Proceeding contribution from Lord Bach (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 November 2005. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Commons Bill [HL].
Commons Bill [HL]
This is a very interesting debate on a very interesting topic. The noble Lord, Lord Tyler, was typically modest about his amendments. I do not know if he will forgive me if I do not give my full rebuttal, as it is called, of all the points. I do not think he made them all because he gave way on his amendments to those who spoke later. The issue of the CROW Act appeared in what he had to say and also in what the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, had to say. Let me try to answer those issues. We believe that the CROW Act provides a full regime for managing access to commons with local restrictions where necessary and access management by the local authority. We do not want the Bill to confuse the issue by cutting across those arrangements. I think that that is a sensible approach.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c125GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- ICT Access Applications Agriculture Costs Common land Functions Land use Grazing land Local government Membership Management Maps Public opinion Registration Voting rights Transitional arrangements Wildlife Rules of procedure Voluntary work Sites of special scientific interest Commons councils Village greens
- Legislation
- Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-04-15 10:42:35 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279659
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279659
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279659