Proceeding contribution from Adam Ingram (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 8 November 2005. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Modernising Logistics Provision.
Modernising Logistics Provision
I said in my opening statement that there is no strategic need for Sealand to remain in the MOD, but it is important as we introduce the new aircraft, as well as for the legacy systems. High grade work is carried out at Sealand and it is essential for the new Typhoon that that be maintained. The potential for Sealand is great. Investment will be required to change some of the tooling and support equipment to move from analogue to digital avionics, and that could allow Sealand—whether it is in the public or private sector—the opportunity to join the Typhoon support and supply chain for other countries. I cannot predict that that will happen, but if that part of the business is properly resourced and configured, it could win such additional business. Sealand has a good long-term future.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 439 c173
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Armed forces Cost effectiveness Closures Executive agencies Redundancy Military aircraft Sales Repairs and maintenance Reviews Reorganisation Army Base Repair Organisation Defence Aviation Repair Agency Gosport Logistics RAF St Athan
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-02 19:19:56 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271766
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271766
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271766