Skip to main content

Oral answer to question provided on Thursday, 3 November 2005 in the House of Commons, by Malcolm Wicks (Labour), Department of Trade and Industry.


Pre-payment Meters

Answer

It's a funny old week, isn't it? Clearly, pre-payment meters involve capital expenditure. If there was no price differential, other customers, including many low-income people and many pensioners, would have to subsidise those on pre-payment meters. These are difficult issues. I am not relaxed about the fact that so many low-income families have different payment methods from the mainstream of society. I repeat that there is no easy solution, but I have told the hon. Member for Angus (Mr. Weir) that I will reconsider the issue.

This is an answer to the Oral question asked on Thursday, 3 November 2005 by Brian Jenkins (Labour).

Question
That is the point. For a long time my hon. Friend was missing the point of the question. He talked about the market, but not about discrimination by companies against people who opt for pre-payment meters. On several occasions, Members on the Front Bench have defended the marketplace, and the openness of the marketplace, while Opposition Front Benchers and the previous speaker, the hon. Member for Angus (Mr. Weir), call for more Government intervention and control. On what date did we switch places?

Secondary information

Type
Oral answer to question
Reference
438 c962 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Billing Electricity Natural gas Meters Utilities Pre-payment
Link
View this Oral answer to question on www.publications.parliament.uk