1-20 of 80 results for subject:"Telephone Preference Service"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.248 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Telephone Preference Service"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Telephone Preference Service" OR subject_ses:83181
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what recent assessment she has made of the effectiveness of (a) the Telephone Preference Service and (b) the powers of the Information Commissioner's Office to make directors liable for the fines imposed on their companies, in the context...
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what recent assessment she has made of the effectiveness of (a) the Telephone Preference Service and (b) the powers of the Information Commissioner's Office to make directors liable for the fines imposed on their companies, in the context...
The Telephone Preference Service (TPS) continues to provide an important free service for people and businesses who wish to opt out of receiving unsolicited live sales and marketing calls. Anyone who wishes to add their landline or mobile number to the TPS database can do so by visiting tpsonline.org.uk. Once a number has been registered, direct marketing organisations are legally required under the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) to refrain from calling it.
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) enforces the law and has powers to fine persons that break it. In 2021/22, the ICO issued over £2.8 million in fines issued to companies responsible for nuisance calls, texts and emails.
The ICO are currently considering responses to their consultation on new regulatory guidance on the use of their enforcement powers under PECR. This includes consideration of the circumstances where it would be appropriate to fine organisations or individual directors; and the factors the ICO would take into account when setting the level of a monetary penalty. The draft guidance can be viewed on the ICO’s website.
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps his Department is taking to prevent nuisance telephone callers making unwanted calls after a telephone number is registered with the Telephone Preference Service.
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps his Department is taking to prevent nuisance telephone callers making unwanted calls after a telephone number is registered with the Telephone Preference Service.
The Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) impose strict obligations on organisations that make direct marketing calls to individuals in the UK. Organisations must not call a number that has been registered on the Telephone Preference Service (TPS) list. For calls relating to pensions and personal injury claims, calls must not be made at all unless the consumer has provided his or her consent.
The Information Commissioner is responsible for enforcing PECR and publishes details of the actions it has taken for breaches of the legislation on its website:
https://ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/nuisance-calls-and-messages/
We are committed to reducing the level of nuisance calls and continue to work with industry and regulators to identify further steps to tackle the problem. For example, we have been working with National Trading Standards to supply call blocking devices to some of the most vulnerable in society.
I beg to move,
That leave be given to bring in a Bill to make provision to prevent unsolicited calls; and for connected purposes.
Lest anyone be in any doubt as to the seriousness and importance of this subject, I should inform the House that well over 100 Members kindly offered to...
I beg to move,
That leave be given to bring in a Bill to make provision to prevent unsolicited calls; and for connected purposes.
Lest anyone be in any doubt as to the seriousness and importance of this subject, I should inform the House that well over 100 Members kindly offered to...
Ten minute rule motion for leave to bring in a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading (Bill 197). To be read a second time on 6 July.
Ten minute rule motion for leave to bring in a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading (Bill 197). To be read a second time on 6 July.
The Government and local bodies together are investing £1.7 billion of public money to support vital improvements in broadband services across the UK. Superfast broadband coverage reached 95% of premises in December 2017 – up from 45% in 2010. Many of the premises reached had exchange only lines.
The Government and local bodies together are investing £1.7 billion of public money to support vital improvements in broadband services across the UK. Superfast broadband coverage reached 95% of premises in December 2017 – up from 45% in 2010. Many of the premises reached had exchange only lines.
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what his Department's policy is on a ban on phone companies charging a fee for services to protect against nuisance calls.
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what his Department's policy is on a ban on phone companies charging a fee for services to protect against nuisance calls.
The Government and local bodies together are investing £1.7 billion of public money to support vital improvements in broadband services across the UK. Superfast broadband coverage reached 95% of premises in December 2017 – up from 45% in 2010. Many of the premises reached had exchange only lines.
For any premises not covered by superfast broadband, as confirmed in our announcement in December 2017, we are pushing ahead with our plans for a Universal Service Obligation (USO) so that by 2020 everyone across the UK will have a clear, enforceable right to request 10 Megabit per second broadband.
Within London the Government expects superfast broadband coverage to be provided by the private sector and is encouraging providers to tackle remaining issues including exchange only lines.
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, whether an estimate been made of the extent to which companies are not complying with regulations on preventing nuisance calls for telephone users who subscribe to the Telephone Preference Service.
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, whether an estimate been made of the extent to which companies are not complying with regulations on preventing nuisance calls for telephone users who subscribe to the Telephone Preference Service.
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) are able to enforce monetary penalties on organisations that make nuisance calls to those registered with the Telephone Preference Service (TPS). DCMS do not hold statistics on the number of companies the ICO have brought enforcement action against for breaches of direct marketing regulations. However, the ICO do publish the action they've taken for breaches of, among other things, the TPS on their website at https://ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what plans he has to review the effectiveness of the Telephone Preference Service.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what plans he has to review the effectiveness of the Telephone Preference Service.
The regulators carried out a review this year. The Office of Communications (Ofcom) and the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) reviewed the effectiveness of the Telephone Preference Service (TPS) and published their findings on 23 July 2014. This showed that TPS registration reduced the volume of live unsolicited marketing calls by about a third and had a wider benefit, as it also reduced other types of nuisance calls by an average of a third.
Consent and lead generation issues can also impact TPS registered consumers. In its report on this subject (published 8 December 2014), the consumer group Which? acknowledged the benefits of the TPS, as a tool for consumers looking to prevent or reduce nuisance calls. Which? also put forward recommendations to the regulators on how to improve the benefits of the TPS and create greater awareness of the service.
Tackling unsolicited marketing nuisance calls remains a priority for DCMS and we published the first ever Nuisance Calls Action Plan on 30 March 2014:https://www.gov.uk/government/news/nuisance-calls-action-plan-unveiled. This set out our achievements to date, work underway and proposed actions for the future, which included both legislative and non-legislative proposals. Taken together these measures will greatly benefit consumers now and in the future.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, if he will take steps to ensure that telephone preference services are able to block international nuisance calls as well as domestic ones.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, if he will take steps to ensure that telephone preference services are able to block international nuisance calls as well as domestic ones.
It is clear from the number of complaints I have received that the Telephone Preference Service is simply not working. I urge the Secretary of State to take whatever action is needed to stop nuisance telephone calls.
It is clear from the number of complaints I have received that the Telephone Preference Service is simply not working. I urge the Secretary of State to take whatever action is needed to stop nuisance telephone calls.
Ofcom ran an inquiry into the Telephone Preference Service, which showed that being a member does significantly reduce the number of nuisance calls received. As my hon. Friend must be aware, we have consulted extensively and changed the law in order to reduce the impact of nuisance calls.
Ofcom ran an inquiry into the Telephone Preference Service, which showed that being a member does significantly reduce the number of nuisance calls received. As my hon. Friend must be aware, we have consulted extensively and changed the law in order to reduce the impact of nuisance calls.
Ofcom ran an inquiry into the Telephone Preference Service, which showed that being a member does significantly reduce the number of nuisance calls received. As my hon. Friend must be aware, we have consulted extensively and changed the law in order to reduce the impact of nuisance calls.
It is clear from the number of complaints I have received that the Telephone Preference Service is simply not working. I urge the Secretary of State to take whatever action is needed to stop nuisance telephone calls.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what plans his Department has to reform the Telephone Preference Service; and what plans his Department has to give better protection and more choice to people who receive nuisance telephone calls.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what plans his Department has to reform the Telephone Preference Service; and what plans his Department has to give better protection and more choice to people who receive nuisance telephone calls.
There are no plans to reform the Telephone Preference Service (TPS) itself, as research published by the Office of Communications (Ofcom) on 23 July 2014 has shown that TPS registration reduces unsolicited marketing calls by a third. Whilst also having the wider benefit of reducing all types of nuisance calls by an average of a third.
Legislative and non-legislative measures were outlined in our Nuisance Calls Action Plan of 30 March: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/nuisance-calls-action-plan-unveiled . The plan includes Ofcom and the communications providers’ progress in enabling calls to be traced, where the calling number is withheld or deliberately disguised, as it is currently difficult for ICO and Ofcom to take action where the calling number is unknown.
Consent and lead generation issues are also being considered by the Taskforce led by Which?, as consent can be unwittingly given to companies, resulting in calls to TPS registered consumers. We look forward to receiving the results from this Taskforce by the end of the year.
We have additionally ensured that Ofcom can now share information with ICO with greater ease, about the conduct of companies who may be breaching the TPS by making unsolicited marketing calls. We are also soon to consult to lower the legal threshold. This will make it easier for ICO to take enforcement action for a breach of the regulations, including the need to ensure compliance with the TPS.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans they have to review the effectiveness of the Telephone Preference Service.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans they have to review the effectiveness of the Telephone Preference Service.
Whilst we have no such plans in place I am pleased to note that Ofcom and the Information Commissioner’s Office published new consumer research on the effectiveness of the Telephone Preference Service (TPS) on 24 July 2014. This independent research showed that registering with the TPS reduced all types nuisance calls, including live sales calls, recorded messages and silent and abandoned calls by around a third. The full Ofcom report can be accessed at: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/telecoms-research/tps-effectiveness/
As noted in our Nuisance Calls Action Plan of March this year we are keen to improve the enforcement of the existing regulations as we believe this will further increase the effectiveness of the TPS.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what recent assessment her Department has made of the effectiveness of the Telephone Preference Service in blocking unwanted cold calls.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what recent assessment her Department has made of the effectiveness of the Telephone Preference Service in blocking unwanted cold calls.
