Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanningfield (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 27 June 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].


Road Safety Bill [HL]

I thank the Minister for that reply. As I have said two or three times, this is a probing amendment to try to get some idea of the Government’s thinking. I do not envy the Government in trying to resolve the issue as many different views are held on it. I was pleased to hear the Minister say that much consultation will be undertaken. It is important to consult road users, safety interests, the police and everyone else before a final conclusion is reached. I was also pleased to hear the Minister say that there will be further debate on the issue here as obviously the ultimate reasoning regarding what constitutes two or six points is very much in the public’s mind. However, I hear what the Minister said. We shall debate the issues further. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 16 to 20 not moved.] Clause 3 agreed to. Clause 4 [Giving of fixed penalty notices by vehicle examiners]: On Question, Whether Clause 4 shall stand part of the Bill?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c50-1 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Disadvantaged Accidents Inspections Fixed penalties Large goods vehicles Motor vehicles Police Pedestrians Safety Roads Speed limits Road traffic offences Safety belts Vehicle and Operator Services Agency Driving licences
Legislation
Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk