Skip to main content

1-20 of 54 results for subject:"Defence Intelligence Staff"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Command papers
Notes
Series maintained in HA for 6 years
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
Cm 7807
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); Command papers
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
Cm 7808
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my noble friend; he is, quite rightly, in an expansive mode. Does he agree that Mr Jonathan Evans, the head of MI5, is a dedicated public servant and is a successful head of the Security Service, and that the Security Service is a complex team that...

Member
Lord Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
711 c245GC
House
House of Lords

I was absolutely spot on at the start when I predicted that we would have a very well informed and comprehensive debate. I am pleased to say that I can be very brief in my reply, mainly because the Minister has answered all the awkward questions, for which I am...

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
711 c268-70GC
House
House of Lords

That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Intelligence and Security Committee Annual Report for 2007—08.

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
711 c245GC
House
House of Lords

I have had the great privilege of representing your Lordships’ House on the Intelligence and Security Committee since 2007. This is, however, the first opportunity that we have had—and that I have had on behalf of the committee—to report on its work to the House in a Grand Committee debate...

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
711 c245GC
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to consider the Intelligence and Security Committee Annual Report for 2007-08 (Cm 7542). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock
Answering member
Lord West of Spithead
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
711 c245-70GC
House
House of Lords

This afternoon we are debating what is, compared with some of its earlier reports, one of the more detailed and informative reports that the Intelligence and Security Committee has produced. I follow others in the Committee in congratulating the committee on its work. I need no convincing that the committee...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
711 c256-61GC
House
House of Lords

I agree with everything that my noble friend has said and I shall elaborate further on that later in my speech. As my noble friend Lord Jones knows, the Intelligence and Security Committee has as its statutory duty a remit to examine the administration, policy and finance of the UK’s...

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
711 c245-50GC
House
House of Lords

I congratulate the committee on its hard work and on the production of this report, and I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, on the way he has presented it to us today. It is clear that the committee was not asterisked out, and I do not regard this as...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
711 c253-6GC
House
House of Lords

I should declare an interest in that the report covers some of the time that I was director-general. I did not retire until April 2007. I am not entirely certain, therefore, whether it is proper for me, rather unexpectedly, to be in the position of responding to a report which...

Member
Baroness Manningham-Buller (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
711 c251-3GC
House
House of Lords

I must begin with a profound apology. I have read and written about the wrong report. I read Could 7/7 Have Been Prevented? with great care, but I have only just been able to read the major report that we are considering today. So I deeply apologise. My comments will...

Member
Baroness Park of Monmouth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
711 c250-1GC
House
House of Lords

I am pleased to have the opportunity to speak in this debate. I am sure that we all join together in welcoming the reforms. Noble Lords have not touched on this matter, but we are debating the report for the first time in the House of Lords and that is...

Member
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2009
Reference
711 c261-8GC
House
House of Lords

My right honourable friend the Minister of State for the Armed Forces (Bob Ainsworth) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. This Statement follows on from the one that I made on 13 December 2007 (Official Report, col. WS 55). I am pleased to announce the approval of the plan...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
27 April 2009
Reference
710 c6-7WS
House
House of Lords

This statement follows on from the one that I made on 13 December 2007, Official Report, column WS55. I am pleased to announce the approval of the plan to collocate intelligence facilities at RAF Wyton under the Programme to Rationalise and Integrate the Defence Intelligence Estate, known as PRIDE. PRIDE...

Member
Bob Ainsworth (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
27 April 2009
Reference
491 c33-4WS
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many staff the Defence Intelligence Staff employed in each year since 1997, broken down by (a) civilian staff and (b) service; and what the projected numbers for the next five years are.

Asked by
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 March 2009
Reference
489 c774W;489 c776W; 257680
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the size of the Defence Intelligence Staff was in each year since 1997.

Asked by
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 February 2009
Reference
487 c1527-8W; 253716
House
House of Commons
My Lords, I am sure that the whole House will wish to join me in offering sincere condolences to the families and friends of Marines Robert McKibben and Neil Dunstan and Colour Sergeant Krishnabahadur Dura, who were killed on operations in Afghanistan this week. As part of the Ministry of Defence’s streamlining exercise, Defence Intelligence Staff elements based in central London will be reduced in size by around 20 per cent. DIS establishments outside central London, which constitute nearly 90 per cent of its overall manpower, are not affected by streamlining. Streamlining will improve the way in which the MoD head office works, creating a smaller, more agile and efficient organisation.
Answered by
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 November 2008
Reference
705 c1012
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I thank the Minister for that Answer. She will recall the Butler inquiry four years ago, of which she was a member. It said: "““DIS is a vital component of and contributor to the national intelligence machinery … DIS is crucial to MoD in everything from strategic planning through equipment acquisition to the conduct of military operations””." Is not any reduction in intelligence provision to our Armed Forces akin to committing them to combat with inadequate or inferior equipment? With ongoing operations, surely that is both operationally and morally indefensible.
Asked by
Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 November 2008
Reference
705 c1012-3
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the noble and gallant Lord knows very well the work done by defence intelligence, as do I. He mentioned that I served on the Butler review. The review said that if increased funding to the single intelligence account was required to commission DIS expert resources, that funding should be found. Most of the extra funding that has gone to the single intelligence budget has been for counterterrorism work. We are satisfied that the changes that we are making will not have an adverse effect. As I said, 90 per cent of the staff of DIS work outside London, and they are not at all affected.
Answered by
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 November 2008
Reference
705 c1012-3
House
House of Lords