The Telephone Preference Service (TPS) is a free service and more than 19.5 million numbers are currently registered with them. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) considers complaints from consumers and can issue a monetary penalty of up to £500,000. Since January 2012, the ICO has issued four substantive monetary penalties totalling £360,000 in relation to unsolicited marketing calls being made to TPS registered consumers and action against 15 other organisations is also under consideration. In spring 2014, the Office of Communications (Ofcom) and ICO will be reviewing the effectiveness of the TPS in preventing unsolicited direct marketing calls and we will consider Ofcom’s findings to determine whether further action is necessary:
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/silent-calls/joint-action-plan
Also, we will be publishing our action plan on nuisance calls early this year.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the effectiveness of the telephone preference service.[HL4261]
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the effectiveness of the telephone preference service.[HL4261]
The Telephone Preference Service (TPS) is a free service and more than 19.5 million numbers are currently registered with them. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) considers complaints from consumers and can issue a monetary penalty of up to £500,000. Since January 2012, the ICO has issued four substantive monetary penalties totalling £360,000 in relation to unsolicited marketing calls being made to TPS registered consumers and action against fifteen other organisations is also under consideration.
In spring 2014, the Office of Communications (Ofcom) will be reviewing the effectiveness of the TPS in preventing unsolicited direct marketing calls and we will consider Ofcom’s findings to determine whether further action is necessary: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/ silent-calls/joint-action-plan. Also, we will be publishing our action plan on nuisance calls in the new year.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what assessment her Department has made of the effectiveness of the Telephone Preference Service in preventing unwanted calls; and if she will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what assessment her Department has made of the effectiveness of the Telephone Preference Service in preventing unwanted calls; and if she will make a statement.
The Telephone Preference Service (TPS) is a free service and more than 19.5 million numbers are currently registered with the TPS. The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) considers complaints and can issue a monetary penalty of up to £500,000. Since January 2012, the ICO has issued four substantive monetary penalties totalling £360,000 and action against other organisations is also under current consideration. Additionally, in spring 2014 the Office of Communications (Ofcom) will be reviewing the effectiveness of the TPS in preventing unwanted calls and we will consider Ofcom's findings to determine whether further action is necessary:
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/silent-calls/joint-action-plan
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what assessment she has made of the effectiveness of the Telephone Preference Service in preventing unsolicited commercial telephone calls; and if she will make a statement.
[151596]
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what assessment she has made of the effectiveness of the Telephone Preference Service in preventing unsolicited commercial telephone calls; and if she will make a statement.
[151596]
The Telephone Preference Service (TPS) provides protection to consumers from unsolicited marketing calls. The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has enforcement responsibility for the TPS and can issue a monetary penalty of up to £500,000 for the most serious breaches.
I am pressing for more action in this area, with the ICO, Office of Communications (Ofcom) and TPS working together to make improvements. The ICO has increased the resources devoted to enforcement of the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) 2003 and on 18 March 2013 served its first monetary penalty of £90,000 to a company that was making unsolicited marketing calls. The ICO has also published on its website, a list of the most complained about companies that make calls to TPS registered consumers. If the companies fail to remedy their actions, then they could face further enforcement action and ICO is also currently considering issuing penalties to two other companies for breaching the PECR:
http://www.ico.org.uk/enforcement/action/calls
In addition, Ofcom has improved information available to consumers online at:
http://consumers.ofcom.org.uk/tell-us/telecoms/privacy
which provides clearer advice on how to avoid unsolicited calls, texts and e-mails and a new Consumer Guide, signposts the correct place to make a complaint:
http://consumers.ofcom.org.uk/2012/10/tackling-nuisance-calls-and-messages
I welcome this kind of robust action from the ICO and expect them to continue with similar measures against other companies as well.
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship once again, Mr Havard. I thank the Backbench Business Committee for selecting this subject for debate and those Members who supported me in seeking parliamentary time, especially my hon. Friends the Members for Beckenham (Bob Stewart) and for Cleethorpes (Martin Vickers),...
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship once again, Mr Havard. I thank the Backbench Business Committee for selecting this subject for debate and those Members who supported me in seeking parliamentary time, especially my hon. Friends the Members for Beckenham (Bob Stewart) and for Cleethorpes (Martin Vickers),...
My hon. Friend is getting to the nub of the argument. There are regulators responsible for policing such activity, but as with any regulatory breach, regulators have to be fleet of foot in dealing with transgressions, or companies will just carry
on with them. Would my hon. Friend like to...
My hon. Friend is getting to the nub of the argument. There are regulators responsible for policing such activity, but as with any regulatory breach, regulators have to be fleet of foot in dealing with transgressions, or companies will just carry
on with them. Would my hon. Friend like to...