Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 November 2005. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Commons Bill [HL].


Commons Bill [HL]

I shall write to the noble Lord if I am wrong, but my understanding is that there is nothing between us in what we are seeking to achieve. The points that he has made are points that my noble friend made in debate, as the noble Lord recognised. The issue is whether the amendment does anything to remove any impediment or to make the process easier, apart from making the process automatically move from A to B. I hope that I have explained that, because of the nature of the difference between the statutory association and the voluntary one—I gave the example of its stronger powers in terms of criminal offence—we would have to be assured that the process was fair and equitable, but none of us wish to see it become administratively cumbersome or unnecessarily expensive. I am certain that I can give the noble Lord the assurance he is seeking.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c103GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
ICT Access Applications Agriculture Costs Common land Functions Land use Grazing land Local government Membership Management Maps Public opinion Registration Voting rights Transitional arrangements Wildlife Rules of procedure Voluntary work Sites of special scientific interest Commons councils Village greens
Legislation
Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk