Skip to main content

Question for short debate on Thursday, 30 June 2005, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts. The answering member was Baroness Scotland of Asthal.


Extradition: UK and USA

Lords debate on unstarred question on whether, in the light of experience and the fact that the United Kingdom has ratified the treaty while the United States has not, they will now review the operation of the 2003 extradition treaty with the United States.


Secondary information

Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
673 c399-412 
Session
2005-06
Department
Home Office
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Proceeding contributions
Lord Bassam of Brighton | 673 c403 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I rise only to draw the noble Lord’s attention to the Companion to the Standing Orders at ...
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 673 c399-403 (Link to this contribution) rose to ask Her   Majesty’s Government whether, in the light of experience and the fact that the Uni...
Show all contributions (16)
Lord Bassam of Brighton | 673 c403 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, with respect, the noble Lord is talking about it, which is the problem.
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 673 c403 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, of course I accept that rebuke from the noble Lord. I specifically said that I did not wan...
Lord Goodhart | 673 c404-6 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts, for returning to the issu...
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 673 c403 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, my quotations are from the US Department of Justice and Mr Hammond, but I accept what the ...
Baroness Scotland of Asthal | 673 c406-7 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I understand that. I hope that we made it plain when we were going through the Bill that o...
Lord Monson | 673 c407 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness for giving way.
Baroness Scotland of Asthal | 673 c406 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the noble Lords, Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts and Lord Goodhart, for entering in...
Lord Goodhart | 673 c406 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I should perhaps have made clear, as I hope I had in my speech, that nothing I have said i...
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 673 c408 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, as ever, I am most grateful to the noble Baroness. Could she   confirm that every country ...
Baroness Scotland of Asthal | 673 c407 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I do not think that I will give way. This is a debate in which two noble Lords have partic...
Baroness Scotland of Asthal | 673 c407-8 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, so it is quite wrong for the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, to say that there is no utility, fr...
Baroness Scotland of Asthal | 673 c408-9 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I do not accept that British citizens are more vulnerable than other citizens. One of the ...
Lord Goodhart | 673 c409 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I apologise for interrupting again. Is the Minister suggesting that an American prosecutor...
Baroness Scotland of Asthal | 673 c409-12 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am not saying that. The noble Lord is trying to establish whether there is any correlati...
Subjects
Conspiracy Fraud Evidence Extradition Parliamentary scrutiny Reciprocal arrangements Treaties Restrictive practices USA Morgan Crucible Price fixing Norris, Ian
Link
View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk