Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bach (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 November 2005. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Commons Bill [HL].


Commons Bill [HL]

I shall do my best to answer some of those questions. The noble Baroness asked about ring-fencing. We can provide funding for pilot programmes, which will initially be brought on, but later on we are not allowed to ring-fence because Government policy allows for flexibility for local authorities to spend as they want. It is too early to say which areas will be pilot areas, but that is a legitimate question. We might come back to it at some stage, although it may be after Royal Assent that we have a better idea about that. The answer to the Wales question reminds me of the issue that my noble friend raised yesterday, for which he is still owed an answer. I hope to give him that answer next Tuesday. His question was so important that we need at least a week to give him the proper answer. Funding in Wales is a matter for the National Assembly. It is up to the Assembly; it may wish to target funding or the roll-out of implementation, but the constitutional position is exactly as he said; it is a matter for the Assembly. I very much doubt whether anything that I said would influence things one way or the other.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c81-2GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
ICT Access Applications Agriculture Costs Common land Functions Land use Grazing land Local government Membership Management Maps Public opinion Registration Voting rights Transitional arrangements Wildlife Rules of procedure Voluntary work Sites of special scientific interest Commons councils Village greens
Legislation
Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk