Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Adam Ingram (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 8 November 2005. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Modernising Logistics Provision.


Modernising Logistics Provision

I do not quite know what point my hon. Friend is making about the assessment regarding the supply and service industry. Of course, the flow of parts is a key component of any support mechanism. If my hon. Friend is talking about his other concerns regarding the situation in Chorley and munitions support, we have put in place a comprehensive agreement between ourselves and BAE Systems to ensure that the munitions supply chain is maintained for the good reason that that is 110 per cent. essential. As for whether the new platforms will be better than the old ones, I have to say yes. They are certainly more expensive. I do not know which platforms and maintenance my hon. Friend is talking about, but we want to ensure that we get the best capabilities to maintain the supply chain and the supply and support mechanism. What we are doing is fundamentally correct. I know that the process is painful and difficult, but if we did not do it, we would be spending money unwisely on defence.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
439 c176 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Armed forces Cost effectiveness Closures Executive agencies Redundancy Military aircraft Sales Repairs and maintenance Reviews Reorganisation Army Base Repair Organisation Defence Aviation Repair Agency Gosport Logistics RAF St Athan
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk