Skip to main content

1-20 of 75 results for subject:"Saved Sect"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Secretary Shabana Mahmood
Department
Home Office
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
SI 2026/745
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether (a) Ministers, or (b) officials, have had contact with (1) Islam 4UK, (2) Al-Ghurabaa, (3) Al-Muhajiroun, (4) the Saved Sect, and (5) Sunnah wal Jamaah; and, if so, (i) when, and (ii) in what form.

Asked by
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 January 2010
Reference
584; 716 c128WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government on which student campuses (a) Islam4UK, (b) Al-Ghurabaa, (c) Al-Muhajiroun, (d) the Saved Sect, and (e) Sunnah wal Jamaah, are active in the United Kingdom.

Asked by
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 December 2009
Reference
540; 715 c210WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as noble Lords will be relieved to know, I can be relatively brief as the noble Lord, Lord Waddington, has clearly and precisely outlined the ground that I had intended to cover. However, I will make a preliminary point relating to the debate in the other place at...

Member
Lord Russell-Johnston (Liberal Democrat; Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1616-7
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on Terrorism Act 2000 (proscribed organisations) (amendment). Lords debate on motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
Answering member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1610-20
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank the Minister for introducing the order. It is impossible to have a detailed discussion about the merits of proscribing these four groups to assess whether it is right to proscribe them. Of necessity, the Government must work on the accuracy of the intelligence that they...

Member
Baroness Harris of Richmond (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1613-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for explaining the terms of the order. My honourable friend Mr Patrick Mercer, the shadow Minister for Homeland Security, made it clear when this matter was debated in another place last Thursday that we strongly support the making of the order. The police and...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1612-3
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the draft order laid before the House on 17 July be approved [34th Report from the Joint Committee and 42nd Report from the Merits Committee]. The noble Baroness said: My Lords, Section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000 provides a power for the Home Secretary to...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1610-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not attempt to name any of the four organisations, because I am sure I would get them wrong. I say at once that I have no difficulty at all with the third and fourth of the organisations. I have questions about the first two organisations. First,...

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1614-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I follow briefly the noble Baroness, Lady Harris of Richmond, who referred to the PMOI, which was proscribed in 2001 and is one of the bodies listed in Schedule 2 to the Terrorism Act 2000, the list to which four bodies are to be added today. I do...

Member
Lord Waddington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1615-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, none of your Lordships would wish to challenge the fact that it is the duty of Governments to protect their citizens from terrorist activities. I neither challenge that nor wish to say anything about the four organisations listed, because the Secretary of State, his department and his Ministers...

Member
Lord Slynn of Hadley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1617-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have supported this order, in particular the noble Baroness, Lady Anelay, who has given such trenchant support to the orders and the necessity for them. I hope that I will be able to provide comfort to other noble Lords, too. I can...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1618-20
House
House of Lords

Not least for the benefit of others who may go down that route, let me say that the PMOI currently has an application for de-proscription before the Home Secretary. However much people wax lyrical about it, I shall not comment on it. It would not be appropriate to do that....

Member
Tony McNulty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2006
Reference
449 c502-3
House
House of Commons

I take the hon. Gentleman’s point, but in the context of the order, there is clear evidence against TAK, and there is already substantive evidence against the PKK. The other two organisations that we propose to proscribe in an order under the negative procedure are simply successors to the PKK....

Member
Tony McNulty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2006
Reference
449 c494
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. Will the Minister ensure that, when these provisions are reviewed in future, all the organisations that seek to take young men and turn them into terrorists are kept properly under review? Will he also ensure that any organisations that act as generators of extremism and...

Member
Lord Gove (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2006
Reference
449 c506
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Gentleman in one respect—that we must not proscribe organisations simply because another country with which we may be friendly believes that they are undemocratic. However, I have to say that there are clear cases where Kurdish organisations are engaged in terrorist acts, and those are...

Member
David Heath (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2006
Reference
449 c501-2
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend. Arguably, section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2006 could also be used. He is not alone in expressing concern about proscription. The Joint Committee on Human Rights also argued in paragraph 63 of its third report that extending the ground for proscription to cover...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2006
Reference
449 c502
House
House of Commons

I made that point at the time, and it does concern me. In debating such matters, we have to rely a great deal on trust, which is often well placed in Ministers and the advice that they receive from the security services. Nevertheless, we have to decide as a House...

Member
David Heath (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2006
Reference
449 c500-1
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Gentleman, particularly in relation to Kurdish organisations. There has been oppression of Kurdish people by Turkey, Syria and Iraq over many years, and the Governments of those countries perhaps have a very different view of the operations of organisations that we would consider democratic but...

Member
Mike Weir (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2006
Reference
449 c501
House
House of Commons

We are getting a little off the point. The serious issue is how we keep up with the continual name changes of organisations that are effectively the same organisations as those that were proscribed. If they have the same website, address or telephone number, that is relatively easy to follow....

Member
Andrew Dismore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2006
Reference
449 c498-9
House
House of Commons