Skip to main content

1-20 of 78 results for subject:"Baluchistan Liberation Army"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Secretary Yvette Cooper
Department
Home Office
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
26 February 2025
Reference
SI 2025/210
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if she will publish the evidence provided by the Pakistani authorities which was taken into account by the Government when deciding to proscribe the Baluchistan Liberation Army;

Asked by
John McDonnell (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 April 2008
Reference
474 c1462-4W; 197786
House
House of Commons

(2) what evidence formed the basis for the Government's decision to proscribe the Baluchistan Liberation Army;

Asked by
John McDonnell (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 April 2008
Reference
474 c1462-4W; 197787
House
House of Commons

(4) what the reasons were for the timing of the decision to proscribe the Baluchistan Liberation Army in 2006.

Asked by
John McDonnell (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 April 2008
Reference
474 c1462-4W; 197790
House
House of Commons

(3) what criteria were applied in the decision-making process which led to the proscribing of the Baluchistan Liberation Army;

Asked by
John McDonnell (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 April 2008
Reference
474 c1462-4W; 197788
House
House of Commons

(2) for what reasons the Baluchistan National Liberation Army was proscribed as a terrorist organisation; and if she will make a statement.

Asked by
Chris Mullin (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 January 2008
Reference
470 c302W; 174586
House
House of Commons

My Lords, as noble Lords will be relieved to know, I can be relatively brief as the noble Lord, Lord Waddington, has clearly and precisely outlined the ground that I had intended to cover. However, I will make a preliminary point relating to the debate in the other place at...

Member
Lord Russell-Johnston (Liberal Democrat; Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1616-7
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on Terrorism Act 2000 (proscribed organisations) (amendment). Lords debate on motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
Answering member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1610-20
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank the Minister for introducing the order. It is impossible to have a detailed discussion about the merits of proscribing these four groups to assess whether it is right to proscribe them. Of necessity, the Government must work on the accuracy of the intelligence that they...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1613-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for explaining the terms of the order. My honourable friend Mr Patrick Mercer, the shadow Minister for Homeland Security, made it clear when this matter was debated in another place last Thursday that we strongly support the making of the order. The police and...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1612-3
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the draft order laid before the House on 17 July be approved [34th Report from the Joint Committee and 42nd Report from the Merits Committee]. The noble Baroness said: My Lords, Section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000 provides a power for the Home Secretary to...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1610-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not attempt to name any of the four organisations, because I am sure I would get them wrong. I say at once that I have no difficulty at all with the third and fourth of the organisations. I have questions about the first two organisations. First,...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1614-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I follow briefly the noble Baroness, Lady Harris of Richmond, who referred to the PMOI, which was proscribed in 2001 and is one of the bodies listed in Schedule 2 to the Terrorism Act 2000, the list to which four bodies are to be added today. I do...

Member
Lord Waddington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1615-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, none of your Lordships would wish to challenge the fact that it is the duty of Governments to protect their citizens from terrorist activities. I neither challenge that nor wish to say anything about the four organisations listed, because the Secretary of State, his department and his Ministers...

Member
Lord Slynn of Hadley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1617-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have supported this order, in particular the noble Baroness, Lady Anelay, who has given such trenchant support to the orders and the necessity for them. I hope that I will be able to provide comfort to other noble Lords, too. I can...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1618-20
House
House of Lords

Not least for the benefit of others who may go down that route, let me say that the PMOI currently has an application for de-proscription before the Home Secretary. However much people wax lyrical about it, I shall not comment on it. It would not be appropriate to do that....

Member
Tony McNulty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2006
Reference
449 c502-3
House
House of Commons

I take the hon. Gentleman’s point, but in the context of the order, there is clear evidence against TAK, and there is already substantive evidence against the PKK. The other two organisations that we propose to proscribe in an order under the negative procedure are simply successors to the PKK....

Member
Tony McNulty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2006
Reference
449 c494
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. Will the Minister ensure that, when these provisions are reviewed in future, all the organisations that seek to take young men and turn them into terrorists are kept properly under review? Will he also ensure that any organisations that act as generators of extremism and...

Member
Lord Gove (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2006
Reference
449 c506
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Gentleman in one respect—that we must not proscribe organisations simply because another country with which we may be friendly believes that they are undemocratic. However, I have to say that there are clear cases where Kurdish organisations are engaged in terrorist acts, and those are...

Member
David Heath (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2006
Reference
449 c501-2
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend. Arguably, section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2006 could also be used. He is not alone in expressing concern about proscription. The Joint Committee on Human Rights also argued in paragraph 63 of its third report that extending the ground for proscription to cover...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2006
Reference
449 c502
House
House of Commons