1-20 of 279 results for tabledby:"David Congdon"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.438 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- tabledby:"David Congdon"
- We searched for
- tablingMember_ses:299843
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
(Pursuant to reply at 291 c716W) Statement on light dues.
(Pursuant to reply at 291 c716W) Statement on light dues.
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Young of Cookham
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
21 March 1997
Answered on
21 March 1997
Subjects
Light dues
Date
21 March 1997
Reference
19540; 292 c1003-4W
House
House of Commons
What changes he has made to London Transport's external finance limits for 1996-97. - Includes ref to 275 c130W.
What changes he has made to London Transport's external finance limits for 1996-97. - Includes ref to 275 c130W.
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
John Bowis
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
20 March 1997
Answered on
20 March 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what changed he has made to London Transport's external finance limits for
1996-97. [21638]
Mr. Bowis: The external finance limits for London Transport for 1996-97 has been increased from £939 million to £964 million to
reflect arrangements for paying grant in respect of Croydon tramlink. The external finance limit for crossrail has been formally
reduced from £14 million to 6 million, reflecting my right hon. Friend's answer of 2 April 1996, Official Report, column 130,
about the project.
Subjects
Elizabeth line; External financing limits; London Transport; Tramlink
Date
20 March 1997
Reference
21638; 292 c755W
House
House of Commons
If he has set quality of service objectives for London Underground Ltd. to achieve in 1997-98. - Includes table.
If he has set quality of service objectives for London Underground Ltd. to achieve in 1997-98. - Includes table.
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
John Bowis
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
20 March 1997
Answered on
20 March 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he has set quality of service objectives for London Underground Ltd. to
achieve in 1997-98. [21624]
Mr. Bowis: As is customary at this time of year, I have today written to Peter Ford, the chairman of London Transport, setting
London Underground's quality of service objective for the year ahead. The table shows those objectives, London Underground's
objectives for 1998-99, which were set last year as part of a package of three-year objectives, and its interim targets for this
year and its performance to the beginning of January.
Per cent.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Measure 1996-97 to date 1996-97 target 1997-98 target 1998-99 target
Train service regularity {1}93.0 95.7 95.9 96.2
(percentage headways
achieved)
Percentage schedule operated {2}94.2 96.5 96.9 97.2
Ticket purchase (percentage 96.0 98.0 98.0 98.0
queuing under 3 minutes)
Escalator availability 92.3 92.0 93.0 94.5
Lift availability 96.8 96.0 96.0 96.0
Train service CSR 76.0 76.0 77.0 78.0
Train and station 74.0 73.0 75.0 76.0
information CSR
Customer security and safety 82.0 83.0 83.0 83.0
CSR
Staff helpfulness and 69.0 69.0 70.0 71.0
availability CSR
Train and station 68.0 69.0 69.0 71.0
cleanliness CSR
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
CSR = customer satisfaction rating.
{1} 95.8 per cent. excluding strike days during summer 1996.
{2} 96.4 per cent. excluding strike days.
Performance is to be measured using the mean average of the 13 periods of the year in question.
Subjects
London Underground; Standards
Date
20 March 1997
Reference
21624; 292 c756W;292 c754-6W
House
House of Commons
Statement on the Metropolitan Police Committee's advice on proposed objectives for the Metropolitan Police in 1997-98. - Inc ref to "Metropolitan Police Policing Plan 1997-98" copies to be placed in the Library.
Statement on the Metropolitan Police Committee's advice on proposed objectives for the Metropolitan Police in 1997-98. - Inc ref to "Metropolitan Police Policing Plan 1997-98" copies to be placed in the Library.
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Howard of Lympne
(Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 March 1997
Answered on
19 March 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the Metropolitan Police
Committee's advice on proposed objectives for the Metropolitan police in 1997-98. [21370]
Mr. Howard: Following consultation with the chairman of the Metropolitan Police Committee and the Commissioner, I have approved the
following objectives for the Metropolitan police in 1997-98: (i) To increase the security of the capital against terrorism; (ii) to
solve at least 20 per cent. of burglaries, 15 per cent. of street robberies and at least maintain at the present level detections
for offences of supplying illegal drugs; (iii) to reduce crimes of local concern in identified crime prone areas on every division;
(iv) to improve public reassurance through visible, effective patrolling and problem solving; (v) to improve the briefing, tasking
and debriefing of operational officers; (vi) to equip operational staff with the management information they need to do their jobs;
(vii) to structure our central support services to ensure the best support to operational policing.
