Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andrew Dismore (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 9 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.


Terrorism Bill

Earlier, my right hon. Friend referred to the evidence of Mr. Clarke to the Joint Committee on Human Rights. Mr. Clarke emphasised, however, that we are talking about a maximum period of three months:"““I certainly would not envisage the three months becoming the norm.””" He also stressed the strain on police officers, who were"““sleeping on the floor, not going home, just ploughing their way through this vast amount of data””." Those officers"““would rather serious criminal investigations were conducted in a slightly calmer and more ordered atmosphere than that.””" Without an extension, could the present situation not lead to a miscarriage of justice, because the police cannot investigate properly or effectively, and are unable patiently to work their way through the evidence?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
439 c341 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Civil liberties Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Appeals Detainees Applications Arrests Evidence Incitement Judges National security Prosecutions Police custody Terrorism Remand in custody Cryptography High Court Habeas corpus Encouragement of terrorism Sunset clauses
Legislation
Terrorism Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk