Proceeding contribution from Earl of Caithness (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 November 2005. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Commons Bill [HL].
Commons Bill [HL]
In principle I am attracted by the amendment, but I see a huge difficulty. As we know, Natural England can be part of the commons association. The amendment shows how many conflicts of interest there will be. Like the noble Lord, I think that the commons association ought to have better weight with the official bodies but, if the official body is on the commons association to begin with, I see all sorts of fun and games, and pretty good misery in due course.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c105GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- ICT Access Applications Agriculture Costs Common land Functions Land use Grazing land Local government Membership Management Maps Public opinion Registration Voting rights Transitional arrangements Wildlife Rules of procedure Voluntary work Sites of special scientific interest Commons councils Village greens
- Legislation
- Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-04-15 10:42:23 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279615
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279615
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279615