Proceeding contribution from Tony McNulty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 20 July 2006. It occurred during Legislative debate on Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism.
Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism
I take the hon. Gentleman’s point, but in the context of the order, there is clear evidence against TAK, and there is already substantive evidence against the PKK. The other two organisations that we propose to proscribe in an order under the negative procedure are simply successors to the PKK. If a body is not a terrorist organisation in terms, as defined in various Acts and in the judgment and review of the Government, it will not appear on a list for proscription.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 449 c494
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Appeals Assets National security Proscribed organisations Terrorism Teyrebaz Azadiye Kurdistan Saved Sect Baluchistan Liberation Army al Ghurabaa Statutory instruments
- Legislation
- Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2006
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 00:34:34 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_339805
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_339805
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_339805