Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Attlee (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 October 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].


Road Safety Bill [HL]

My Lords, I rise to support my noble friend Lord Hanningfield and take a contrary view. Some discretion is required. Supposing an older brother, known to be violent, was actually the driver at the time, and the owner of the car declines to give the necessary information. He can pick up six points because he was scared of his brother. Some discretion would be appropriate for the courts. As the noble Viscount said, it is an absolute offence. In that case, however, the courts would say ““OK, we can understand that. That is three points””. It would still be a big deterrent.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c614 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Dangerous driving Fixed penalties Disqualification Driving instruction Identification Driving tests Motor vehicles Mobile phones Safety Roads Testing Road traffic offences Driving licences Motor insurance
Legislation
Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk