Written question asked by Adrian Sanders (Liberal Democrat) on Monday, 9 July 2001, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 16 July 2001. It was answered by Sally Keeble (Labour) on Monday, 16 July 2001 on behalf of the Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions.
Dept for Transport Local Government and the Regions
- Question
- To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, if he will publish the criteria under the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 governing the use by local authorities of housing investment programme allocations for social services staff redundancy packages; and if he will make a statement. - Inc figures.
- Answer
-
Mr. Sanders: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions if he will publish the criteria under the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 governing the use by local authorities of housing investment programme allocations for social services staff redundancy packages; and if he will make a statement. [3534] Ms Keeble: Housing investment programme allocations, together with those for a number of other capital programmes, are issued in the form of Basic Credit Approvals. Authorities are free to use these for any capital purpose. Expenditure for capital purposes is defined in the 1989 Act, but the Act also provides, in section 40(6), for the Secretary of State to make a direction that expenditure normally defined as revenue be treated by the authority concerned as expenditure for capital purposes. Directions are not normally issued unless the expenditure: (a) is substantial in relation to the authority's revenue budget for the financial year concerned and was unforeseeable when that budget was adopted; or (b) cannot be met out of financial reserves but will result in revenue account savings in future years. Applications for capitalisation of redundancy costs, and similar lump-sum costs such as severance or premature retirement payments, are normally considered against test (b) as stated. In those cases, directions are not usually given unless the expenditure to be capitalised exceeds both: 5 per cent. of the authority's available reserves (excluding Local Management of Schools (LMS) reserves) and 0.25 per cent. of its total budgeted expenditure for the financial year in question. It is therefore possible, due to the flexibility allowed to authorities in the use of BCAs, and following issue of a section 40(6) direction, for housing capital allocations to be used to fund redundancy costs. But this would only be in an exceptional case and the authority in question would still be expected to meet longer term targets for housing improvement.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 3534; 372 c10-1W
- Session
- 2001-02
- Subjects
- Capital investment Housing Finance Local government Staff Redundancy Subsidies Housing investment programme
- Legislation
- Local Government and Housing Act 1989
- Contains statistics
- Yes
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2017-01-17 16:01:28 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_666674
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_666674
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_666674