1-20 of 674 results for tabledby:"Jerome Mayhew"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.531 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- tabledby:"Jerome Mayhew"
- We searched for
- tablingMember_ses:464968
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what information her Department holds on how many passenger services operated by each train operating company were affected by defective passenger doors in each month since July 2024.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what information her Department holds on how many passenger services operated by each train operating company were affected by defective passenger doors in each month since July 2024.
The Department does not hold a centrally collated dataset showing how many passenger services operated by each train operating company were affected by defective passenger doors in each month since July 2024. Information on rolling stock defects, including door-related faults, data are recorded and managed by Network Rail and train operators.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, which train operating company had the highest proportion of passenger services that were (a) cancelled because of rolling stock failures and (b) operated with fewer carriages than planned in the latest 12-month period for which data is available.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, which train operating company had the highest proportion of passenger services that were (a) cancelled because of rolling stock failures and (b) operated with fewer carriages than planned in the latest 12-month period for which data is available.
The Department does not hold data on the number of services cancelled because of rolling stock failures. The Department does hold information on short formations. However, the data is recorded differently across operators and is not sufficiently comparable to enable a robust assessment of which operator had the highest proportion of services operated with fewer carriages than planned. The Department expects train operators to provide appropriate capacity to meet anticipated passenger demand, including through the effective deployment and maintenance of rolling stock.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 10 July 2026 to Question 15380 on South Eastern Main Line: Mobile Broadband, what the names and locations are of the (a) 57 railway tunnels and (b) 12 Network Rail-managed stations included in the current phase of...
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 10 July 2026 to Question 15380 on South Eastern Main Line: Mobile Broadband, what the names and locations are of the (a) 57 railway tunnels and (b) 12 Network Rail-managed stations included in the current phase of...
The 12 Network Rail-managed stations included in the current phase of Project Reach are Birmingham New Street, Bristol Temple Meads, Edinburgh Waverley, Glasgow Central, Leeds, Liverpool Lime Street, London Euston, London King’s Cross, London Liverpool Street, London Paddington, London Waterloo and Manchester Piccadilly.
The locations of the 57 tunnels included in the programme are located on the East Coast, West Coast, Great Western, Thameslink, Kent, North West and Wales.
The full list of tunnels is as follows –
| Tunnel |
1 | Ardsley Tunnel |
2 | Potters Bar East Tunnel |
3 | Potters Bar West Tunnel |
4 | Wood Green Centre Tunnel |
5 | Wood Green East Tunnel |
6 | Wood Green West Tunnel |
7 | Barnet West Tunnel |
8 | Barnet East Tunnel |
9 | Barnet Centre Tunnel |
10 | Hadley Wood South East Tunnel |
11 | Hadley Wood South West Tunnel |
12 | Beechwood Tunnel |
13 | Polperro Tunnel |
14 | Buckshead Tunnel |
15 | Farnworth Tunnel (Up Line) |
16 | Farnworth Tunnel (Down Line) |
17 | Clerkenwell No. 1 Tunnel |
18 | Copenhagen Centre Tunnel |
19 | Copenhagen West Tunnel |
20 | Gasworks Centre Tunnel |
21 | Gasworks West Tunnel |
22 | Ludgate Tunnel |
23 | Harecastle New Tunnel |
24 | Primrose Hill Slow Lines Tunnel |
25 | Primrose Hill Fast Lines Tunnel |
26 | Kensal Green Fast Lines Tunnel |
27 | Kensal Green Slow Lines Tunnel |
28 | Kilsby Tunnel |
29 | Stowe Hill Tunnel |
30 | Linslade Up Slow Tunnel |
31 | Linslade Centre Bore (Up Fast / Down Slow) |
32 | Linslade Down Fast Tunnel |
33 | Macclesfield Tunnel |
34 | Prestbury Tunnel |
35 | Marley Tunnel |
36 | Monument Lane Tunnel |
37 | New Street North Western Lines Tunnel |
38 | New Street Midland Lines Tunnel |
39 | Newport New Tunnel |
40 | Newport Old Tunnel |
41 | Northchurch Fast Line Tunnel |
42 | Northchurch Up Slow Tunnel |
43 | Northchurch Down Slow Tunnel |
44 | Parsons Tunnel |
45 | Patchway Up New Tunnel |
46 | Shugborough Tunnel |
47 | Sodbury Tunnel |
48 | Alderton Tunnel |
49 | Peascliffe Tunnel |
50 | Stoke Tunnel |
51 | Treverin Tunnel |
52 | Watford Tunnel Slow Lines |
53 | Watford Tunnel Fast Lines |
54 | Welwyn North Tunnel |
55 | Welwyn South Tunnel |
56 | Whiteball Tunnel |
57 | Wiveliscombe Tunnel |
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many passenger services were cancelled due to rolling stock failure by each train operating company in each month since July 2024.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many passenger services were cancelled due to rolling stock failure by each train operating company in each month since July 2024.
