Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Livsey of Talgarth (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 November 2005. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Commons Bill [HL].


Commons Bill [HL]

In responding to the debate, which has been short but very useful, I should say that I appreciate the support of the noble Lord, Lord Inglewood. This is a simple statement of how it is possible to become more effective as a commons association. As the noble Baroness said, this may not be the appropriate place, particularly for voluntary commons associations, but none the less, it is a form of guidance for commons associations to become more effective. Perhaps a few of them may wish, for reasons stated, to become statutory commons associations. Information about guidance and consultation of this nature may well appear in regulations; I do not know. But I think it should be drawn to the attention of commons associations that they are able to move forward efficiently and effectively and be, perhaps, slightly better organised. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 133 not moved.] Clause 27 [Status]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c104GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
ICT Access Applications Agriculture Costs Common land Functions Land use Grazing land Local government Membership Management Maps Public opinion Registration Voting rights Transitional arrangements Wildlife Rules of procedure Voluntary work Sites of special scientific interest Commons councils Village greens
Legislation
Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk