Proceeding contribution from Duke of Montrose (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 November 2005. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Commons Bill [HL].
Commons Bill [HL]
I wonder whether the Minister understood that my amendment merely stated that the two authorities should agree on regulations prescribing the standard terms of the constitution. We did not suggest that the two authorities should agree on all the regulations that will be applied under the Bill. It was only for the standard terms of the constitution. As has been pointed out to us, there will be possibilities for varying the constitution to suit the circumstances of individual commons associations, but it might be a help if the standard terms were uniform across the two authorities. That is the area that we wish to probe. We probably wish to revisit this at some point, but in the meantime, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c109GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- ICT Access Applications Agriculture Costs Common land Functions Land use Grazing land Local government Membership Management Maps Public opinion Registration Voting rights Transitional arrangements Wildlife Rules of procedure Voluntary work Sites of special scientific interest Commons councils Village greens
- Legislation
- Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-04-15 10:42:25 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279624
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279624
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279624