The Department expects train operators to provide appropriate capacity to meet anticipated passenger demand, including through the effective deployment and maintenance of rolling stock. While the Department does not hold data on rolling stock availability, or the number of services cancelled because of rolling stock failure, it does hold information on short formations. However, this data is recorded differently across operators, and is not sufficiently comparable to enable a robust assessment of which operator had the highest proportion of services operated with fewer carriages than planned.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what information his Department holds on the number of people who were employed in the automotive manufacturing sector in each month since May 2026 up to and including the most recent month for which figures are available.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what information his Department holds on the number of people who were employed in the automotive manufacturing sector in each month since May 2026 up to and including the most recent month for which figures are available.
The information requested falls under the remit of the UK Statistics Authority.
A response to the Parliamentary Question of 7th July is attached.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, when she expects the outline planning application for the redevelopment of Euston to be submitted.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, when she expects the outline planning application for the redevelopment of Euston to be submitted.
We are working with our Master Development Partner Lendlease on a Masterplan and outline planning application to deliver high-quality mixed-use development around the new HS2 Station and renewed Network Rail station. Lendlease is aiming to submit a planning application in 2027.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what the estimated annual operating cost of the Euston Delivery Company will be once established as a public body.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what the estimated annual operating cost of the Euston Delivery Company will be once established as a public body.
Currently the Euston Delivery Company sits as a business unit within the Department for Transport as its capability is built. We expect EDC to be stood up as a public body in the Autumn, and its administrative operating budget will be confirmed at that point.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how much each arm's length body sponsored by her Department has spent on (a) in-house external affairs or public affairs functions and (b) external public affairs or lobbying consultants since 4 July 2024.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how much each arm's length body sponsored by her Department has spent on (a) in-house external affairs or public affairs functions and (b) external public affairs or lobbying consultants since 4 July 2024.
The table below shows how much each arm’s length body (ALB) sponsored by the Department for Transport has spent on (a) in-house external affairs or public affairs functions and (b) external public affairs or lobbying consultants since 4 July 2024. The figures relate to engagement with political stakeholders unless it has not been possible to disaggregate from wider spend. In relation to part (b) of the question, DfT ALBs have not spent money on lobbying consultants.
ALB | How much ALB has spent on (a) in-house external affairs or public affairs functions since July 2024 | How much ALB has spent on (b) external public affairs or lobbying consultants since July 2024 |
Active Travel England
| N/a – it has not been possible to disaggregate engagement with political stakeholders from wider spend | N/a – it has not been possible to disaggregate engagement with political stakeholders from wider spend |
Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency | £0 | £0 |
Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency | £0 | £0 |
Maritime Coastguard Agency | £0 | £0 |
Vehicle Certification Agency | £0 | £0 |
British Transport Police Authority | £0 | £0 |
Traffic Commissioners for Great Britain | £0 | £0 |
National Highways | N/a – it has not been possible to disaggregate engagement with political stakeholders from wider spend | N/a – it has not been possible to disaggregate engagement with political stakeholders from wider spend |
Network Rail | £325,174 | £600,580 |
| ||
East West Rail Company Ltd
| N/a – it has not been possible to disaggregate engagement with political stakeholders from wider spend | N/a – it has not been possible to disaggregate engagement with political stakeholders from wider spend |
HS2 | N/a – it has not been possible to disaggregate engagement with political stakeholders from wider spend | N/a – it has not been possible to disaggregate engagement with political stakeholders from wider spend |
Northern Lighthouse Board | £0 | £0 |
Transport Focus | N/a – it has not been possible to disaggregate engagement with political stakeholders from wider spend | N/a – it has not been possible to disaggregate engagement with political stakeholders from wider spend |
Trinity House | £0 | £0 |
Office of Rail and Road | £223,635 | £15,940 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the Euston Masterplan will set out the anticipated number of (a) homes and (b) affordable homes to be delivered.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the Euston Masterplan will set out the anticipated number of (a) homes and (b) affordable homes to be delivered.
We are working at pace with our Master Development Partner, Lendlease, on a Masterplan for Euston, with an emphasis on growth and delivering much needed housing. The number of homes and affordable homes is subject to the development of the Masterplan.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department has considered introducing powers for the courts to impose an interim driving disqualification on individuals charged with specified drug driving offences pending the outcome of criminal proceedings.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department has considered introducing powers for the courts to impose an interim driving disqualification on individuals charged with specified drug driving offences pending the outcome of criminal proceedings.
The Department has recently consulted on possible reforms to strengthen enforcement against drink and drug driving, including temporary licence suspension-type measures for suspected offenders before a case is concluded. The consultation has now closed and responses are being analysed.
Existing legislation already provides for courts to impose disqualification in appropriate cases, including as part of sentence. It also provides for interim disqualification in specified circumstances after conviction where an offence involving obligatory or discretionary disqualification has not yet been finally dealt with. Sentencing and disqualification decisions in individual cases are matters for the independent courts.
For drug-driving offences, the current evidential framework relies on blood analysis for specified-limit offences. The Department has also consulted on possible future changes to drink and drug-driving enforcement and has supported exploratory work on roadside evidential drug-testing capability, including the Mobile Evidential Drug Testing Instrument (MEDTI) Demonstrator. Any change to evidential testing arrangements would require further scientific, legal and operational consideration.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department is assessing the potential use of Home Office-approved roadside evidential drug testing devices to replace laboratory analysis for specified drug driving offences.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department is assessing the potential use of Home Office-approved roadside evidential drug testing devices to replace laboratory analysis for specified drug driving offences.
The Department has recently consulted on possible reforms to strengthen enforcement against drink and drug driving, including temporary licence suspension-type measures for suspected offenders before a case is concluded. The consultation has now closed and responses are being analysed.
Existing legislation already provides for courts to impose disqualification in appropriate cases, including as part of sentence. It also provides for interim disqualification in specified circumstances after conviction where an offence involving obligatory or discretionary disqualification has not yet been finally dealt with. Sentencing and disqualification decisions in individual cases are matters for the independent courts.
For drug-driving offences, the current evidential framework relies on blood analysis for specified-limit offences. The Department has also consulted on possible future changes to drink and drug-driving enforcement and has supported exploratory work on roadside evidential drug-testing capability, including the Mobile Evidential Drug Testing Instrument (MEDTI) Demonstrator. Any change to evidential testing arrangements would require further scientific, legal and operational consideration.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether Network Rail project account records, include additional expenditure arising from delays or rescheduling of vegetation management works following the identification of protected species.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether Network Rail project account records, include additional expenditure arising from delays or rescheduling of vegetation management works following the identification of protected species.
Since Network Rail does not record the reasons for rescheduling vegetation work, it is not possible to provide a figure for what additional expenditure may be incurred as a result of rescheduling due to protected species.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 22 June 2026 to Question 10915 on Euston Station: Finance, how many of the organisations that participated in preliminary market engagement indicated that they were interested in participating in a future procurement process relating to private finance...
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 22 June 2026 to Question 10915 on Euston Station: Finance, how many of the organisations that participated in preliminary market engagement indicated that they were interested in participating in a future procurement process relating to private finance...
Almost 50 organisations responded to the Department’s market engagement questionnaire, including contractors, equity investors, lenders and other interested parties. The Department held a series of one-to-one and roundtable discussions with delivery capable organisations as part of the market engagement exercise.
This engagement demonstrated strong market interest in the Department’s private finance proposals. However, given the commercially sensitive nature of the information, the Department is unable to disclose how many respondents indicated that they may wish to participate in any future procurement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 6 July 2026 to Question 14121 on Electric Vehicles: Manufacturing Industries, what assessment her Department has made of the impact on investor confidence of announcing a review of the Zero Emission Vehicle Mandate before its conclusion.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 6 July 2026 to Question 14121 on Electric Vehicles: Manufacturing Industries, what assessment her Department has made of the impact on investor confidence of announcing a review of the Zero Emission Vehicle Mandate before its conclusion.
The Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Mandate was designed to be kept under continual review to ensure it remains fit for purpose. The Government has a long-standing commitment to publish a review of the ZEV Mandate in early 2027. This was set out in the Government response to the ZEV Mandate Consultation in October 2023. We intend to conclude the review, which will include a public consultation, in the next six months.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 1 July 2026 to Question 12032, whether the public interest assessment was made on a case-by-case basis or as a general policy in respect of all flights funded for non-UK nationals.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 1 July 2026 to Question 12032, whether the public interest assessment was made on a case-by-case basis or as a general policy in respect of all flights funded for non-UK nationals.
The Department does not routinely comment on national security matters. A case-by-case assessment was made of each flight to ascertain that it was for national security-related activity.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many British Transport Police officers were assigned to policing major rail interchange stations in each of the last five years; and if she will list the stations included in those figures.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many British Transport Police officers were assigned to policing major rail interchange stations in each of the last five years; and if she will list the stations included in those figures.
British Transport Police have reported the following average full time equivalent number of police officers assigned to major rail interchange stations in each year:
2022/23: 689.8
2023/24: 743.3
2024/25: 661.8
2025/26: 623.3
2026/27: 646.3
The stations included are:
- Birmingham New Street
- Bristol Temple Meads
- Edinburgh Waverley
- Glasgow Central
- Guildford
- Leeds City
- Liverpool Lime Street
- Manchester Piccadilly
- Reading
- London Bridge
- London Cannon Street
- London Charing Cross
- Clapham Junction
- London Euston
- London King’s Cross
- London Liverpool Street
- London Paddington
- London St Pancras International
- London Victoria
- London Waterloo
The increase in average full-time officers at major rail interchange stations to 743.3 in 2023/24 was due to officers being moved to alternative BTP locations, including offices at railway stations, whilst the BTP's London headquarters was relocated.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what estimate her Department has made of the number of passengers delayed as a result of rail trespass incidents in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what estimate her Department has made of the number of passengers delayed as a result of rail trespass incidents in each of the last five years.
There were 65,540 trespass incidents recorded by the British Transport Police in the last five years (2021/22 to 2025/26); we do not have an assessment of the number of passengers delayed by these incidents.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 6 July 2026 to Question 15007 on Network Rail: Biodiversity, what guidance Network Rail has issued to its own staff on managing the impact of seasonal ecological survey windows and protected species licensing requirements on project delivery.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 6 July 2026 to Question 15007 on Network Rail: Biodiversity, what guidance Network Rail has issued to its own staff on managing the impact of seasonal ecological survey windows and protected species licensing requirements on project delivery.
Through Network Rail’s standards and guidance, along with the knowledge of its environmental experts, Network Rail outlines that there are strict legal requirements when managing land near to protected sites or species. Works planning and good communication with environmental regulators can support work carried out without the need for licences. Awareness of the presence of protected sites and species also means work can be scheduled to avoid fines and delays.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the Answer of 14 April 2026 to Question 124216, whether the final modifications have been delivered and tested on the trains that will be used on East West Rail from West Midlands Trains.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the Answer of 14 April 2026 to Question 124216, whether the final modifications have been delivered and tested on the trains that will be used on East West Rail from West Midlands Trains.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will take urgent steps to respond to Professor Hughes’ deadline for the Government to commit to a compensation scheme for women harmed by pelvic mesh and sodium valproate.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will take urgent steps to respond to Professor Hughes’ deadline for the Government to commit to a compensation scheme for women harmed by pelvic mesh and sodium valproate.