Proceeding contribution from Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 October 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].
Road Safety Bill [HL]
I support most of what the noble Lord, Lord Hanningfield, said. This is possibly a sort of stalking horse for something that goes much further. I know that my colleagues, if they were present, would agree that they will have a lot to say about it, should such an extension—if that is the right word—be proposed. I am not as concerned as the noble Lord, Lord Hanningfield, about a tax on the motorist, but I am concerned about the Government proposing that we should have a form of licence—whatever form—for which we will pay what will possibly be a large sum. I have one of the old licences, which is perfectly good, as far as I can see. If I have to face getting an interim licence and then another replacement, how much money will I be asked to pay? What information is to be included on the new licence? The Minister’s answer will be studied closely in Hansard by myself and by other people.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 674 c665
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Dangerous driving Fixed penalties Disqualification Driving instruction Identification Driving tests Motor vehicles Mobile phones Safety Roads Testing Road traffic offences Driving licences Motor insurance
- Legislation
- Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-06-21 11:52:37 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_267239
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_267239
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_267239