Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Adam Ingram (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 8 November 2005. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Modernising Logistics Provision.


Modernising Logistics Provision

I do recognise that there is a huge loss. It does not come easy to me, or any Defence or Labour Minister, to make such announcements. I do not feel a sense of betrayal. I have tried to set out the logic of what we are doing: why it is inevitable, why it is good for defence and why we believe that it best configures that aspect of logistic support for the RAF. My hon. Friend made a particular point about apprenticeships. I have said elsewhere that bits of British industry would not exist without MOD investment, and I sometimes question what the rest of British industry is doing about apprenticeships in the aerospace sector. We are mindful of the issue, however, and will work with the Welsh Assembly to try to find a way of ensuring that the apprenticeship stream is maintained. It may not be wholly to do with the MOD, but we realise that it is vital. It is not simply for the MOD to provide aerospace apprenticeships; the rest of the industry has something to contribute as well.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
439 c174 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Armed forces Cost effectiveness Closures Executive agencies Redundancy Military aircraft Sales Repairs and maintenance Reviews Reorganisation Army Base Repair Organisation Defence Aviation Repair Agency Gosport Logistics RAF St Athan
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk