Proceeding contribution from Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 October 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].
Road Safety Bill [HL]
I apologise for coming in again, but the Minister makes a point that it is in a case of obvious and serious wrongdoing that the six points would be imposed. The Bill is so drafted that it refers only to a duty to give information as to the identity of the driver, and is drafted in a way which could cover the position that he is concerned about, where there is an incentive, but could equally well cover the innocent circumstance that I referred to. I agree with the noble Lord that in the best world—and it sometimes is the best world—the police do come round and give you a second chance and consequently the situation does not arise unless you are dishonest. But we have an automatic penalty of quite a serious nature in practice in circumstances which can cover both wrongdoing and innocent carelessness. That is the danger of automatic penalties and I ask the Minister to invite the department to think again.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 674 c619
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Dangerous driving Fixed penalties Disqualification Driving instruction Identification Driving tests Motor vehicles Mobile phones Safety Roads Testing Road traffic offences Driving licences Motor insurance
- Legislation
- Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-06-21 11:52:43 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_267161
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_267161
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_267161