Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Criminal Defence Service Bill [HL].


Criminal Defence Service Bill [HL]

In turn, I will go back and look at the 2003 order, which drew my attention to one of the schedules. I am in some difficulty in establishing why this should be a difficult matter for the Government in the light of the position they took at the end of the Constitutional Reform Bill process. I respectfully agree with the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, that, irrespective of whether the Lord Chancellor remains in the House, it is highly likely that the role of Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and the role of Lord Chancellor will be in the purview of one person. So, in a sense, given the fact that the Lord Chancellor is stipulated as continuing to take a lead on these matters, it seems that it would cause no political pain and much constitutional pleasure if the Lord Chancellor retained responsibility for legal aid. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 2 not moved.]


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c5GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Criminal proceedings Appeals Applications Criminal Defence Service Crown Court Finance Legal aid scheme Eligibility Legal representation Legal Services Commission Legal costs Legal opinion Magistrates' courts Means-tested benefits
Legislation
Criminal Defence Service Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk