Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:"Norris, Ian"

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords debate on unstarred question on whether, in the light of experience and the fact that the United Kingdom has ratified the treaty while the United States has not, they will now review the operation of the 2003 extradition treaty with the United States.

Lead member
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
Answering member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
Department
Home Office
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
30 June 2005
Reference
673 c399-412
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for interrupting again. Is the Minister suggesting that an American prosecutor’s view of probable cause is as adequate a protection as the view of a British judge.

Member
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2005
Reference
673 c409
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise only to draw the noble Lord’s attention to the Companion to the Standing Orders at paragraphs 4.51 to 4.59, which relate to sub judice matters. I cannot judge what is and what is not sub judice, but I think that the noble Lord is extremely close...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2005
Reference
673 c403
House
House of Lords

rose to ask Her   Majesty’s Government whether, in the light of experience and the fact that the United Kingdom has ratified the treaty while the United States has not, they will now review the operation of the 2003 extradition treaty with the United States. The noble Lord said: My Lords, I...

Member
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2005
Reference
673 c399-403
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with respect, the noble Lord is talking about it, which is the problem.

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2005
Reference
673 c403
House
House of Lords

My Lords, of course I accept that rebuke from the noble Lord. I specifically said that I did not want the noble Baroness to discuss the case.

Member
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2005
Reference
673 c403
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts, for returning to the issue of extradition to the USA, on which, as he said, we have already had several debates and Questions. I also admire his dexterity in shifting seamlessly from community interest companies to...

Member
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2005
Reference
673 c404-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my quotations are from the US Department of Justice and Mr Hammond, but I accept what the noble Lord says and will ensure that I go no further on that. Those excerpts speak for themselves. They suggest that, rather than being used as a fast-track method for extraditing...

Member
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2005
Reference
673 c403
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness for giving way.

Member
Lord Monson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2005
Reference
673 c407
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should perhaps have made clear, as I hope I had in my speech, that nothing I have said implies any criticism of the drafting of the Extradition Act itself. Apart from the treaty, which is a separate matter, I am critical of the use that the Government...

Member
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2005
Reference
673 c406
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as ever, I am most grateful to the noble Baroness. Could she   confirm that every country with an extradition arrangement with the US has a reciprocal arrangement, except for Ireland and France? However, Ireland and France have built into the treaty special provisions to balance that non-reciprocity relating to...

Member
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2005
Reference
673 c408
House
House of Lords

Will the Leader of the House find time for an urgent debate on the case of Mr. Ian Norris, a constituent of mine who faces deportation to the USA on alleged price-fixing offences? The last of those alleged offences took place before 2003, when price fixing became a criminal offence...

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
16 June 2005
Reference
435 c401
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has made his point very effectively, and I am sure that those responsible for these matters will have heard him. He knows full well that it is not appropriate for Ministers to comment on, or to intervene in, current legal cases.

Member
Geoffrey Hoon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2005
Reference
435 c401
House
House of Commons