Skip to main content

1-20 of 43 results for subject:"Norwich Union"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
3 February 2009
Reference
HC 98 2008-09
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the comments directed at the Financial Services Authority (FSA) by the Policyholders' Protection Group in regard to its ruling on the distribution of the Norwich Union inherited estates surplus; and whether they will ask the FSA to review its...

Asked by
Baroness Turner of Camden (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 January 2009
Reference
571; 706 c209WA
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
HC 1132 2007-08
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
30 April 2008
Reference
HC 496-ii 2007-08
House
House of Commons
My Lords, I thank the Minister for his reply, but the problem rests with the Financial Services Authority rules. My noble friend may not be aware that in the current negotiations relating to the reattribution of the inherited estate of the Norwich Union, amounting to £3.2 billion, both the policyholders’ advocate and Which? have expressed concern about whether policyholders will get a fair deal under the FSA rules. Although the FSA— My Lords, are not the Government concerned that the effect of these rules will be that much of the 90 per cent of the inherited estate due to policyholders, as set out in the Government’s published policy on inherited estates, will go to shareholders rather than policyholders? Will they put pressure on the FSA to ensure that the government policy of 90 per cent of the inherited estate to policyholders and 10 per cent to shareholders will be followed in reattributions?
Asked by
Lord Joffe (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
22 April 2008
Reference
700 c1382
House
House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
22 April 2008
Reference
HC 496-i 2007-08
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee
Date
28 November 2007
Reference
HC 49-iv 2007-08
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Transport Committee
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
HC 355-i 2006-07
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Notes
See also PAC report HC 113 2006-07
Date
15 November 2006
Reference
HC 33 2006-07
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Mr. Olner. That was observant at this time of the morning. I present the debate with heartfelt sympathy for the Minister, who has been dragged away from his weekly five-a-side football match, in which he excels. Today, he has been given the opportunity to excel in examining a...

Member
Ian Gibson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
450 c349-54WH
House
House of Commons

I echo all the points that the hon. Member for Norwich, North (Dr. Gibson) has made, and I congratulate him on bringing this important debate to Parliament today. The debate is particularly important given that Norwich Union, which is close to the hon. Gentleman’s heart, has shed 4,000 jobs. While...

Member
Baroness Burt of Solihull (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
450 c354-5WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend knows about the importance of the sector to us in Wales, with 30,000 jobs based in the south-east corner of the country. Does my hon. Friend agree that with the inevitable growth of offshoring, a far more robust regulatory regime is needed? The hon. Member for Norwich,...

Member
Mark Williams (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
450 c355WH
House
House of Commons

I start by congratulating the hon. Member for Norwich, North (Dr. Gibson) on securing this debate and on introducing it in his customary style, which is always a delight to listen to. I doubt that any other Member of the House could bring Amicus, Norwich City football club and Chomsky...

Member
Charles Hendry (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
450 c356-60WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend the Member for Ceredigion (Mark Williams) for his informed intervention. The points that he makes are right. Customer satisfaction and local knowledge are important. Returning to the Norwich Union example, the research that the company undertook before outsourcing its jobs discovered that 51...

Member
Baroness Burt of Solihull (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
450 c355-6WH
House
House of Commons

I apologise for arriving late—I was detained on my way here. Does the Minister agree that call centres could and should improve their reputation and acceptability, and that one way of doing so would be for the Government and the industry to encourage more people to sign up to the...

Member
Bob Spink (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
450 c361WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to see you in the Chair, Mr. Olner, and I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Norwich, North (Dr. Gibson) on securing this opportunity to debate the important matter of call centres. I would normally also thank him for the opportunity to address the Chamber,...

Member
Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
450 c360WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman raises a similar point to that made by the hon. Member for Solihull, who suggested that the polarity should be reversed and that people should volunteer to be called, rather than excluding themselves. I shall come to that later, but there is a method through which people...

Member
Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
450 c361-2WH
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister elaborate on why he thinks that offshoring call centre services has worked as well as those services in Britain? How will he protect the data out there? As I said, there is no legislation to stop the flow of information. A server in the United Kingdom may...

Member
Ian Gibson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
450 c362WH
House
House of Commons

On my hon. Friend’s latter point, I mentioned a moment ago that call centre companies are bound by the 1998 Act. The regulator is obliged to monitor and enforce that Act. That is why I mentioned that the Banking Code Standards Board went to India to examine eight Indian call...

Member
Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
450 c362-3WH
House
House of Commons

I know that the Financial Services Authority has done a study in Mumbai and Delhi. Have there, in the Minister’s experience, been any cases of people having been fined for breaches of the 1998 Act?

Member
Ian Gibson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
450 c363WH
House
House of Commons