These objectives and details of how to address the Government's key objectives for policing are set out in the "Metropolitan Police
Policing Plan 1997-98" which the Commissioner is issuing with my approval. I will be sending copies to all hon. Members whose
constituencies fall wholly or partly within the Metropolitan police district and arranging for copies to be placed in the Library.
Subjects
Crime prevention; Greater London; Police; Metropolitan Police; Standards; Detection rates
Date
19 March 1997
Reference
21370; 292 c595W
House
House of Commons
What are the passenger forecasts for Croydon Tramlink.
What are the passenger forecasts for Croydon Tramlink.
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
John Bowis
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 March 1997
Answered on
19 March 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what are the passenger forecasts for Croydon tramlink. [21049]
Mr. Bowis: This is a commercial matter for Tramtrack Croydon Ltd., the private sector consortium which has won the concession to
build, operate and maintain Croydon tramlink.
Subjects
Passengers; Tramlink
Date
19 March 1997
Reference
21049; 292 c614W
House
House of Commons
What plans he has to replace the current application forms for foreign nationals wishing to apply for leave to remain in the United Kingdom. - Inc ref to application forms in the Library as Dep/3 4884.
What plans he has to replace the current application forms for foreign nationals wishing to apply for leave to remain in the United Kingdom. - Inc ref to application forms in the Library as Dep/3 4884.
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Kirkhope of Harrogate
(Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 March 1997
Answered on
19 March 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans he has to replace the current application forms for
foreign nationals wishing to apply for leave to remain in the United Kingdom. [21371]
Mr. Kirkhope: The current application forms expire on 14 April 1997. Revised versions of the six existing forms have been
prescribed, together with a new form for those applying for an extension of stay or indefinite leave to remain following the refusal
of asylum. These will be valid until 14 April 1998. From today until 14 April 1997 applications may be made on either the newly
prescribed forms or the existing versions. Only the newly prescribed versions may be used for applications made on or after 15 April
1997. The new forms will be available shortly from the application forms unit--0181 760 2233--and copies have been placed in the
Library.
Subjects
Applications; Immigration
Date
19 March 1997
Reference
21371; 292 c598W
House
House of Commons
How many patients were waiting (a) over one year and (b) over 18 months for treatment (i) in each region and (ii) nationally in December 1996; and how many (1) in each equivalent region and (2) nationally were waiting for (a) and (b) in March 1991. - Inc tables.
How many patients were waiting (a) over one year and (b) over 18 months for treatment (i) in each region and (ii) nationally in December 1996; and how many (1) in each equivalent region and (2) nationally were waiting for (a) and (b) in March 1991. - Inc tables.
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Horam
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
18 March 1997
Answered on
18 March 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients were waiting (a) over one year and (b) over 18 months for
treatment (i) in each region and (ii) nationally in December 1996; and how many (1) in each equivalent region and (2) nationally
were waiting for (a) and (b) in March 1991. [20370]
Mr. Horam: The table gives the information requested. Information on the number of patients waiting over 18 months is not available
for 1991. Regions have been adjusted as far as possible to allow comparisons between 1991 and 1996, but some differences remain,
notably due to boundary changes in south Humber, Bedfordshire and Morecambe bay.
Patients waiting over one year at end December 1996 (provisional)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Region Patients waiting over one year Of which: Patients waiting over 18 months
Northern and Yorkshire 2,563 0
Trent 5,277 0
Anglia and Oxford 1,561 22
North Thames 4,007 59
South Thames 2,924 28
South and West 2,507 12
West Midlands 288 0
North West 2,813 2
England 21,940 123
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Patients waiting over one year at end March 1991
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Region Patients waiting over one year
Northern and Yorkshire 17,801
Trent 10,525
Anglia and Oxford 19,713
North Thames 36,593
South Thames 26,265
South and West 24,452
West Midlands 17,473
North West 16,939
England 169,761
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Regions not directly comparable due to boundary changes, notably in south Humberside, Morecambe bay and Bedfordshire.
Subjects
Hospitals; Waiting lists
Date
18 March 1997
Reference
20370; 292 c582W;292 c580W
House
House of Commons
How many (a) GPs and (b) GP practices the Government estimates will become fundholders from April 1997; and what projections he has made for subsequent years. - Inc figs.
How many (a) GPs and (b) GP practices the Government estimates will become fundholders from April 1997; and what projections he has made for subsequent years. - Inc figs.
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
Gerald Malone
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
18 March 1997
Answered on
18 March 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) GPs and (b) GP practices the Government estimate will become
fundholders from April 1997; and what projections he has made for subsequent years. [20371]
Mr. Malone: A total of 1,714 general practitioners in 646 practices will join the fundholding scheme on 1 April this year. This will
give a total of 15,137 GP fundholders in 4,381 practices. This means that 58 per cent. of people in England will have a fundholder
as their GP from this April.
GPs have until 31 July 1997 to apply to join the eighth wave of GP fundholding.
Subjects
GP fundholders; General practitioners
Date
18 March 1997
Reference
20371; 292 c581W;292 c582W
House
House of Commons
When the Bidding Guidance for Round 4 of the Single Regeneration Budget Challenge Fund will be published. - In due course. (Information in Library as Dep/3 4890).
When the Bidding Guidance for Round 4 of the Single Regeneration Budget Challenge Fund will be published. - In due course. (Information in Library as Dep/3 4890).
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
David Curry
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
17 March 1997
Answered on
17 March 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when the bidding guidance for round 4 of the single regeneration
budget challenge fund will be published. [20310]
Mr. Curry: The guidance will be published in due course.
Subjects
Single regeneration budget
Date
17 March 1997
Reference
20310; 292 c445W
House
House of Commons
Statement on publication of his Department's research on mapping local authority estates using the Index of Local Conditions (in Library as Dep/3 4816).
Statement on publication of his Department's research on mapping local authority estates using the Index of Local Conditions (in Library as Dep/3 4816).
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
David Curry
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
12 March 1997
Answered on
12 March 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when he will publish his Department's research on mapping local
authority estates using the index of local conditions. [20304]
Mr. Curry: The report was published today and copies have been placed in the Libraries of the House. The desk research had two
objectives: to explore the relationship between tenure and social and economic deprivation; and to identify and map the most
deprived local authority estates according to the index of local conditions. My Department has commissioned a validation exercise on
the results of the desk exercise.
Subjects
Council housing; Housing estates; Local government; Social conditions
Date
12 March 1997
Reference
20304; 292 c225W
House
House of Commons
When the findings of the evaluation of the Design Improvement Controlled Experiment commissioned from Price Waterhouse will be available. - This is being published today. Copies of the report "The Design Improvement Controlled Experiment (DICE): an Evaluation of the Impact, Costs and Benefits of Estate Re-modelling" in the Library.
When the findings of the evaluation of the Design Improvement Controlled Experiment commissioned from Price Waterhouse will be available. - This is being published today. Copies of the report "The Design Improvement Controlled Experiment (DICE): an Evaluation of the Impact, Costs and Benefits of Estate Re-modelling" in the Library.
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
David Curry
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
10 March 1997
Answered on
10 March 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when the findings of the evaluation of the design improvement
controlled experiment commissioned from Price Waterhouse will be available. [19545]
Mr. Curry: This is being published today. Copies of the report "The Design Improvement Controlled Experiment (DICE): an Evaluation
of the Impact, Costs and Benefits of Estate Re-modelling" have been placed in the Library of the House.
Subjects
Council housing; Design; Housing improvement; Housing estates; Design Improvement Controlled Experiment (DICE)
Date
10 March 1997
Reference
19545; 292 c78W
House
House of Commons
How many of the (a) primary and (b) community health service projects, established with the support of the London Implementation Group, will be financed by health authorities after March 1997.
How many of the (a) primary and (b) community health service projects, established with the support of the London Implementation Group, will be financed by health authorities after March 1997.
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
Gerald Malone
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
10 March 1997
Answered on
10 March 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many of the (a) primary and (b) community health service projects,
established with the support of the London implementation group, will be financed by health authorities after March 1997; and if he
will make a statement. [18702]
Mr. Malone: On the basis of decisions on community health schemes made so far, some 300 schemes worth £64 million will be funded
through London initiative zone funds in 1997-98; some 70 further schemes worth £10.5 million which are currently funded through
London initiative zone funds will be funded directly by health authorities.
In primary care, the Government have made £20 million available in 1997-98 within the London initiative zone to support the third
year of educational initiatives and work force flexibilities for general practitioners.
Subjects
Finance; Health authorities; Primary care; London Implementation Group; Community health services
Date
10 March 1997
Reference
18702; 292 c97-8W
House
House of Commons
What assessment he has made of the long term capital funding requirements of London Underground. -
What assessment he has made of the long term capital funding requirements of London Underground. -
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Young of Cookham
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Transport
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
10 March 1997
Answered on
10 March 1997
Subjects
Privatisation; London Underground
Date
10 March 1997
Reference
292 c10-1; 17760
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Statement on light dues. (Further information at 292 c1003-4W)
Statement on light dues. (Further information at 292 c1003-4W)
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Young of Cookham
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
6 March 1997
Answered on
6 March 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on light dues. [19540]
Sir George Young: I am pleased to announce that light dues for 1997-98 will be reduced by about 4.6 per cent. from 43p to 41p net
ton with consequential reductions to other changes. This reduction, coming after four years of stability, takes rates back to below
those established in 1992. It is a clear demonstration of the increasing efficiency of the three general lighthouse authorities.
I am announcing changes to the light dues regulations which are designed to simplify some aspects of collection and will remove the
liability to pay light dues in certain cases. I shall be consulting the industries concerned on other possible changes in the
distribution of light dues.
Subjects
Light dues
Date
6 March 1997
Reference
19540; 291 c716W
House
House of Commons
To comment on the contribution of the Scottish Grand Committ ee to the accountability of his Department. (Failed OPQ).
To comment on the contribution of the Scottish Grand Committ ee to the accountability of his Department. (Failed OPQ).
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean
(Conservative)
Answering body
Scottish Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
5 March 1997
Answered on
5 March 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement on the contribution of the Scottish Grand
Committee to the accountability of his Department. [17344]
Mr. Forsyth: The Scottish Grand Committee is a powerful Committee of this House. Its enhanced role has ensured closer scrutiny and
accountability of the work of my Department.
Subjects
Scottish Grand Committee
Date
5 March 1997
Reference
17344; 291 c643W
House
House of Commons
Statement on what Government funding is going to be offered in the areas invited by his Department and the Department of Health on 31st October 1996 to develop strategies to tackle rough sleeping. - Includes fact that copies of my Department's letters to each of the areas being offered funding,...
Statement on what Government funding is going to be offered in the areas invited by his Department and the Department of Health on 31st October 1996 to develop strategies to tackle rough sleeping. - Includes fact that copies of my Department's letters to each of the areas being offered funding,...
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
David Curry
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
5 March 1997
Answered on
5 March 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what Government funding is going to be offered in the areas invited
by his Department and the Department of Health on 31 October 1996 to develop strategies to tackle rough sleeping. [19079]
Mr. Curry: The Government's aim is to ensure that there is no necessity for people to sleep rough. On 31 October last year, I
announced that, following detailed evaluations in 23 areas which were co-ordinated by Shelter on contract to the Department of the
Environment, funding would be offered to support expansion of the rough sleepers initiative to the London boroughs of Hammersmith
and Fulham and Kensington and Chelsea, and to Brighton; and that a new rough sleepers revenue fund would be made available to
support local strategies drawn up jointly by local authorities and voluntary sector agencies to tackle rough sleeping in Bath,
Bournemouth, Cambridge, Ealing, Exeter, Leicester, Manchester, Nottingham, Oxford and Richmond upon Thames. I have received and
considered strategies from each of these areas and have reached decisions on the projects which the Government will support. My
Department, in conjunction with the Department of Health, has today written to each of the local authorities explaining these
decisions in detail, and invitations to bid for funding will be issued shortly to voluntary sector organisations and housing
associations identified in the strategies as potential providers of the services that we have agreed to fund. The Department of
Health will be writing separately to local authorities about funding arrangements under the homeless mentally ill initiative.
My announcement on 31 October last year also referred to expansion of the existing central London rough sleepers initiative zones to
encompass the W1 and W2 postal districts of Westminster. My Department is discussing separately with Westminster city council and
local voluntary sector agencies the arrangements for this expansion, which may result in some extra funding for outreach and
resettlement work.
I am pleased that each of the strategies includes existing or new projects provided by statutory and voluntary sector organisations.
This local input is particularly important as a demonstration of the partnership approach that underlies the success of the rough
sleepers initiative. In some areas, Government funding will be subject to clarification of the local authority housing contribution
to the strategy.
This national programme of Government help is being targeted on areas where the most significant rough sleeping problems have been
identified. Local authorities have an obligation to consider the housing needs of everyone residing in their areas, including people
sleeping rough, and to reflect those needs in their general housing strategies. My Department has produced comprehensive guidance to
enable local authorities to conduct detailed evaluations of the extent of rough sleeping in their areas and to develop effective
strategies to tackle any problems that exist. The Government will consider offering funding to support local rough sleeping
strategies in other areas where a major problem is identified.
I am pleased to announce that Ian Brady, deputy chief executive of homelessness charity Centrepoint, will be joining my Department
on secondment to promote the development of local rough sleeping strategies, in liaison with local authorities and other voluntary
sector agencies. This combination of measures is designed to ensure that there is no necessity for anyone to sleep rough in England.
Copies of my Department's letters to each of the areas being offered funding, including summaries of the strategies and the
Government's response, have been placed in the Library.
Subjects
Central government; Greater London; Grants; Homelessness; Local government; Mental illness; Mental health services; Voluntary organisations; Sleeping rough
Date
5 March 1997
Reference
291 c635-6W; 19079
House
House of Commons
If he will comment on the recent report by Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Constabulary on Number 5 Area (South West) of the Metropolitan Police. - Including fact that have today placed in the Library a note of the recommendations from the report together with the responses of the Commissioner...
If he will comment on the recent report by Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Constabulary on Number 5 Area (South West) of the Metropolitan Police. - Including fact that have today placed in the Library a note of the recommendations from the report together with the responses of the Commissioner...
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Blencathra
(Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
26 February 1997
Answered on
26 February 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the recent report by Her Majesty's
chief inspector of constabulary on No. 5 area (south-west) of the Metropolitan police. [17971]
Mr. Maclean: Yes. I have today placed in the Library a note of the recommendations from the report, together with the responses of
the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and the police authority responses, which take into account the advice my right hon.
and learned Friend and I have received from the Metropolitan police committee.
Subjects
Inspections; Police; Metropolitan Police
Date
26 February 1997
Reference
17971; 291 c214W
House
House of Commons
What financial arrangements are being made in respect of NHS trusts dissolved on 1st April 1996.
What financial arrangements are being made in respect of NHS trusts dissolved on 1st April 1996.
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
Stephen Dorrell
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
25 February 1997
Answered on
25 February 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what financial arrangements are being made in respect of NHS trusts dissolved
on 1 April 1996. [17889]
Mr. Dorrell: The national health service trusts dissolved on 1 April 1996 were reconfigured with parts, or all, of other trusts or
directly managed units. I propose to create new originating debt for six new trusts equal to the net assets transferred to them and
to remit the outstanding originating debt of the dissolved trusts.
These operations involve no overall loss to the Exchequer. Her Majesty's Treasury has today presented a minute to the House giving
the particulars and circumstances of the proposed remission which it has approved in principle.
Subjects
Debts; Finance; NHS trusts
Date
25 February 1997
Reference
17889; 291 c180W
House
House of Commons
What proposals there are for future legislation under the Social Chapter; and what assessment he has made of the impact which this legislation would have on businesses in the United Kingdom. (Failed OPQ)
What proposals there are for future legislation under the Social Chapter; and what assessment he has made of the impact which this legislation would have on businesses in the United Kingdom. (Failed OPQ)
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
Richard Page
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 February 1997
Answered on
19 February 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the President of the Board of Trade what proposals there are for future legislation under the social chapter;
and what assessment he has made of the impact which this legislation would have on businesses in the United Kingdom. [15050]
Mr. Page: Issues under discussion include rights for part-time and temporary workers, information and consultation in companies at
national level and the reversal of the burden of proof in sex discrimination cases. The Commission is considering future action in
other areas, including individual dismissals and sick pay. All these measures would be likely to impose damaging, job-destroying
burdens on business if we gave up our opt-out from the social chapter.
Subjects
Social chapter
Date
19 February 1997
Reference
15050; 290 c592-3W
House
House of Commons
What was the number of police officers in London per 10,000 population, by borough using 1991 census data, as at 1st January in each of the last five years. - Includes tables.
What was the number of police officers in London per 10,000 population, by borough using 1991 census data, as at 1st January in each of the last five years. - Includes tables.
Asked by
David Congdon
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Blencathra
(Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 February 1997
Answered on
19 February 1997
Mr. Congdon: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the number of police officers in London per 10,000
population, by borough using 1991 census data, as at 1 January in each of the last five years. [15968]
Mr. Maclean: The information requested is given in the two following tables. Officers based at headquarters and at Heathrow have not
been included.
Table 1: Outer London
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Outer London 1992 1993 1994
Borough and Division Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of
population officers population officers population officers
per 10,000 per 10,000 per 10,000
population population population
Barking and Dagenham
Barking and Dagenham 279 143,681 19.42 286 143,681 19.91 287 143,681 19.97
Barnet
Barnet{1} 753 293,564 25.65 759.3 293,564 25.86 780.6 293,564 26.59
Golders Green
West Hendon
Bexley
Bexleyheath 285 215,615 13.22 277.5 215,615 12.287 273 215,615 12.66
Brent
Wembley 660 243,025 27.16 623.91 243,025 25.67 620.1 243,025 25.52
Kilburn
Bromley
Bromley 523 290,609 18.00 473.44 290,609 16.29 480.58 290,609 16.54
Orpington
Croydon
Croydon 626 313,510 19.97 597.6 313,510 19.06 579.69 313,510 18.49
South Norwood
Ealing
Ealing 604 275,257 21.94 620.28 275,257 22.53 653.01 275,257 23.72
Southall
Enfield
Edmonton 527 257,417 20.47 532 257,417 20.67 549.46 257,417 21.35
Enfield{1}
Greenwich
Greenwich 569 207,650 27.40 545 207,650 26.25 517.8 207,650 24.94
Plumstead
Outer London 1995 1996 1997
Borough and Division Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of
population officers population officers population officers
per 10,000 per 10,000 per 10,000
population population population
Barking and Dagenham
Barking and Dagenham 304.6 143,681 21.20 303.2 143,681 21.10 299.85 143,681 20.87
Barnet
Barnet{1} 790.85 293,564 26.94 752.55 293,564 25.63 736.06 293,564 25.07
Golders Green
West Hendon
Bexley
Bexleyheath 285 215,615 13.22 295.5 215,615 13.70 287.3 215,615 13.32
Brent
Wembley 651.98 243,025 26.83 617.74 243,025 25.42 639.86 243,025 26.33
Kilburn
Bromley
Bromley 500.43 290,609 17.22 490.44 290,609 16.88 471.44 290,609 16.22
Orpington
Croydon
Croydon 623.8 313,510 19.90 633.88 313,510 20.22 625.34 313,510 19.95
South Norwood
Ealing
Ealing 643.86 275,257 23.39 660.64 275,257 24.00 645.47 275,257 23.45
Southall
Enfield
Edmonton 543.6 257,417 21.12 545.48 257,417 21.19 553.88 257,417 21.52
Enfield{1}
Greenwich
Greenwich 573.2 207,650 27.60 623.31 207,650 30.02 622.85 207,650 30.00
Plumstead
Outer London 1992 1993 1994
Borough and Division Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of
population officers population officers population officers
per 10,000 per 10,000 per 10,000
population population population
Harrow
Harrow 288 200,100 14.39 272.2 200,100 13.60 277.2 200,100 13.85
Havering
Romford 369 229,492 16.08 366 229,492 15.95 375.01 229,492 16.34
Hillingdon
Hillingdon 467 231,602 20.16 453.9 231,602 19.60 443.98 231,602 19.17
Hounslow
Chiswick 474 204,397 23.19 451.4 204,397 22.08 482.9 204,397 23.63
Hounslow
Kingston
Kingston{1} 403 132,996 30.30 375.4 132,996 28.23 395.7 132,996 29.75
Merton
Wimbledon 313 168,470 18.58 291.4 168,470 17.30 312 168,470 18.52
Redbridge
Ilford 555 226,218 24.53 520 226,218 22.99 536.4 226,218 23.71
Barkingside{1}
Richmond
Richmond 333 160,732 20.72 298 160,732 18.54 321.35 160,732 19.99
Sutton
Sutton{1} 402 168,880 23.80 373.9 168,880 22.14 390 168,880 23.09
Spelthorne
Spelthorne 203 89,987 22.56 189.4 89,987 21.05 208.2 89,987 23.14
Waltham Forest
Chingford 472 212,033 22.26 461.8 212,033 21.78 473.8 212,033 22.35
Leyton
Outer London 1995 1996 1997
Borough and Division Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of
population officers population officers population officers
per 10,000 per 10,000 per 10,000
population population population
Harrow
Harrow 272.2 200,100 13.60 293.8 200,100 14.68 283.4 200,100 14.6
Havering
Romford 377.17 229,492 16.43 363.49 229,492 15.84 351.05 229,492 15.30
Hillingdon
Hillingdon 439.5 231,602 18.98 437 231,602 18.87 418.7 231,602 18.08
Hounslow
Chiswick 466.3 204,397 22.81 484.2 204,397 23.69 470 204,397 22.99
Hounslow
Kingston
Kingston{1} 373.14 132,996 28.06 393.34 132,996 29.58 362.24 132,996 27.24
Merton
Wimbledon 354.45 168,470 21.04 334.85 168,470 19.88 325.25 168,470 19.31
Redbridge
Ilford 553.89 226,218 24.48 545.1 226,218 24.10 552 226,218 24.40
Barkingside{1}
Richmond
Richmond 297.45 160,732 18.51 319.85 160,732 19.90 295.85 160,732 18.41
Sutton
Sutton{1} 428.9 168,880 25.40 431.38 168,880 25.54 405.23 168,880 24.00
Spelthorne
Spelthorne 199.2 89,987 22.14 199.8 89,987 22.20 198.2 89,987 22.03
Waltham Forest
Chingford 487.2 212,033 22.98 463.3 212,033 21.85 477.22 212,033 22.51
Leyton
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Note:
{1} Officer strength shown for these divisions includes provision for policing parts of the borough situated in the counties of
Hertfordshire, Surrey or Essex.
Table 2: Inner London
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Inner London 1992 1993 1994
Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of
population officers population officers population officers
per 10,000 per 10,000 per 10,000
population population population
Camden
Hampstead 749 170,444 43.94 721.7 170,444 42.34 691.7 170,444 40.58
Kentish Town
Holborn
Hackney
Shoreditch 651 181,248 35.92 611 181,248 33.71 633 181,248 34.92
Stoke Newington
Hammersmith and Fulham
Hammersmith 536 148,502 36.09 541 148,502 36.43 548,33 148,502 36.92
Fulham
Haringey
Hornsey 577 202,204 28.54 561.6 202,204 27.77 561.6 202,204 27.77
Tottenham
Islington
Holloway 599 164,686 36.37 547 164,686 33.21 568.1 164,686 34.50
Islington
Kensington and Chelsea
Brompton 670 138,394 48.41 632 138,394 45.67 655.1 138,394 47.34
Notting Hill
Lambeth
Brixton 988 244,834 40.35 980.5 244,834 40.05 947.4 244,834 38.70
Streatham
Vauxhall
Lewisham
Catford 598 230,983 25.89 593.6 230,983 25.70 588.4 230.983 25.47
Lewisham
Newham
Forest Gate 595 212,170 28.04 570 212,170 26.87 577.48 212,170 27.22
Plaistow
Inner London 1995 1996 1997
Borough and Division Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of
population officers population officers population officers
per 10,000 per 10,000 per 10,000
population population population
Camden
Hampstead 703.9 170,444 41.30 698.76 170,444 41.00 681.95 170,444 40.41
Kentish Town
Holborn
Hackney
Shoreditch 693.18 181,248 38.24 659.54 181,248 36.39 676.04 181,248 37.30
Stoke Newington
Hammersmith and Fulham
Hammersmith 545.2 148,502 36.71 533.13 148,502 35.90 561.25 148,502 37.79
Fulham
Haringey
Hornsey 579.95 202,204 28.68 544.6 202,204 26.93 535 202,204 26.46
Tottenham
Islington
Holloway 567.9 164,686 34.48 562 164,686 34.13 569.6 164,686 34.59
Islington
Kensington and Chelsea
Brompton 616.83 138,394 44.57 604.4 138,394 43.67 642.4 138,394 46.42
Notting Hill
Lambeth
Brixton 1,003.05 244,834 40.97 969.81 244,834 39.61 967.3 244,834 39.51
Streatham
Vauxhall
Lewisham
Catford 598.3 230,983 25.90 642.6 230,983 27.82 626.3 230,983 27.11
Lewisham
Newham
Forest Gate 623.08 212,170 29.37 626.68 212,170 29.54 625.88 212,170 29.50
Plaistow
Inner London 1992 1993 1994
Borough and Division Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of
population officers population officers population officers
per 10,000 per 10,000 per 10,000
population population population
Southwark
Southwark 886 218,541 40.54 816.65 218,541 37.37 849.78 218,541 38.88
Peckham
Walworth
Tower Hamlets
Whitechapel 722 161,064 44.83 669 161,064 41.54 690 161,064 42.84
Limehouse
Wandsworth
Battersea 719 252,425 28.48 671.6 252,425 26.61 693.3 252,425 27.47
Wandsworth
Westminster
Belgravia 1881 174,814 107.60 1905.85 174,814 109.02 1901.2 174,814 108.76
West End Central
Charing Cross
Marylebone
Paddington
Total 19,276.00 6,765,544 28.49 18,589.93 6,765,544 27.48 18,863.17 6,765,544 27.88
Inner London 1995 1996 1997
Borough and Division Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of Strength Census Number of
Population officers Population officers Population officers
per 10,000 per 10,000 per 10,000
population population population
Southwark
Southwark 871.47 218,541 39.88 902.86 218,541 41.31 878.16 218,541 40.18
Peckham
Walworth
Tower Hamlets
Whitechapel 633.7 161,064 39.34 613.7 161,064 38.10 596.4 161,064 37.03
Limehouse
Wandsworth
Battersea 647.78 252,425 25.66 638.18 252,425 25.28 662.28 252,425 26.24
Wandsworth
Westminster
Belgravia 1799.55 174,814 102.94 1714.55 174,814 98.08 1700.66 174,814 97.28
West End Central
Charring Cross
Marylebone
Paddington
Total 19,050.61 6,765,544 28.16 18,899.66 6,765,544 27.94 18744.31 6,765,544 27.71
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Subjects
Greater London; Police; Metropolitan Police
Date
19 February 1997
Reference
15968; 290 c550-8W
House
House of Commons