Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 24 July 2006. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2006.


Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2006

My Lords, I will not attempt to name any of the four organisations, because I am sure I would get them wrong. I say at once that I have no difficulty at all with the third and fourth of the organisations. I have questions about the first two organisations. First, could they in fact have been proscribed under the existing law without having resort to the 2006 Act? Secondly, could the Minister give us some indication of the membership of the first two organisations in the United Kingdom? How many people will be affected by the proscription? Thirdly, she has not mentioned Hizb ut-Tahrir. There was a strong rumour at one stage that it would be proscribed under the new legislation. I am very glad if it be the fact that it has not been. Has a decision been taken not to proscribe Hizb ut-Tahrir?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c1614-5 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Appeals Internet National security Proscribed organisations Terrorism Encouragement of terrorism Teyrebaz Azadiye Kurdistan Saved Sect Baluchistan Liberation Army al Ghurabaa
Legislation
Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2006
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk