1-20 of 51 results for subject:"Major, John"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.307 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Major, John"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Major, John" OR subject_t:"John Major" OR subject_ses:302081
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, with reference to the House of Commons Library Research Paper 96/53 of 19 April 1996 on Questions of Procedure for Ministers, if she will request that the National Archives place in the Library a copy of the letter...
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, with reference to the House of Commons Library Research Paper 96/53 of 19 April 1996 on Questions of Procedure for Ministers, if she will request that the National Archives place in the Library a copy of the letter...
This letter is already in the Library. It was placed there in 1994 as part of the evidence to the Treasury and Civil Service Select Committee.
To ask Her Majesty's Government how much is spent on providing personal security protection for (a) Mr Tony Blair, (b) Sir John Major, and (c) Baroness Thatcher.
To ask Her Majesty's Government how much is spent on providing personal security protection for (a) Mr Tony Blair, (b) Sir John Major, and (c) Baroness Thatcher.
That this House recalls the former Conservative Prime Minister and Conservative Party Leader John Major 'unequivocally' assuring the House on the publication of the Auditor's provisional findings of gerrymandering in Westminster that 'if the reported allegations turn out to be true, of course I condemn such activities' (Hansard column 330, 13th January 1994) and 'I have already made it clear that if the allegations are confirmed, I will condemn unreservedly' (Hansard column 331, 13th January 1994); similarly recalls that the Right honourable Member for Chingford and Woodford Green to the House that the accused 'must be subject to the due process of law. If they are found guilty, they should be sanctioned accordingly' (Hansard column 849, 14th May 1996); notes that five law lords have delivered a unanimous judgement, finding Shirley Porter and David Weeks, former Conservative leaders of Westminster City Council guilty of 'political corruption' and 'deliberate, blatant and dishonest misuse of public power' at a cost to council tax payers of ??26.4 million; further notes the conclusion of Lord Scott of Foscote in the judgement that 'there is no further European Court of Human Rights point that can be taken' and that the judicial process is now at an end; and calls upon the right honourable Member for Chingford and Woodford Green to honour his and his predecessor's pledges.
That this House recalls the former Conservative Prime Minister and Conservative Party Leader John Major 'unequivocally' assuring the House on the publication of the Auditor's provisional findings of gerrymandering in Westminster that 'if the reported allegations turn out to be true, of course I condemn such activities' (Hansard column 330,...
That this House condemns the fact, despite assurances previously given by the former Conservative Prime Minister, the Right honourable Member for Huntingdon, that he would unreservedly condemn Dame Shirley Porter if she were found guilty in a court of law, no condemnation or criticism has yet been made by any Conservative Member of this House or of Westminster City Council consequent upon the judgement of the High Court of 19th December 1997, that Dame Shirley Porter and Councillor David Weeks (formerly Lead and Deputy Leader of Westminster City Council) were guilty of wilful misconduct resulting in a loss to Westminster City Council of ??27,023,376 as a consequence of their illegal homes for votes gerrymandering policy, carried out on behalf of the Conservative Party; also condemns the failure of Westminster City Council to take any steps whatsoever to recover ??27 million now owed to the people of Westminster; notes that Dame Shirley Porter was made a Dame of the British Empire in recognition of her services to local government, but, in view of the court's judgement, considers that she is no longer a fit person to hold this honour; and calls upon the Government to make representation to Her Majesty the Queen to remove from Dame Shirley Porter her DBE.
That this House condemns the fact, despite assurances previously given by the former Conservative Prime Minister, the Right honourable Member for Huntingdon, that he would unreservedly condemn Dame Shirley Porter if she were found guilty in a court of law, no condemnation or criticism has yet been made by any...
Business question on comment made by the Prime Minister on the Frost Programme and government business.
Business question on comment made by the Prime Minister on the Frost Programme and government business.
That this House regrets the failure of the Prime Minister to withdraw his claim that every aspect of a press release on the Prime Minister's record issued by the honourable Member for Holborn and St. Pancras was a falsehood; and notes that despite being given the opportunity to do so he has failed to identify a single inaccuracy, still less a falsehood, in the press release in question.
That this House regrets the failure of the Prime Minister to withdraw his claim that every aspect of a press release on the Prime Minister's record issued by the honourable Member for Holborn and St. Pancras was a falsehood; and notes that despite being given the opportunity to do so...
That this House notes the response made by the Prime Minister to the honourable Member for Glasgow, Shettlestone at Oral Questions on 10th March and his claim that the fieldwork for the System Three poll published on 8th March in the Herald showing 13 per cent. support for the Conservative party was undertaken prior to his visit to Scotland on 18th February; notes, however, in contrast to the Prime Minister's assertion, that the dates for the fieldwork were in fact, 24th February to 3rd March; and calls upon the Prime Minister to correct his mistake at the earliest opportunity.
That this House notes the response made by the Prime Minister to the honourable Member for Glasgow, Shettlestone at Oral Questions on 10th March and his claim that the fieldwork for the System Three poll published on 8th March in the Herald showing 13 per cent. support for the Conservative...
That this House notes with grave concern that the Right honourable Member for Huntingdon has asked British Telecom to re-site the Hemingford Grey village telephone box despite the fact that the local parish council objects to this, and despite the fact that he has had a 1,126 signature petition demanding that the telephone box remained in its present location; therefore supports the Hemingford Grey Parish Council's request to the Prime Minister to attend their next meeting to explain his actions; and hopes that British Telecom will support the overwhelming views of local residents and withdraw their plans to re-locate this telephone box.
That this House notes with grave concern that the Right honourable Member for Huntingdon has asked British Telecom to re-site the Hemingford Grey village telephone box despite the fact that the local parish council objects to this, and despite the fact that he has had a 1,126 signature petition demanding...
That this House notes the recent statements made by the Prime Minister on Breakfast with Frost in which he expressed regret at having to raise taxes because of the recession after having made pre-election commitments to reduce taxes because of the recession after having made pre-election commitments to reduce taxes and stated 'I did not expect that we would have to put up taxes ... If I had thought that I would have indicated the reverse"; reminds the Prime Minister that the pre-election promises were made at the time when the recession was at least 25 months old and nearing its end, and that in April 1992 the public sector borrowing requirement for 1992-93 was projected by the Treasury at ??30 billion and rising; reminds the Prime Minister that at that time most forecasters estimated that at least half of that ??30 billion deficit was structural, implying that taxes would have to rise by some ??15 billion; and therefore notes that the Prime Minister's statements are in conflict with the economic realities fully known to him before the election and believes that he cannot evade his election promises so glibly.
That this House notes the recent statements made by the Prime Minister on Breakfast with Frost in which he expressed regret at having to raise taxes because of the recession after having made pre-election commitments to reduce taxes because of the recession after having made pre-election commitments to reduce taxes...
That this House contrasts the statement of the Prime Minister, 17th November 1992, Official Report, column 136, that Ministers did not mislead the House with the answer given to the honourable Member for Newport West on 19th April 1990, saying that the Government would not initiate investigations into the Iraqi nuclear weapons programme because in the words of the then Foreign Office Minister, the right honourable Member for Bristol West 'Iraq is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and as such has undertaken not to develop nuclear weapons. We expect Iraq to abide by her international legal obligations'.
That this House contrasts the statement of the Prime Minister, 17th November 1992, Official Report, column 136, that Ministers did not mislead the House with the answer given to the honourable Member for Newport West on 19th April 1990, saying that the Government would not initiate investigations into the Iraqi...