Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Duke of Montrose (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 November 2005. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Commons Bill [HL].

Commons Bill [HL]

I have been interested to hear what the Minister has had to say on the matter. Whether I am recommending the list of options or not, it seems that Clause 29 is to a certain extent the Government’s response to the question of whether there could be prescribed national constitution terms. If we go through this, we will be setting out a potential list for a draft constitution. I am basically in favour of it, although we would look at it in terms of the content. The discussion on moneys will be interesting; we will all be interested in what the Minister has to say on that. Amendment No. 141 was just a probing amendment, so we are glad to hear how the Minister responded. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 140 and 141 not moved.] Clause 29 agreed to. Clause 30 [Functions]:

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c115-6GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
ICT Access Applications Agriculture Costs Common land Functions Land use Grazing land Local government Membership Management Maps Public opinion Registration Voting rights Transitional arrangements Wildlife Rules of procedure Voluntary work Sites of special scientific interest Commons councils Village greens
Legislation
Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk