing. He will probably be aware that in the Business and Trade Committee we looked at Ticketmaster and Live Nation. The Opposition spokesperson,...

Member
Matt Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 c470WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a really good point. He referenced the comments made by the hon. Member for West Worcestershire (Dame Harriett Baldwin) on the impact on venues, big or small. It is important to say that there are ways of doing this that are advantageous to everyone. An example...

Member
Blair McDougall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 cc470-1WH
House
House of Commons

Several hon. Members around the Chamber raised the differential pricing between in-town and out-of-town stores. The points the Minister made are totally right, but when retailers were asked about this at the Business and Trade Committee, they just said that it was due to a different cost base. A corporate...

Member
Matt Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 c471WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes his point powerfully. The argument that the Government sometimes hear from business is that it is about the cost of the property. He is shaking his head, and I will try to transmit the shaking of his head throughout the system on his behalf. He makes...

Member
Blair McDougall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 cc471-2WH
House
House of Commons

I thank all those who participated in the debate. It is a Thursday afternoon, and I would have anticipated that a lot more people would have wanted to speak to this issue. I welcome the points that have been made. We have used examples that perhaps bring a certain lightness...

Member
Matt Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 c472WH
House
House of Commons

Motion that this House has considered consumer affairs. Agreed to on question. Sitting adjourned without Question put.

Lead member
Matt Western
Answering member
Harriett Baldwin; Blair McDougall
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Backbench debates
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 cc452-472WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered consumer affairs.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Dame Siobhain. You will be familiar with the expression “knowing the price of everything, but the value of nothing”. Perhaps that was yesteryear, or possibly yesterday, but today I want to say...

Member
Matt Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 cc452-3WH
House
House of Commons

There are other products available, Dame Siobhain, but I will not give an entire list of them. Whatever someone’s guilty pleasure is, though, the products that they have grown up with and loved are not what they were.

Even tubes of toothpaste in boxes, despite appearing to be a similar size...

Member
Matt Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 cc453-7WH
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2025
Reference
772 c457WH
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether his Department plans to provide guidance to Ofcom on maintaining access to (a) affordable and (b) time-sensitive subscription publications, following changes to the Universal Service Obligation.

Asked by
Caroline Dinenage (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 September 2025
Reference
70409
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with reference to her Department's publication entitled MHCLG: spending over £25,000, March 2025, published on 28 April 2025, what the goods or services commissioned from HM Treasury entitled subscription were.

Asked by
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 July 2025
Reference
67388
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what information his Department holds on the amount of income generated by the Ordnance Survey from public subscriptions in the last five years.

Asked by
Simon Opher (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 July 2025
Reference
64092
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 14 May 2025 to Question 48955 on MI5: Stonewall, for what reason MI5 renewed its membership of Stonewall.

Asked by
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 June 2025
Reference
58665
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I rise to express my deep concern about the inclusion of the clause repealing Section 116B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, and to urge that it be removed in its entirety from the Bill.

The clause does not merely tidy up legislation or...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2025
Reference
846 cc1305-7
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 8 April 2025 to Question 42602 on Stonewall subscriptions, whether MI5 pays subscription fees to Stonewall.

Asked by
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
48955
House
House of Commons

To ask the hon. Member for Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney, representing the House of Commons Commission, pursuant to the Answer of 23 April 2025 to Question 44588 on Parliament: Television, whether any public bodies pay subscription fees to receive a direct television feed of the UK Parliament.

Asked by
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Answering body
House of Commons Commission
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 May 2025
Reference
48183
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chairman of the Public Accounts Commission, pursuant to the Answer of 8 April 2025 to Question 42602 on Stonewall: Subscriptions, whether the National Audit Office pays subscription fees to Stonewall.

Asked by
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Answering body
Public Accounts Commission
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 May 2025
Reference
48957
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, pursuant to the Answer of 12 December 2024 to Question 18221 on Supreme Court: Judgments, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of the Supreme Court ruling on the (a) practices of the Cabinet Office and (b) its Arms Length...

Asked by
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
46760
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether his Department has received representations from providers of digital content subscription services on the potential impact of proposals on cooling-off rights within the new subscription contract regime under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024.

Asked by
James Frith (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 April 2025
Reference
45802
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what steps he is taking to help mitigate the potential impact of his Department's proposals for cooling-off rights within the subscription contract regime under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 on digital content streaming services.

Asked by
James Frith (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 April 2025
Reference
45803
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether he has had meetings with providers of digital content subscription services on the potential impact of proposals on cooling-off rights within the new subscription contract regime under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024.

Asked by
James Frith (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 April 2025
Reference
45804
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, with reference to the consultation on the implementation of the new subscription contracts regime, published on 18 November 2024, whether the provisions on subscription contracts will apply to the (a) sale and (b) marketing of trade union membership.

Asked by
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 April 2025
Reference
45920
House
House of Commons
BBC

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, if she will make an estimate of moving the BBC to a commercial subscription-based model on costs to the public purse.

Asked by
Peter Bedford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2025
Reference
46600
House
House of Commons

To ask the hon. Member for Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney, representing the House of Commons Commission, which public bodies have a live television feed to Parliament other than BBC Parliament; and what the annual cost is of such a subscription.

Asked by
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Answering body
House of Commons Commission
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 April 2025
Reference
44588
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what recent discussions she has had with the Secretary of State for Business and Trade on the potential impact of the subscriptions regime in the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 on the level of investment in the...

Asked by
Louie French (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 April 2025
Reference
44619
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether the (a) Office for National Statistics, (b) National Audit Office, (c) Northern Ireland Civil Service, (d) Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, (e) GCHQ, (f) MI5, (g) SIS and (h) Crown Commercial Service pay subscription fees to Stonewall.

Asked by
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 April 2025
Reference
42602
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, whether she has had recent discussions with the Secretary of State for Business and Trade on the effectiveness of proposed exemptions to cooling-off rights within the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 subscription regime for preventing consumers from...

Asked by
Stuart Andrew (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 April 2025
Reference
42221
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, whether she has had recent discussions with the Secretary of State for Business and Trade on the potential impact of the subscriptions regime in the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 on the level of investment in the...

Asked by
Stuart Andrew (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 April 2025
Reference
41831
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment each government body or department has made of the value for money of the subscription fees paid to the Business Disability Forum for (1) membership or (2) partnership, and what criteria were used for each assessment.

Asked by
Lord Shinkwin (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 April 2025
Reference
HL5932
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government how much each government department or body that is (1) a member, or (2) a partner, of the Business Disability Forum has paid in subscription fees in each year of its membership or partnership.

Asked by
Lord Shinkwin (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 April 2025
Reference
HL5930
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of proposals on cooling-off rights in the consultation on the implementation of the new subscription contracts regime, published on 18 November 2024, on (a) the heritage sector and (b) visitor attractions.

Asked by
Stuart Andrew (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 April 2025
Reference
40480
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by the Parliamentary Secretary at the Cabinet Office on 22 October 2024 (HC8818), and further to the Written Statement by Baroness Neville-Rolfe on 14 May 2024 (HLWS462), whether the equality, diversity and inclusion spending controls announced in that Written Statement apply to decisions...

Asked by
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
HL5554
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Gustafsson
Answering member
Viscount Camrose
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
17 March 2025
Reference
844 cc297-303GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this instrument was laid before the House on 18 December 2024 and relates to the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024—the DMCC Act—which received Royal Assent in May 2024. The instrument makes amendments to legislation in consequence of Parts 3 and 4, and Chapter 2 of Part...

Member
Baroness Gustafsson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2025
Reference
844 cc297-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the shocking thing is that it was only in May of last year that we were working on the then DMCC Bill. It feels, frankly, a great deal longer ago; an awful lot has happened and a lot has changed. Some of the substantive aspects of what I...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2025
Reference
844 cc298-1099GC
House
House of Lords

Lest you forget, my Lords. The rest of the Minister’s response to the question from the noble Baroness, Lady Stowell, was:

“Ministers recognise the high importance of foreign states not being allowed to influence the policy of UK newspapers, but there should be a balance to encourage investment into the press...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2025
Reference
844 c301GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing this SI and the noble Lord, Lord Fox, for his characteristically thought-provoking remarks, particularly those on the dynamics of data bridges between the EU and the US, which were very pertinent.

The measures in this SI are intended to facilitate the effective implementation...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2025
Reference
844 cc301-2GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord and the noble Viscount for their thoughtful contributions in this debate. I will try to address each of the points raised in turn.

First, the noble Lord, Lord Fox, talked about how much has changed since May 2024 and I really see that, whether it is...

Member
Baroness Gustafsson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2025
Reference
844 cc302-4GC
House
House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many social media accounts their Department operates; and how much their Department spent on social media (a) subscriptions and (b) advertisements on each social media platform in each of the last three years.

Asked by
Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 March 2025
Reference
35133
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many social media accounts the Prime Minister's Office operates; and how much the Prime Minister's Office spent on social media (a) subscriptions and (b) advertisements on each social media platform in each of the last three years.

Asked by
Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 March 2025
Reference
35127
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, with reference to his Department's consultation on the implementation of the new subscription contract regime under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of proposals on cooling-off rights on the...

Asked by
Jo Platt (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 March 2025
Reference
34306
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, with reference to the Department of Culture, Media and Sport's consultation on the implementation of the new subscription contract regime under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of proposals...

Asked by
Jo Platt (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 March 2025
Reference
34307
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much was claimed for trade union subscriptions under section 344 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 in each of the last five years.

Asked by
John Glen (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 February 2025
Reference
31993
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Justin Madders
Answering member
Greg Smith
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
First Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
10 February 2025
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she plans to bring forward legislative proposals to amend Gift Aid legislation to ensure that charities who rely on a membership subscription model can continue to claim Gift Aid while complying with the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024.

Asked by
Stuart Andrew (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 January 2025
Reference
25667
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many Bloomberg subscriptions her Department has.

Asked by
James Wild (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 January 2025
Reference
23862
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, which news services her Department holds subscriptions to.

Asked by
Gareth Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 January 2025
Reference
23899
House
House of Commons

Clauses 45, 47-49 agreed to. Clause 46 as amended, agreed to. Clause 48, amendment 126, negatived on division (3 to 11).

Lead member
Justin Madders
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Employment Rights Bill Committee
Date
7 January 2025
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what assessment he has made of the implications for the Government's policies on departmental check-off arrangements of Supreme Court judgment [2024] UKSC 41 relating to (a) Secretary of State for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs v Public and Commercial...

Asked by
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 2024
Reference
18221
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, if he will make an assessment of the adequacy of the accessibility of the consultation on the implementation of the new subscription contracts regime, published on 18 November 2024.

Asked by
Peter Fortune (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 December 2024
Reference
16891
House
House of Commons

Consultation on the implementation of the new subscription contracts regime. 75p.

Deposited by
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Consultation papers; Deposited papers
Date
18 November 2024
Reference
DEP2024-0748
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

The Department for Business and Trade has today published a consultation called ‘Consultation on the Implementation of the New Subscriptions Contracts Regime’.

The consultation seeks views on provisions to be made in secondary legislation to set out how the regime operates and is related to the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers...

Member
Justin Madders (Labour)
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written statements
Date
18 November 2024
Reference
HCWS223
House
House of Commons

My Hon Friend the Minister for Employment Rights, Competition and Markets (Justin Madders MP) hastoday made the following statement.

The Department for Business and Trade has today published a consultation called ‘Consultation on the Implementation of the New Subscriptions Contracts Regime’.

The consultation seeks views on provisions to be made in secondary...

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written statements
Date
18 November 2024
Reference
HLWS227
House
House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, pursuant to the Answer of 12 September 2024 to Question 4654 on Public Sector: Trade Unions, what the Government's policy is on check-off; and how many departments (a) charge trade unions for levying check-off and (b) have no check-off arrangements.

Asked by
John Glen (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2024
Reference
8431
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether he has plans to bring forward proposals to make it easier to cancel online subscriptions.

Asked by
Graeme Downie (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 2024
Reference
10230
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of the decision by the US Federal Trade Commission to require online subscription services to allow users to cancel more easily on UK consumers.

Asked by
Graeme Downie (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 October 2024
Reference
10231
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of the decision by the US Federal Trade Commission to require online subscription services to be cancelled more easily on the UK.

Asked by
Graeme Downie (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 October 2024
Reference
10232
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, pursuant to the Answer of 22 July 2024 to Question 902 on Public sector: trade unions, whether it is the Government's policy to (a) amend and (b) repeal the check-off provisions from the (i) Trade Union Act 2016 and (ii)...

Asked by
John Glen (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 September 2024
Reference
4654
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what his policy is on check-off in the public sector.

Asked by
John Glen (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 August 2024
Reference
902
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Bim Afolami
Answering member
Tulip Siddiq
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Third Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
13 May 2024
House
House of Commons

The point about a “proportionate” response is relevant. In the original drafting of the Bill, the word used was “appropriate.” The Government changed that to “proportionate” on Report in this House, and the Lords have sought to reverse that change. What does the Minister think was disproportionate, if you like,...

Member
Damian Collins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c178
House
House of Commons

We have engaged significantly, throughout the Bill’s passage and before it was introduced, with large tech and challenger tech. Our understanding is that all those cohorts are happy with where the Bill is today. Certainly, during that engagement, concerns were raised about the term “appropriate,” but the clear position that...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c178
House
House of Commons

It is clearly important that we understand what “proportionate” means in this context. Is the Government’s position that proportionality implies that there is more for the CMA to think about than just how effectively the imposition of a conduct requirement would fulfil the CMA’s requirements? If so, what can the...

Member
Jeremy Wright (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c178
House
House of Commons

My right hon. and learned Friend will know from his legal background that the term “proportionate” is well established in law. Of course, the courts play an important part here. We do not prescribe everything in our legislation; there is quite rightly the opportunity for people to challenge certain decisions...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c179
House
House of Commons

The Minister suggested that stakeholders were now satisfied with the Bill. I can tell him that there is concern about the change from “appropriate” to “proportionate.” The fear is that it will enable the courts to look more broadly, and will allow more scope for challenge than was intended when...

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c179
House
House of Commons

It is not our intention. Our intention is to strike a balance. As I have said, the courts’ approach to proportionality was set out by the Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v. Her Majesty’s Treasury (No. 2), when the Court described the elements to be considered, including, most notably,

“whether a...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 cc179-180
House
House of Commons

I am very grateful to the Minister for giving way. I know that we have debated this point before, and I will discuss it further in my contribution, but I make the point again that there may be legislation, but it is not working. There have been only two prosecutions...

Member
Sharon Hodgson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c180
House
House of Commons

It is not right to say that there have been only two prosecutions—

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c180
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Sharon Hodgson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c180
House
House of Commons

I will just finish this answer. There have been two sentences. Two people got a £6.1 million fine. There were four more successful prosecutions in Leeds Crown court only very recently, and sentence is due to be imposed on those individuals. The hon. Lady raises important points, and did great...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c180
House
House of Commons

The Government claim that they are doing enough, but that is just not the case. Here is an example for the Minister: on secondary ticketing sites, three tickets for the Taylor Swift show on 21 June are going for £72,000. They had a face value of £170 each. How is...

Member
Baroness Keeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c180
House
House of Commons

I agree that some of the examples are shocking. The key question is what measures we will put in place to address them. Ireland, for example, completely banned secondary sales, yet the prices seen

on the internet are equivalent to what the hon. Lady describes, so there is no perfect...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 cc180-1
House
House of Commons

First, I pay tribute to my much-loved neighbour, my hon. Friend the Member for Pontypridd (Alex Davies-Jones), who led for Labour during the last round of proceedings on the Bill, and to my hon. Friend the Member for Feltham and Heston (Seema Malhotra), who led for us when the Bill...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c181
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c181
House
House of Commons

Of course I will, to the right hon. Gentleman—another gentleman for whom I have a great deal of respect, and with whom I occasionally disagree.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c181
House
House of Commons

I just wonder whether the transformation that the hon. Gentleman describes, which occurs when somebody moves from the Back Benches to the Front Bench, applies equally to the Opposition and the Government.

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c182
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman knows more about bobbing between the Back Benches and the Front Bench than most Members of Parliament in history, I think. It is obviously a problem; I do believe in shared responsibility of Government—we want Governments to act as a single body, and not irresponsibly—so I...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 cc182-3
House
House of Commons

How would a tribunal consider the appropriateness of a CMA intervention without considering the detail and merit of it?

Member
Jeremy Wright (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c183
House
House of Commons

The point is that either the change is necessary because a new and different measure is being adopted by the Government, in which case it is a lower threshold and therefore inappropriate, or the change makes no difference whatsoever, in which case it is unnecessary. The normal standards for deciding...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 cc183-5
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend give way?

Member
Sharon Hodgson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c186
House
House of Commons

I feel the fingernails.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c186
House
House of Commons

I waited until my hon. Friend got to the end of all those disgraceful, abhorrent examples. Will he clarify for me a fallacy that the touts often put around about me and my hon. Friends—they will say the same about him? They say that we want to stop people being...

Member
Sharon Hodgson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c186
House
House of Commons

I completely agree, and that is Labour party policy. I am used to fallacies being written about me, and I have seen many written about my hon. Friend as well. I am sure we will all get over it. Incidentally, that is why, as I shall come on to say...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c186
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Baroness Keeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c186
House
House of Commons

I feel more fingernails.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c186
House
House of Commons

My fingernails are nothing like as bad. Does my hon. Friend agree that the problem is actually worse than just the prices he quoted, of which he gave some really good and powerful examples, because of the selling of tickets that do not actually exist—fraudulent tickets? I have heard from...

Member
Baroness Keeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c186
House
House of Commons

I completely agree, and my hon. Friend is absolutely right. There are terrible instances of all sorts of different scams, and—this is the honest truth—remarkably few prosecutions. Whether the number is two, four or five, it should be in the hundreds. [Interruption.] Six—half a dozen—great!

The truth is that we all...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 cc186-7
House
House of Commons

It was your idea.

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c187
House
House of Commons

Well, we have moved on and it is about time the Government moved on—in fact I look forward to the day when the Minister moves on from Government Benches to here on the Opposition Benches. The idea of a review at the dog end of a Parliament and at the...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 cc187-8
House
House of Commons

May I start by saying that this was and still is a good Bill? It does an enormous number of very important things and I am glad to see that it has broad acceptance and agreement on both sides of the House, although with some minor points of disagreement. It...

Member
John Penrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c188
House
House of Commons

I am very happy to make that commitment. We believe the Bill draws a clear distinction between infringement decisions and penalty decisions. After taking legal advice on this matter and looking at

previous competition case law considering similar issues, the Government consider that neither the Competition Appeal Tribunal nor the...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c188
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for that intervention and, emboldened by my success so far in getting him to front up, I move on to my second point, which has similar concerns around it: the issue of countervailing benefits. We have heard from the Opposition spokesman about that, so I will...

Member
John Penrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c189
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c189
House
House of Commons

He does, which is marvellous.

Member
John Penrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c189
House
House of Commons

The revised wording did not change the effects of the clause. Strategic market status firms will still have to prove that there is no other reasonable and practicable way to achieve the same benefits for consumers with less competitive effect.

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
749 c189
House
House of Commons