Proceeding contribution from Richard Burden (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 2 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Terrorism Bill.
Terrorism Bill
I will not name the Member because she is not here. She said:"““It recognises that her statement was irresponsible and gave the green light to terrorism.””" Does not that show that there is no easy distinction to be drawn, which is why the clause is so dangerous?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 438 c872
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Criminal investigation Detainees Evidence Incitement Judges Police Powers Prosecutions Public interest Police custody Negligence Terrorism Training Remand in custody Encouragement of terrorism Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-09-24 15:59:00 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_273515
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_273515
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_273515