Proceeding contribution from Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 9 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Consumer Credit Bill.
Consumer Credit Bill
In anticipation of other challenges on that issue, hon. Members will know of the Pepper v. Hart judgment, whereby should Ministers try to give indications of constraints on certain issues when speaking at the Dispatch Box, their comments can be used by the courts and by others to stifle debate. I do not want to do that. As I have said, the unfairness test is not a new concept for the industry. The contributions that Members will make in Committee will give us an opportunity to develop wider parameters that will be very clear when it comes to court cases. However, if we are too restrictive at this stage, there may be loopholes.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 434 c1411
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Consumers Appeals Debts Cheques Credit agreements Credit Credit cards Licensing Instalment credit Interest rates Low incomes Powers of entry Protection Loans Office of Fair Trading Money lenders Regulation Unfair practices Personal loans Financial Ombudsman Service Mediation
- Legislation
- Consumer Credit Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 17:56:02 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_250777
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_250777
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_250777